Tuesday, February 26, 2013

OUR LIVES, OUR MEMORIES, OUR TOWERS





FEBRUARY 26, 1993: FIRST BLOOD, WTC NYC
FIRST CASUALTIES IN A WAR STILL RAGING 
Evacuated employee of the North Tower on February 26, 1993



(Tuesday February 26, 2013. New York, NY) To the people living in the vast expanse that is our country this date likely has no historical significance.  For many of us living or working in the Greater NYC Metropolitan Area it is different; for some today possesses historic and personal meaning.  Twenty years ago today the first blood was drawn in a conflict that is still taking American blood.  It was on this very date in 1993 that the embryonic seed of what would ultimately mature into a fierce and bitter foe made its presence felt on our shores. 

It was one of those typical raw New York February afternoons with the gunmetal grey sky above spitting precipitation that fell undecidedly as snow and sleet.  The initial reports came just after noon; there had been a large, powerful explosion in the subterranean levels of the North Tower of the World Trade Center.  AS FDNY, NYPD and PAPD made their way to the site, an orderly evacuation was already underway.  Aside from the smoke and dust in the stairwells all means of egress were open.  There would sadly be six fatalities and over 1000 people treated for smoke inhalation and minor injuries but the majority of the 25,000 people employed in the North Tower would exit the building unscathed.

With the clarity of hindsight it seems incomprehensible that our federal government and its huge, bloated intelligence apparatus, failed to see this event for what it was.  Now that all the dots have been rigorously dusted off and connected it is an outrage that the event that transpired 20 years ago today was not recognized as a harbinger.  That is precisely what it was.  It was the first shot, the first strike on American soil that was an ominous opening salvo in an asymmetrical conflict that has spanned the last two decades.  What was ignited in that Ryder rental truck was more than the crude but moderately effective explosive device assembled by Ramzi Yousef and a small cluster of like-minded zealots from the Muslim communities in Brooklyn and Jersey City: what was ignited was a fuse that would ultimately result in a full blown hot war.

Had Yousef’s truck bomb been parked adjacent to a more vital structural element than it had been the damage to the 110 story tower could have been dramatically worse.  As it was the bomb made the building shudder like a boxer receiving a low blow.  After the initial explosion sent shockwaves outward and upwards throughout the superstructure of steel columns and re-enforced concrete, it shook the force off like a dog shaking a flea from its back.  The brilliance and ingenuity of the design, engineering and construction of the World Trade Towers would not succumb to a device such as that placed in the parking level below.  It would require much more force and energy, greater skill, planning, patience and resolve to topple one of Our Twin Towers.  In a cruel twist of fate eight years would pass before we would witness the forces and learn of the evil men who could and would indeed bring Our Towers down.  They had made their intentions known and had been living among us for some time.  The intelligence failures and incompetence were epic and tragically fatal.
*****     *****     *****

After his apprehension by US Diplomatic Security Service Officers on February 6, 1995 Yousef was extradited to New York City.  As the helicopter that was shuttling him from the airport to the Manhattan Correctional Facility passed over the World Trade Center, one of his escorts removed the hood that had been placed over his head and said, “Look they’re still standing.”  Yousef’s chilling reply was as arrogant as it was prophetic:“Next time” he said, they would be brought down. 

Despite the fact that Saudi multimillionaire turned self-proclaimed mujahidin, Osama Bin Laden literally declared war on the United States during a TV interview conducted in his mountain lair near the rugged Afghanistan-Pakistan border region in 1994, US intelligence dismissed him as a "non-lethal threat". Inexplicably his threats were not greeted with the urgency they demanded from the CIA and FBI.  Bin Laden quickly began to make good on his word by launching a series of attacks on US interest abroad.  From the simultaneous bombings of the US Embassies on August 7, 1998 in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya  to the deadly suicide bombing of the USS Cole while fueling in the Port of Aden in Yemen on October 12, 2000, Bin Laden’s Al Qaeda network was metastasizing and spreading with small terrorist cells embedded in places from Hamburg, Germany to San Diego, California. Under the direction of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Yousef’s uncle, the years immediately prior to their epic strike on September 11, 2001, elements of what would be a 19 member suicide squad came to the United States to acquire pilot training and refine the details of their closely guarded mission.  We know how that worked out.  It took methodical planning and eight years to accomplish but they never lost their resolve.  This is difficult for Westerners to comprehend.  Time is relative and for our adversary time works to their advantage in this lopsided struggle of cutting edge military hardware and technology versus Dark Ages hatred, bitterness, and vengeance.

Hatred, as misguided as it often is can serve as a powerful uniting force and motivator.  Adhering to a strict form of Islam and its rigorous practices and the concept of jihad as well as the harsh doctrine of Takfir and al-Takeyya Bin Laden and his mentor, a former Muslim Brotherhood zealot, the Egyptian physician Ayman Zawahiri, Bin Laden had found safe haven in post-Soviet war era Afghanistan that was largely under control of the ultra-strict Islamists known as the Taliban.  It was from this remote ancient location that Bin Laden’s war on America was launched.  To this day there are approximately 55,000 American troops in Afghanistan locked in an intractable guerrilla war with the remnants of Al Qaeda, a resurgent Taliban, and battle hardened, tenacious Afghan tribes who have expelled all foreign troops from their homeland for millennium.

It is important to recognize that the virulent strain of Islam that is manifest by Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and the Taliban is not accepted by the overwhelming majority of the world's 1.8 billion Muslims. Islam is one of the three major religions tracing their roots  back to the Middle East.  Muslims the world over have renounced Bin Laden's twisted interpretation of jihad and have absolutely no association with or connection to any militant, radical or terrorist activities.  Quite the contrary; Islam is a religion with a strong doctrine of peace, goodwill, non violence and acceptance.  Our conflict is not with Islam, Muslims or Arabs.  It is with a comparatively extremely small group of men adhering to a bastardized version of sacred Islamic text.

*****     *****     *****

But today is not the time to analyze the monumental failures by our intelligence community.  It is probably also inappropriate to examine the fledgling group of radicals who would evolve into al Qaeda and their poisonous roots to the so-called “Blind Sheik”, Omar Abdel Rahman, who fomented hatred from his grimy mosque in Journal Square, Jersey City.  All those facts, relationships, and connections are known today.  A wealth of solid journalistic accounts, books, studies, and the highly respected 9 – 11 Commission report have filled in all the blank spots in that larger than expected picture. 

Today is about remembering; remembering and taking stock of the lessons (if any) learned in the last 20 years because there certainly is much to remember and many, many lessons that have been taught.  It is arguable if our government and intelligence community have learned anything.  One fact that should be apparent on this 20th anniversary of the first attack on America in New York City is that those we fight and seek to do us harm do not tell time in the same form or fashion we do.  These are rabid extremists still aggrieved over the Crusades; while time, development, and modernization may have passed them by, they are conversely technologically savvy.  They have used technology to their advantage in their efforts to recreate the Caliphate, a radical Islamic ideal rooted in antiquity.

*****     *****     *****

For anyone who was in the North Tower or responded to the emergency calls in an official capacity on February 26, 1993, today holds a host of memories.  The experiences of that day forever changed those people as profoundly as it did for all those present on September 11, 2001.  Some of the changes enacted by the Port Authority and the tenant companies in the Twin Towers were responsible for saving an unknown number of lives on that gorgeous Tuesday morning eight years later. 

In the wake of that first terrorist attempt to topple the Towers strict sanctions were imposed regarding access to the underground parking and service levels as well as the WTC Plaza itself. Tenant companies assigned fire marshals who regularly staged fire drills and evacuation procedures that would serve them well on 9-11-01.  Years of constant drilling allowed for a remarkably orderly evacuation when the “big strike” hit. 

In the intervening time between February 26, 1993 and September 11, 2001, our adversary carefully plotted and planned.  They identified and exploited our security weaknesses in the immigration process, air travel, and civilian flight training just as they took into account our default position that had been complacency and our misplaced trust in the federal government to protect us here at home.  The profound differences from that first attempt to the collapse of the Twin Towers are as clear an illustration of their tenacity as there can be.  That is precisely why we need to remain on guard; we must never again allow inconvenience and complacency compromise our security and safety.

*****     *****     *****

In our national conscience the attack of 20 years ago pales in comparison to the monumental sequence of events 8 years later.  How could it not.  September 11, 2001 was as profound a day in American history as there has ever been.  But there were those who perished on February 26, 1993; there were scores injured some severely, and our confidence was rattled, our sense of security questioned.  Every man and woman who exited the North Tower that day was carried or walked out of that enormous building a different person than they were when they walked in that morning to go to work.  We owe those victims as much homage as we do the thousands who perished on 9-11-01.  In a sense they were victims of a forgotten battle in an undeclared war, that in no way diminishes the price they and their families paid.  In some way it elevates it because they did not lose their lives for naught; they died so others would live the next time those Towers needed to be evacuated. 

*****     *****     *****

There are a group of men, long forgotten, except by those of us who vividly recall the circumstances that lead to the construction of the Twin Towers and those who actually built them.  What came to be the most iconic architectural masterpieces in a famed skyline of impressive edifices, the Twin Towers were modern marvels of design and construction ahead of their time in many ways.  From the earliest days of development of the site with David Rockefeller spear-heading those efforts he partnered with men of a caliber, vision, and integrity the likes of whom collectively this City will not ever see again.

Austin Tobin, the all-powerful leader of the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, saw what Rockefeller envisioned and labored tirelessly for years before the first shovelful of earth was excavated from that 16 acre plot.  The selection of the little-known architect Minoru Yamasaki proved to be brilliant not only for his lean minimalistic design but for the wide open spaces that transferred much of the weight bearing to the exterior columns.  The up and coming structural engineer, Leslie Robertson utilized framed tube -boxed girder precast units anchored to the central core which housed elevator and utility shafts and stairwells.  The combination of these novel structural elements gave the buildings stability and strength that surpassed heavier more conventionally erected skyscrapers. 

The Karl Koch Erecting Company, engineers including Leslie Robertson from Skidmore, Owens & Merrill, General Contractor Tishman Realty & Construction Company, the irrepressible Port Authority Superintendent of the massive project, Guy Tozzoli are just a few notable unsung heroes of the finished product that came to be The World Trade Center as are the thousands of, riggers, operating engineers, steel workers, and skilled tradesmen of every variety whose efforts and sweat made a dense set of blue prints become reality.

Actually, by the recognized codes and standards of their day they were “over-built”.  Wind tunnel testing and computer modeling (very new at that time) proved the Towers to possess a flexible strength able to withstand hurricane force gales and the impact of a slow moving 707, one of the largest commercial airliners of the 1960’s.  We know today that those building absorbed the force of Yousef’s truck bomb and the two 767’s fully loaded with jet fuel.  In the case of September 11, it was the raging fires that caused the steel members to warp and buckle which ultimately led to their collapse.  The impact of huge jet planes travelling at an estimated 500 to 600 hundred miles per hour at the moment of impact shook the fire resistant protective foam off the surfaces to which it had been applied.  No one ever anticipated the magnitude and forces of the impacts on 9-11.  If not for the fires there would have not been subsequent load failure.  It can be said that the architecture and engineering of the Twin Towers allowed many thousands to evacuate to safety.  Buildings of inferior design and construct no doubt would have claimed far many more lives than were lost after both of the Twin Towers were hit.

*****     *****     *****

Our Towers were toppled, our family and friends lives lost, and thousands of psyches bear scars while hundreds of First Responders suffer from the toxins inhaled working on the recovery efforts after 9 – 11, yet our spirit and resolved never wavered.  The Towers were of us and we of them; we shared them with the world but they were ours.  Anyone who was touched by the fear and horror of that day 20 years ago or the madness and death of 8 years later knows just how personal our relationship with those buildings and that place was and remains.


To all those we lost
and all those who survived
and all who remember,
Bless 





TAGS: WORLD TRADE CENTER TRUCK BOMB 1993, RAMZI YOUSEF, AL QAEDA, OSAMA BIN LADEN, DAVID ROCKEFELLER, AUTIN TOBIN PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK & NEW JERSEY, GUY TOZZOLI, LESLIE ROBERTSON, MINORU YAMASAKI, KOCH ERECTING COMPANY, SKIDMORE, OWENS & MERRILL,  NYPD, FDNY, PAPD, 9-11-01, TWIN TOWERS, WORLD TRADE CENTER PLAZA, WTC



LINKS:














Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2013 © All Rights Reserved


Saturday, February 16, 2013

WHAT’S THE MATTER WITH CORNEL WEST?



AND WHY IS HE SO ANTI-OBAMA?

Cornel West: race baiting, self-described “activist” & “intellectual”
wants President Obama charged as a “war criminal”



(Saturday February 16, 2013.  Princeton, NJ) Outside the insular confines of academia’s ivory towers and the even smaller elite cadre of “African- American Studies” professors, self-described Black activists, intellectuals, and fans of the Tavis Smiley radio program, the overwhelming majority of Americans are unacquainted with Cornel West and well they should be.  Currently Dr. West is a professor at Princeton University, a rather prolific author of semi-original works dealing with race, gender, and class in America and in particular voices, in his arrogant, racially skewed, opinion, his belief that the United States is a "racist patriarchal" nation where white supremacy continues to define everyday life. 

West is a member of that slender slice of African-American, affirmative action benefiting pseudo-philosophers more rabblerouser than thinker; more charlatan than legitimate scholarly author, more radical activist than dedicated advocate for any cause.  His main cause apparently is to advance his own skewed perspectives on racial and societal matters while enriching himself by hawking his books and charging exorbitantly high speaking fees to “preach” his message and “educate young brothers and sisters” about the “true nature” of our culture as he myopically views it from his lofty perch. 

One might assume that a man who proclaims to be an advocate for racial equality and especially dedicated to the plight of Black America, Cornel West would be a strong supporter of this country’s first African-American president but you would be mistaken.  West has never been a true backer of President Obama and in print and in speech he derisively refers to our president as “Brother Barack”.  It seems that West has a litany of complaints about Barack Obama and his latest accusations reveal just how deep his animosity for Obama is.

Prior to the second Inauguration of President Obama Dr. West assailed him for planning to use Martin Luther King Jr.’s Bible to swear the oath of office.  West contended that Obama didn’t “deserve to use” Dr. King’s Bible because Obama’s experience as a Black man in America was uniquely different from that of the rest of Black American men.  This is an odd allegation considering the fact that Cornel west has about as much in common with the rest of Black American men as he does with white Jewish women on Long Island.  West is a product of the affirmative action programs that provided him entry into Harvard for his undergraduate degree and ultimately onto the faculty at that prestigious Ivy league school. 

West is on the faculty here at Princeton University since his dismissal from Harvard in 2002 for his “sub-par performance, failure to conduct any original research or produce peer reviewed writing”, all of which are essentials for faculty members at such a university.  Then Harvard president, Larry Summers, dismissed Dr. West also citing the fact that West spend an inappropriate amount of time away from his duties at Harvard to promote and enrich himself by hawking his books and collecting large speaking fees. 

Earlier this week West made the news with his wild accusations that President Obama should be tried as a “war criminal” because of the number of deaths related to drone strikes in countries the Administration has targeted known terrorists and their encampments.   The United States military goes through great lengths to avoid injuring or killing innocent people.  “Collateral damage” is the undignified euphemism to describe such unintentional deaths and each one is a tragedy.    Professor West may serve his students and followers better if he were to focus on the reasons President Obama in his role as Commander-in-Chief approves of the tactical and strategic utilization of the unmanned aircraft called drones.  Instead, the rabble-rousing, flame throwing “intellectual” has chosen the lowest common denominator in a very complex equation to attack the President, an African-American man who does not seem to meet the strict criteria of what he considers an African-American man imposed by Professor West. Even the most cursory review of West’s writings, lectures and speeches show that “Blackness” is a favorite topic for the esteemed Professor.

While Dr. West and his opinions occupy a far outpost of legitimacy, he is not totally alone on the fringe.  There are other Ivy League schooled and employed African-American “intellectuals”, “activists”, and “thinkers”, who have made their reputations and careers by being “professional Black” provocateurs.  Characters like Michael Eric Dyson and Henry Louis Gates have at one time or another headed a university “Black Studies” department or, using the more recent politically correct vernacular, “African-American Studies” programs.  These were positions created to fulfill the mandates of affirmative action as well as by a strain of academic liberals with some oddly acquired sense of “White Guilt”.  That slavery is an indelible stain on the soul of this great nation is undeniable; that 400 years of slavery in America created a legacy that contributes to this day to some of the very real, serious dysfunctions in the African-American community writ large from coast to coast.  Despite profound endemic problems in “Black America” all the African-American Studies professors in the country have done nothing of substance to enact change, to bring their high powered intellects and influence into the communities that suffer most.  No, they spend their careers in the scholarly assembly of lists of all the problems, all the ills, all the injustice, poverty, despair, violence, unemployment, under-education, and helplessness in those communities.  Perhaps they are unable to offer suggestions and recommendations and actually work towards improving the lot of their “brothers and sisters” but they are so far removed physically, mentally, geographically, financially and in every other way from their beleaguered “community” that they would not know where to start.

President Obama has done more to elevate the spirits if not the prospects of a generation of African-Americans simply by having been twice elected to the highest office in the land than Dr. West has or will ever accomplish.  The ascendancy of Barack Obama is precisely what makes West fume.  After all he and his ilk have made their careers exploiting the conditions and circumstances in the African-American population and much of the wind has been blocked from his sails with an African-American in the White House, twice elected by significant if not impressive majorities.  Black America alone did not place Obama in the White House, a broad coalition across all demographics did.

If anyone should be held accountable for “war crimes” it should be Dick Cheney and his imbecile side kick George W. Bush.  It is their legacy of an ill-conceived military doctrine of preemptive war and the host of extra-constitutional policies and tactics that should be investigated; the current President inherited that host of toxic weeds overgrowing our historic military philosophy.  But that is beside the point here; Dr. West and his ignorant, hostile rhetoric and thinking is the point.

The election of Barack Obama did not automatically eradicate the problems in Black America; it did not bring them more jobs, better schools, health care, or housing.  It did however bring Black America and all Americans the very real positive message that anything is possible.  In a nation as young and dynamic as ours, despite the anger, rancor and bitter partisanship that has come to define the political process and holds the legislative process hostage, our first Black President represents truths far beyond the details of his own unique journey.  One might think that African-American intellectuals, activists, professors, and philosophers all across America would celebrate his presidency but, if they listen to Dr. West they would be sadly mistaken and that, in and of itself is sad.  Dr. West should be ashamed of himself but men like him lack the capability to be shamed.


TAGS: CORNEL WEST, WAR CRIMES, PRESIDENT OBAMA, BLACK AMERICA, AFRICAN-AMERICAN STUDIES PROGRAMS, PROFESSIONAL BLACKS,

LINKS:










Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2013 © All Rights Reserved

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

HE SAID, SHE SAID



YES, THEY REALLY WERE ELECTED














Senator Marco Rubio and Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi: And we
wonder why nothing gets accomplished in Washington DC?



(Wednesday February 13, 2013.  Washington, DC)  After President Barack Obama delivered his annual State of the Union Address before a joint session of Congress and millions of American television viewer, both the Democratic and Republican Party’s were able to put before the American public prime examples of their respective Party’s gross incompetence and sub-par intellects.  In what has become a tradition a specially selected member of the opposition Party, the Party not holding the White House, is given the opportunity to telecast their “response” to the President’s address.  Since the Democratic president has been in Office now for five years, the Republicans have had five chances to showcase one of their “best and brightest”, one of their internally designated “rising stars”.  In the last four years we have had to painfully watch as the Republican designated to perform this politically important task have not been able to make the grade.  Actually, the last four Republicans each bombed in their own unique moronic ways and clearly Florida Republican Senator, Marco Rubio, honored that expanding tradition.  The young freshman Senator likely removed himself from the ranks of his Party’s up and comers by being down and out before a large national audience.

The GOP chose the boyish looking Senator for obvious and crass political reasons.  Having lost the last election by huge margins in the Latino and African-American segments of the populace the telegenic Cuban American has the superficial cosmetic appeal his Party feels they need to reach voters not inclined to vote Republican.  This could have worked to their advantage in a very small way but instead it backfired miserably as Rubio delivered an incoherent, convoluted, contradictory speech in a clumsy, fumbling manner.  Even if one had watched Rubio with the sound turned off it was painfully obvious he was so ill-suited to the moment and task that he resembled a little boy wearing his daddy’s business cloths as a costume. 

If one had been listening to the speech itself it was delivered in short bursts of sentences that he seemed unable to read properly from the Teleprompter; either he does not read aloud very well or the speech was presented to him without punctuation.  He was in obvious distress as his audible inhalations and exhalations sounded alternatively like a vacuum cleaner being rapidly switched on and off.  He demonstrated an odd nervous tic occasionally swiping at his temples perhaps as a way to staunch the perspiration flow or perhaps not.  It was difficult to determine.

 Much is being made about Rubio’s mid-speech awkward stretch for a small bottle of drinking water to add some much needed moisture to his dry mouth but that was not really that big of a deal.  By that time he had already amply shown the American public that he is just another empty suit; another idiot politico uninterested in the nuts and bolts of legislating but rather in Washington DC to pursue his own self-serving ambitions.  Yes, Marco had a featured role at the Republican National Convention last year in Tampa.  He delivered to that moribund crowd a speech that was essentially nothing more than an autobiography of the life of Rubio up to that point.  But, he is young, good looking and Latino, three big assets in the eyes of the powers that be in the GOP.  Had they kept him under wraps for a few more years, at least until he matured a bit, gained some experience, and became more polished as a politician he may have been a viable candidate in 2020.  Instead they have used him to put a different public face before the voters who perceive the republicans as the Party of old, rich white, conservative men.  Based on his abysmal performance last night they seriously miscalculated their hand. 

So desperate are the Republicans to find an identity that will have a broader appeal beyond their traditional base that they will use anyone as a dupe.  In his naivety Rubio likely thought his selection to make the GOP response was an honor bestowed to him because of his political viability as a candidate who could attract a more diverse segment of the voting population , i,e,: African-Americans & Latinos,  to support Republican candidates and causes.  How sadly mistaken he was.  Perhaps if he had come across as an intellectual with feasible ideas and a willingness to compromise with the President and the Democrats on some of the most serious issues of the day, those issues that resonant most strongly with the vast majority of Americans, he may have furthered his and his Party’s caused.  Instead he embarrassed himself.  After giving the American people such a rotten first impression it may be difficult for the ambitious youngster to recover.

From the other side of the aisle the viewing public who stayed tuned after the President’s address had concluded were treated to an interview starring the House Minority Leader, the addled California Democrat Nancy Pelosi.  On the cable network MSNBC old Nancy was interviewed by on air personality Ed Schultz.  Ed lobbed soft ball questions at the aging Congresswomen and had to suffer through her disjointed, nonsensical replies.  Nancy is either unable to speak as the result of the 20 or 30 facelifts she’s had or her Botox and red Bull addictions have left her permanently impaired.  She seemed to not be aware of her surroundings and glanced at loud mouthed Ed like he was a leper. 

Pelosi is at the other end of the spectrum from Rubio.  A long time Congresswoman from a very secure California district she has been in the House since Rubio was basically still in diapers.  She is the consummate political hack from a family of political operators.  She was the first female Speaker of the House before the GOP regained control of that useless corrupt body and installed the vapid orange tinted man, John Boehner for Ohio.  He’s been even less effective as Speaker than was the geriatric Pelosi. Pelosi is usually so befuddled that she no longer even makes an effort to appear as if she understands questions being asked of her.  She answers virtually every question with a rictus of a smile and some boilerplate blather that makes sense ot no one aside from her.

Perhaps Ms. Pelosi had a solid excuse for her incoherence, confusion, and florid dementia; she is, after all well over 70 years old and partially mummified.  It was difficult to determine if the old gal had intentionally applied her own lipstick or if a drunk had been hired to accomplish that task.  In any case she looked like a cross between Mommy Dearest and a wrinkled crack whore.  Her performance was a strong argument for term limits as well as some basic competency testing for all members of Congress who’ve held office for more than 10 years.  Thankfully MSNBC kept her air time limited and spent the balance of their post-address broadcast allowing the blithering, spitting, buffoon Chris Matthews spout out his usual voluminous partisan tripe.

After watching Rubio and Pelosi it is easy to see why the Congress has its lowest approval level in history and why they are unable to accomplish anything of substance or value for the American people.  These people and their colleagues have no agenda other than their own.  Incumbency afforded them a host of benefits that make the prospect of a rival unseating them come election time a very difficult prospect.  Such job security breeds complacency, arrogance, and effectively disconnects them from the very real pressing needs of their constituents.  Committee assignment often vault obscure back benchers into positions of Chairmanships that they have no right having.  They rely on their bloated staffs to do all the research into every issue and the Congress members themselves serve as pre-programmed mouthpieces reminiscent of the greatest mouthpiece of modern politics, the Alzheimic Ronald Reagan. 

THERE WAS A TIME

There was a time not very long ago in our history when the Senate and House were occupied by men (primarily) who were politicians, yes, but functioned in their roles ever cognizant of the responsibilities that came with the office. They not only felt obligated to serving their country and constituents but were more than willing to put partisan differences aside and work together in common purpose for the great good.  That era of Congressmen were of such a higher quality than the self-serving, money hungry, power obsessed, imbeciles that walk the corridors of the Capitol today.  Perhaps our elected officials are but a reflection of the electors, of the voting public.  As our national character has changed so dramatically in the last 30 or 40 years and our society and culture have learched through these very same changes,  so too has the quality of those we elect.  They collectively lack the integrity and intelligence, the shared sense of responsibility and purpose, and for doing the duties that would fulfill their oath of office.  There are no grand thinkers like Fulbright, Dirkson, and Moynihan.  There are no expects in special fields sitting on committees that deal with what they no best like Sam Nunn, Richard Lugar, Les Aspin, and Gerald Ford.  No, there are no statesmen or individuals of character and dedication.

All we have today are corrupt hacks, flacks, and men and women bought and paid for by the entire array of lobbyists, special interest groups, big corporations, political action committees (PAC) and any other organization or individual who can financially help them stay in office.  The members of both chambers of Congress are there to be reelected again and again.  That is their only purpose and that is why we have the ilk of people we do occupying The Capitol.



TAGS: MARCO RUBIO REPUBLICAN RESPONSE, RUBIO WATER BOTTLE GRAB, RUBIO NERVOUS TICS, DRY MOUTH, POOR READING SKILLS, NANCY PELOSI FOSSILIZED, FACE LIFTED, BOTOX INJECTED, OLD CONFUSED LADY.



LINKS;