Thursday, July 9, 2015

NY GOV CUOMO INSTALLS YET ANOTHER LAYER OF “POLICE OVERSIGHT”



NYPD BECOMING MORE TOP HEAVY AND
HAMSTRUNG
Governor Cuomo wants broader authority for the NYS Attorney General
to conduct investigations into use of deadly force reviews


TAGS: NYPD, CCRB, IAD, NY STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
ADDITIONAL POLICE “OVERSIGHT”, JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES,
SEPARATION OF STATE AND CITY





(Thursday July, 9 2015 Mott Haven, The Bronx, NYC)  The Members of Service (MOS) of the NYPD who patrol this gritty precinct in the South Bronx are in many substantial ways a world away from the public eyes of many of the more “high profile” precincts in the City such as those in Manhattan.  While much has changed in this corner of The Bronx including the Port Norris and the Melrose neighborhoods of the 40th Precinct, there remains a tenacious criminal element that make this one of the busiest Precincts in the City.  The narrow blocks of historic buildings and pre-war 5 story walk-ups can take on an air of menace after the summer sun slips off into the western horizon.  Gang related activity thrives and it is not unusual to hear random gunfire punctuate the familiar City sounds of a Bronx night.  Speaking to some of the men and women of the 40th Precinct about recent politically driven efforts to “reform” the NYPD and to install another layer of outside “oversight” to the already bloated upper echelon structure in One Police Plaza, you will hear the frustration of Cops who feel abandoned by their leadership and pawns in a potentially lethal political games of charades. In the 40th Precinct however, you will find some of the most dedicated Cops, Cops as committed and invested in this community as any of the thousands of hard working residents who live, work and raise their families here.

Life can be cheap in Mott Haven; violent death roams these streets as a familiar specter sometimes precise and pin point, at other times callously random.  Innocent very young children have died in the crossfire of thug on thug violence and, at times it is not too far a stretch of memory for those old enough or imagination for the younger Cops, to picture this segment of the South Bronx during its infamous “War Years” from the mid 1960’s through the mid 1990’s.  Despite some dire predictions that Precincts like the 40th are just the outliers of what will soon be a City-wide descent back to the “bad old days”, enough progress has been made to make that likelihood very remote if not impossible.

What you also hear from MOS of the 40th and Cops from Precincts in upper Manhattan, Brooklyn South and slivers of Queens is an emerging sense of reluctance and trepidation at play consciously as they go about their patrol tasks.  It has become fashionable, politically correct, and somehow “noble” to criticize and lambast Cops across the country in the past year.  Any Cop will tell you that it is the instincts and “feel” for the streets they work developed over years that allow them to perform at their best while keeping the general public and their colleagues safe.  Any measures designed to curtail, limit or otherwise restrict a Cops street judgement endangers lives by a significant factor.

OVERSIGHT

After years of bitter, rancorous debate in 1993 Mayor David Dinkins provided the executive mandate that allowed for the creation of the Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB) to function as an “independent” body tasked with handling public complaints about Police misconduct.  In the years since it assumed its current structure and mandate, there has been an uneasy, often fragile relationship between the CCRB and the NYPD.  It has typically been as aggressive in its mission as whomever the sitting Mayor has been.  The last years of the Michael Bloomberg administration had the two entities “peacefully coexisting” for the most part.

The NYPD has their own Internal Affairs Division (IAD) that has proven their worth in eliminating some of the most flagrant corruption and in weeding out “dirty Cops” since the heyday of the Knapp Commission in 1970 and the controversial Mollen Commission in 1992.  Other efforts have been conducted over the years including major “sting operations” that did in fact identify and prosecute MOS after lengthy investigations.  (It should be noted, just for the record, that among the rank and file MOS, members of IAD are voracious rats intent on uncovering Officer misconduct and aggressively prosecuting.  Their value is limited in part because of their history of often employing their own “corrupt” means towards an end that is the ruination of MOS careers.  Some of their tactics have been proven to constitute entrapment but the damage is done).

Aside from IAD each Borough has an Office of the Chief Prosecutor more than adequately staffed with attorneys, paralegals, clerks and a contingent of investigators.  A line of duty shooting is currently subjected to a rigorous after action report and debriefing as well as being reviewed by the Borough Prosecutor’s Office.  This is a level of oversight that has been reliably effective, objective, transparent and fair.  Despite the expected public outcry of “cover ups”, the silence among MOS in the form of The Thin Blue Line, and their perceived notion that the Police do function with impunity, the system has worked well.  The public is not privy to the deliberations of a Grand Jury so they are equally disqualified to pass judgement on its efficacy.

THE AWOL GENERAL

The New York City Department of Investigation  (DOI) is one of the oldest Law Enforcement Agencies of its kind.  With a broad mandate the DOI is a corruption fighting force investigating any allegations of corruption, fraud, and misconduct across the array of City agencies and entities contracted to work for the City.  The NYPD has an Inspector General (NYPDIG) whose Office receives its license to function by the DOI and the City Charter.  With little fanfare on May 27, 2014 Philip K. Eure assumed the post of NYPD Inspector General and, for all intents and purposes, that was the one and only time he has been heard from.  Throughout the past year as the NYPD faced harsh criticism, grand jury investigations and an ever growing chorus of Police critics, Eure has been out of the public eye.  This is somewhat bizarre since he above anyone else is in a position to launch oversight efforts such as those related to the Eric Garner case.  If he is on the job while opting to remain out of the public eye he has been a huge success.  It is difficult to say with any degree of certainty what he has been doing since taking the helm as NYPDIG. It is the responsibility of Eure and his Office to provide oversight as well as review all cases of alleged Police misconduct.  It seems now that Governor Cuomo’s announced proclamation that such cases will fall under the purview of the NY State Attorney (NY State AG) General’s Office that Eure has lost any credibility he may or may not have had at the beginning of his tenure.

OUR HAPLESS MAYOR

Mayor Bill de Blasio ran for the Office he now holds pandering to some of the malcontents and special interests groups who had seen themselves as “long suffering victims” of an abusive, racist Police Force, one that did not “value” Black lives, practiced SQF disproportionally with young men of color, and could maim or kill with impunity.  His aggressive anti-Police, anti-Stop, Question and Frisk (SQF) campaign did resonate with certain factions across NYC and it was due to their support that he won the election.  Odd thing about campaign promises is that when you are voted into Office based largely on a specific platform those who cast their votes for you expect you to make good on your campaign rhetoric.  As a candidate/critic of NYPD, de Blasio came into power with a Police Department that felt alienated by the new Mayor.  He did nothing to “mend fences”, so to speak and, if anything, he doubled down on his harsh assessment of the NYPD and in particular how MOS interacted with the Black and Brown communities.

The new Mayor quickly learned that campaign hyperbole was vastly different from having to actually conduct business and work with the NYPD.  Perhaps for political cover he hired a former NYPD who had been very popular in the mid 1990’s in the Rudy Giuliani administration Bill Bratton, to serve as his NYPD Commissioner.  In the 20 plus years since Bratton left the NYPD he became more of a politician and less of a Law Enforcement Officer and that transformation was an additional insult to the injuries de Blasio’s campaign had inflicted on the rank and file of the NYPD. 

CUOMO’S OVER-REACH

Bowing to public pressure and capitalizing on the recent trend of disparaging MOS of the LEC, Cuomo now approves a plan to have the NY State Attorney General review some of the “use of deadly force” episodes.  This raises some important questions regarding jurisdictional authority, the State’s encroachment on the City’s legal prerogatives, and is ripe with the potential for creating a tangled knot that will only make the investigation and review process of such episodes needlessly top heavy.  There remains unanswered the question as to when and why the NYSAG will be “invited in” to conduct an “independent investigation” and to what extent they will be cooperating with the local Borough Prosecutors and the NYPD itself. 

The NYPD like any LEA closely defends its territory and the possible incursion of representatives of the NYSAG into NYPD matters will only prove to erode the jurisdictional and territorial boundaries as recognized by the NYPD.  Given the profound corruption in Albany and years of failure by Governor Cuomo to address the State’s problems in any meaningful way, it is difficult to see the validity in this his latest folly.










Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2015 © All Rights Reserved

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

CHURCH SHOOTING IN SOUTH CAROLINA: NEW DEBATE ON THE SAME OLD FLAG?



THE FLAG IS NOT THE ISSUE

IT’S A MATTER OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH

SOUTH CAROLINA GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY CALLS FOR REMOVAL

OF CONFEDERATE BATTLE FLAG FROM STATEHOUSE GROUNDS


TAGS: SC CHURCH SHOOTING, CHARLESTON SOUTH CAROLINA, SIGNS AND SYMBOLS

OF THE CONFEDERACY, THE CONFEDERATE STATES DURING THE CIVIL WAR,

WAR BETWEEN THE STATES, FREEDOM OF SPEECH, FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION,

CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED



(Wednesday June 24, 2015 Charleston, SC)  As the families and friends of the victims of the fatal shooting of nine black parishioners at the Mother Emanuel AME Church here one week ago during a weekly Bible study meeting, their deaths have ignited a public/political debate focusing on what is being called the enduring symbol of institutionalized discrimination in the Deep South (and beyond), the Battle Flag of the Confederacy.  Here in South Carolina the Confederate flag flies on the grounds of the State Capitol while in several other states such as Georgia and Mississippi, the “stars and bars” are incorporated into the state flag. Long considered an emblem of defiance and rebellion not only in the former Confederate states, the flag remains an issue of great sensitivity to many and in particular African Americans across the country.  For those it is an insulting and offensive symbol of what they feel was the primary purpose of the “War Between The States”, keeping slavery legal in the South.

There is no small measure of irony in that a racist 22 year old’s individual psychotic hateful psyche led him to commit mass murder in a Black Church has resulted in prompting an Instamatic cultural and political debate over the Confederate flag. Dylann Roof, a lone disturbed, if not deranged young man accomplished in one bloody heinous act of violence what over 150 years of legislation, Supreme Court rulings, affirmative action, the Voter’s and Civil Rights Acts of the mid 1960’s, and a long list of other actions, initiatives, programs and policies intended to improve the lot for African Americans could not; the flag itself was being scrutinized not only for what it represents historically but also what it signifies today particularly among hate groups, white supremacists, and other marginalized violent movements.

Within hours of the deadly attack South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley announced that she would begin the effort to have the Confederate flag removed from the State House grounds but cautioned that the matter would have to be addressed by the South Carolina State Congress. Other states will face similar challenges in their own efforts to have the flag and other monuments, large and small honoring the Confederacy, removed from highly visible state government property.  The arguments pro and con each have merit but the entire issue ultimately can be reduced to a matter of Freedom of Speech, one of our most cherished constitutionally guaranteed rights.  The lower Courts and the Supreme Court over the years have protected what some group or another sees as heinous acts of expression invoking the Freedom of Speech as the shield providing such legal security.

In the week since the deadly shooting several of the largest retailers have announced they will no longer produce or carry in their stores items of all kinds that have the Confederate battle flag displayed.  A discussion has begun in Washington, DC about the propriety of some of the statues and painting adorning the corridors in our nation’s Capital, federally controlled public parks and other historical Civil War sites.  In states across the South buildings such as schools and local government seats of power that are named for noteworthy Confederate generals, early discussions to have them be renamed have begun.  Essentially some seek to have all traces of the Civil War no matter their nature banished from public sight forever.  Obviously this nascent discussion will open a virtual “Pandora’s Box” that will have each side of the argument deeply entrenched in their beliefs with little or no room for compromise. 

We can readily concede that the Confederate flag is an offensive reminder of one of the most ignoble, infamous chapters of our Country’s history almost akin to the systematic genocide that basically eradicated the Native Americans who’d inhabited this land long before it was ever discovered by Europeans.  An entire civilization, an enormous population was killed off under the guise of “Manifest Destiny”.  That centuries spanning atrocity is the “original sin” of the United States.  The practice of enslaving Africans to work the fields in the Deep South and, for a time, in factories in the North, has left the unhealed wound of a legacy the repercussions of which are in evidence today; institutional and societal shadows of racism regarding Black America are alive and well throughout all aspects of life today.  The irony in this reality is that in this day of the second term of the first African American President racial discord and episodes of outright bigotry and racism have emerged with many of these instances brought to the fore in the media.  For many in the Black communities from coast to coast the imagery depicting their plight has been a well-kept secret from the majority of Americans, namely, White Americans.   The importance of these issues is certainly of greater significance than the question of the displaying of the Confederate flag.  Banning the public display of the flag is but a cosmetic gesture of a reactionary moment.  Flag or no flag African Americans still must confront overt and insidious forms of discrimination, racial profiling in some very limited aspects of law enforcement, and in White society at large.

The question that needs to be engaged by all Americans is the meaning of Freedom of Speech.  The Supreme Court has upheld the legality of many open forms of public expression that many find deplorable, disgusting, unacceptable and unpatriotic.  The burning of the American flag is a protected legal form of expression as are any number of signs, insignia, acts of civil disobedience, highly inflammatory rhetoric, and what some consider offensive behavior are just some of the acts of expression deemed to be covered by Freedom of Speech.  The flying of the Confederate flag is no less a form of expression, an act of Freedom of Speech, than any of the other questionable yet legal practices so common in public throughout the USA. 

People of good will can engage in debate, politicians will take whatever the path of least resistance provides them political expediency in this topic of the Confederate flag but such pandering or divisiveness has little bearing on the reality of life in America in 2015. 

The last 12 months alone have been crudely punctuated by episodes of young Black unarmed men being killed by White LEO’s.  While this is an entirely different discussion and one that the Brooding Cynyc has addressed here previously, the ease with which the wounds of racism have been once again been ripped open are tangible examples at how far the gulf between White America and Black America is in some jurisdictions.

An odd backdrop to race relations today is that Black Americans serve at the highest levels in government and the private sector.  The “pop culture” of today’s youth is clear evidence of the phenomenon known as the “Blackafiscation” of America.  From music to fashion Black entertainers, athletes, celebrities, and others prominent in the culture geared to our youth, have a huge impact on White youth.  This has been a trend that began more than 20 years ago and it shows no sign of tapering off.  Sadly, some of the most powerful cultural influences at work on Black and White youth focuses and glamorizes the worst aspects of inner city life; “Ghettoization” in many respects only serves to reinforce White adult’s worst notions about young Black men and, in many fundamental ways only further marginalizes them.  White kids can don the apparel of the “streets”, the “hood” but, once they take off those cloths they are White and do not face the same social challenges that Black youths do in attempting to gain employment and many other important facets of adulthood.

So for this latest moment in our struggle with race the Confederate flag is the issue du jour. Like racism itself it will not die a quiet, easy death; there will no doubt be vigorous debates and discussions and it will take a great deal of effort to have it and other “tributes” to the Confederacy eliminated from public property.  As the presidential primary season begins to ramp up late next month the flag issue will no doubt be used as a litmus test.  That might be a good thing since so often political primaries are such monumental wastes of time, money, and can profoundly alienate voters already apathetic to the concept that their vote matters.

We will see what we will see…



































Wednesday, June 3, 2015

ENFORCING THE LAW IN NYC: THE “HUMAN FACTOR” & HARSH REALITY



PROTECTING AND SERVING WHILE HAMSTRUNG
THIS IS NOT THE TIME FOR OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT TO BE TAKING
A PASSIVE STANCE. 


TAGS: NYPD, NYPD “REFORM”, DE BLASIO’S ERRORS,
 COMMUNITY LEADERS WANT “STOP, QUESTION, AND FRISK” TO RETURN
TO THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS AS CRIME RATES INCREASE,
BROKEN WINDOWS, BLUE LIVES MATTER,
LAW ABIDING LIVES MATTER



(Wednesday June 3, 2015 The Bronx, NYC)  Policing New York City, has always been a dangerous, gritty, often violent endeavor; one taken up by men and women of a certain mindset.  It is not a profession for the faint of heart.  It requires a wide array of innate character traits, specialized skills acquired in the Police Academy and then on the streets, as well as a mature temperament.  The NYPD by and large only admits to the Academy those men and women who have passed the initial screening process including the physical and psychological testing prerequisites.  As any Cop would say, his or her real training began once they graduated from the Academy and began their first posting in a precinct.  It is at that time each newly minted Cop must pass the most difficult tests, those monitored by the veteran Cops they work with.  Those tests administered daily can make or break a career by weeding out those who simply are not suited for the work, those who will never be trusted by their peers to be reliable partners or good street Cops.

There was a time in the NYPD, up until the early 1980’s, when the unwritten rule among veterans was that it took seven years for a rookie to lose that status and be fully embraced and truly called a peer.  The thinking was that within a seven year time frame every rookie would have at least been exposed to as many facets of the Job, as many situations and scenarios and have proved their mettle under pressure and the close observational scrutiny of the veterans they worked with. 

THE SEVEN YEAR BAPTISM

Armed with nothing more than the fundamentals of the law and the basic skills, the rookie must prove themselves every day.  That each of them pass muster, so to speak, among the veterans who supervise and work with them, is essential.  During those years each Cop hones their physical skills, their abilities to control an arrest, deal with a crowd, rapidly process often conflicting observational stimuli, and the dozens of other unconscious and subconscious abilities that collectively evolve into real, reliable, actionable, instinct and intuition; the capability to know and feels the streets, the mood in the air, the wafting scents of impending danger all of which come together to make a Police Officer a Cop.

THE AMORAL APPROACH TO URBAN POLICING: STAND DOWN

Anyone who even pays the most minimal attention to the news knows that the incontrovertible decline in crime over the last 20 years here in NYC and in other large urban areas is beginning to be undone.  Politicians, pundits and so called “experts” have been flooding the airwaves and taking to the editorial pages to offer their opinions and theories regarding the increase in crime, violent, gun-related crime in particular.  For all their talk, the veritable ocean of blather they spew, none come close to being objective and recognizing the undeniable reality on the streets.  While all these blowhards are busy making claims and skewing statistics and “trends” to support their pet theory, politicians such as NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio, prove themselves to be not only living in a parallel reality but also to be apologists, imbeciles, and spineless.  Some of Mayor de Blasio’s recent comments not only contradict each other, they are so far from the truth that he may as well be speaking about crime on Mars.

Never one to let an opportunity to lambast Cops pass by even the President of the United States views the spikes in crime rates as a matter of more stringent “gun control”.  The absurdity of his statements alone disqualify him from having any “bully pulpit” from which to offer anything positive to the debate that is simmering towards a boil over Police practices, policies and procedures.  President Obama, rather than support Law Enforcement, has chosen to condemn the police and call for a “softer police presence” in crime riddled areas such as Baltimore, a city that just weeks ago saw some of the most destructive civil unrest in decades.  Baltimore, a city that had a dramatic increase in shootings and shooting deaths in May, the highest single month totals in over 25 years.  But the story of Baltimore is a story for another time.  It is mentioned here merely as an example of a city gripped by the scourge of street crime and a Police Department under fire – literally – and asked to “stand down”.  Even the police Commissioner of the Baltimore PD, Anthony Batts, admits the low morale of his police Officers, he refuses to address the morality or rather the immorality of allowing his Officers to take a hands off approach to street crime.  Instead he and Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake are welcoming in the Department of Justice to conduct a “review” of all aspects of the BPD.  If that is not demoralizing to the rank and file MOS, what is?

THE CURTAILING OF “SQF”: CAUSE AND EFFECT

Born out of the tried and true implementation of the “Broken Windows Theory”, the practice of “Stop, Question, and Frisk” was a powerful tool in the operational tactics of the NYPD.  When then candidate de Blasio predicated virtually his entire electoral platform on the elimination of “SQF” he was widely lauded as a true “progressive” who recognized that “SQF” had outgrown its legitimacy in NYC. The New York City de Blasio inherited was the safest large city in the USA.  Crime rates across all major categories were at 30, 40 and 50 year lows.  The Broken Windows Theory and “SQF” were the double barreled practices that rescued our City from the dreadful abyss it was poised to fall into when Rudy Giuliani became Mayor.  His Police Commissioner at that time was the same man on the 13th floor of One Police Plaza, Bill Bratton. (We’ll not address the well-known Giuliani/Bratton divorce nor the Bratton of today who appears to have sold his soul to be NYPD Commissioner).

The results of Broken Windows tactics and “SQF” in NYC were nothing short of astounding.  Quickly they were adopted by Police Departments in other major cities across the country.  Only a fool or moron could dispute the sheer effectiveness of these two policies.  But since candidate de Blasio has become Mayor de Blasio, a cold bucket of the water of reality has been dumped over his head.  Clearly his ambitious “progressive agenda” the centerpiece of which was “reforming” the NYPD (reforming?!) has unceremoniously backfired as any Cop could have predicted it would.

“SQF” was beyond question the single most significant factor for getting illegal guns off our streets.  Although nothing seems capable of staunching the flow of illegal handguns up the Interstate 95 Corridor destined for NYC, once in the hands of the criminal element here, thousands of such guns were confiscated during “SQF” incidences.  As many Democratic, Liberal and Progressive politicians, “activists”, ministers, and commentators had applauded the curtailing of “SQF” after a controversial court ruling last year, the same rationale de Blasio cited for his efforts in the elimination of “SQF”, some of these vary same actors in neighborhoods that are experiencing the highest upticks in violent crime are calling for de Blasio to “bring back SQF”.

Long time and long winded opponents of SQF initially celebrated during the time the NYPD was allegedly “standing down” as a silent protest against a Mayor they have little to no respect for.  The activists lauded the fact that the almost total abandonment of SQF, fewer police interactions with the public and a dramatic decrease in everyday arrests, did not result in higher crime numbers.  Confident they were witnessing living proof of their position; they clearly were blind to the reality of a less active Police force in NYC.  Gradually the numbers began to creep up; there were several high profile shooting incidents, broad daylight attacks on Officers on patrol, and in several precincts in The Bronx and Brooklyn, gunfire was returning to the soundtrack of life on those streets. The stark, bloody reality of fewer arrests was beginning to rear its ugly head. 

Policing is an integral component of a civil society fulfilling a mission that is simultaneously hazardous and thankless.  In our City of over eight million diverse residents, without a proactive NYPD we will most definitely continue to see crime and violence escalate.  Summer is fast approaching; a season that typically has the highest rates of street crime. This is clearly not the time to be seeking widespread “reforms” of the strategy and tactics of our Police Department.












Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2015 © All Rights Reserved