Showing posts with label Cultural Observation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cultural Observation. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

CHURCH SHOOTING IN SOUTH CAROLINA: NEW DEBATE ON THE SAME OLD FLAG?



THE FLAG IS NOT THE ISSUE

IT’S A MATTER OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH

SOUTH CAROLINA GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY CALLS FOR REMOVAL

OF CONFEDERATE BATTLE FLAG FROM STATEHOUSE GROUNDS


TAGS: SC CHURCH SHOOTING, CHARLESTON SOUTH CAROLINA, SIGNS AND SYMBOLS

OF THE CONFEDERACY, THE CONFEDERATE STATES DURING THE CIVIL WAR,

WAR BETWEEN THE STATES, FREEDOM OF SPEECH, FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION,

CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED



(Wednesday June 24, 2015 Charleston, SC)  As the families and friends of the victims of the fatal shooting of nine black parishioners at the Mother Emanuel AME Church here one week ago during a weekly Bible study meeting, their deaths have ignited a public/political debate focusing on what is being called the enduring symbol of institutionalized discrimination in the Deep South (and beyond), the Battle Flag of the Confederacy.  Here in South Carolina the Confederate flag flies on the grounds of the State Capitol while in several other states such as Georgia and Mississippi, the “stars and bars” are incorporated into the state flag. Long considered an emblem of defiance and rebellion not only in the former Confederate states, the flag remains an issue of great sensitivity to many and in particular African Americans across the country.  For those it is an insulting and offensive symbol of what they feel was the primary purpose of the “War Between The States”, keeping slavery legal in the South.

There is no small measure of irony in that a racist 22 year old’s individual psychotic hateful psyche led him to commit mass murder in a Black Church has resulted in prompting an Instamatic cultural and political debate over the Confederate flag. Dylann Roof, a lone disturbed, if not deranged young man accomplished in one bloody heinous act of violence what over 150 years of legislation, Supreme Court rulings, affirmative action, the Voter’s and Civil Rights Acts of the mid 1960’s, and a long list of other actions, initiatives, programs and policies intended to improve the lot for African Americans could not; the flag itself was being scrutinized not only for what it represents historically but also what it signifies today particularly among hate groups, white supremacists, and other marginalized violent movements.

Within hours of the deadly attack South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley announced that she would begin the effort to have the Confederate flag removed from the State House grounds but cautioned that the matter would have to be addressed by the South Carolina State Congress. Other states will face similar challenges in their own efforts to have the flag and other monuments, large and small honoring the Confederacy, removed from highly visible state government property.  The arguments pro and con each have merit but the entire issue ultimately can be reduced to a matter of Freedom of Speech, one of our most cherished constitutionally guaranteed rights.  The lower Courts and the Supreme Court over the years have protected what some group or another sees as heinous acts of expression invoking the Freedom of Speech as the shield providing such legal security.

In the week since the deadly shooting several of the largest retailers have announced they will no longer produce or carry in their stores items of all kinds that have the Confederate battle flag displayed.  A discussion has begun in Washington, DC about the propriety of some of the statues and painting adorning the corridors in our nation’s Capital, federally controlled public parks and other historical Civil War sites.  In states across the South buildings such as schools and local government seats of power that are named for noteworthy Confederate generals, early discussions to have them be renamed have begun.  Essentially some seek to have all traces of the Civil War no matter their nature banished from public sight forever.  Obviously this nascent discussion will open a virtual “Pandora’s Box” that will have each side of the argument deeply entrenched in their beliefs with little or no room for compromise. 

We can readily concede that the Confederate flag is an offensive reminder of one of the most ignoble, infamous chapters of our Country’s history almost akin to the systematic genocide that basically eradicated the Native Americans who’d inhabited this land long before it was ever discovered by Europeans.  An entire civilization, an enormous population was killed off under the guise of “Manifest Destiny”.  That centuries spanning atrocity is the “original sin” of the United States.  The practice of enslaving Africans to work the fields in the Deep South and, for a time, in factories in the North, has left the unhealed wound of a legacy the repercussions of which are in evidence today; institutional and societal shadows of racism regarding Black America are alive and well throughout all aspects of life today.  The irony in this reality is that in this day of the second term of the first African American President racial discord and episodes of outright bigotry and racism have emerged with many of these instances brought to the fore in the media.  For many in the Black communities from coast to coast the imagery depicting their plight has been a well-kept secret from the majority of Americans, namely, White Americans.   The importance of these issues is certainly of greater significance than the question of the displaying of the Confederate flag.  Banning the public display of the flag is but a cosmetic gesture of a reactionary moment.  Flag or no flag African Americans still must confront overt and insidious forms of discrimination, racial profiling in some very limited aspects of law enforcement, and in White society at large.

The question that needs to be engaged by all Americans is the meaning of Freedom of Speech.  The Supreme Court has upheld the legality of many open forms of public expression that many find deplorable, disgusting, unacceptable and unpatriotic.  The burning of the American flag is a protected legal form of expression as are any number of signs, insignia, acts of civil disobedience, highly inflammatory rhetoric, and what some consider offensive behavior are just some of the acts of expression deemed to be covered by Freedom of Speech.  The flying of the Confederate flag is no less a form of expression, an act of Freedom of Speech, than any of the other questionable yet legal practices so common in public throughout the USA. 

People of good will can engage in debate, politicians will take whatever the path of least resistance provides them political expediency in this topic of the Confederate flag but such pandering or divisiveness has little bearing on the reality of life in America in 2015. 

The last 12 months alone have been crudely punctuated by episodes of young Black unarmed men being killed by White LEO’s.  While this is an entirely different discussion and one that the Brooding Cynyc has addressed here previously, the ease with which the wounds of racism have been once again been ripped open are tangible examples at how far the gulf between White America and Black America is in some jurisdictions.

An odd backdrop to race relations today is that Black Americans serve at the highest levels in government and the private sector.  The “pop culture” of today’s youth is clear evidence of the phenomenon known as the “Blackafiscation” of America.  From music to fashion Black entertainers, athletes, celebrities, and others prominent in the culture geared to our youth, have a huge impact on White youth.  This has been a trend that began more than 20 years ago and it shows no sign of tapering off.  Sadly, some of the most powerful cultural influences at work on Black and White youth focuses and glamorizes the worst aspects of inner city life; “Ghettoization” in many respects only serves to reinforce White adult’s worst notions about young Black men and, in many fundamental ways only further marginalizes them.  White kids can don the apparel of the “streets”, the “hood” but, once they take off those cloths they are White and do not face the same social challenges that Black youths do in attempting to gain employment and many other important facets of adulthood.

So for this latest moment in our struggle with race the Confederate flag is the issue du jour. Like racism itself it will not die a quiet, easy death; there will no doubt be vigorous debates and discussions and it will take a great deal of effort to have it and other “tributes” to the Confederacy eliminated from public property.  As the presidential primary season begins to ramp up late next month the flag issue will no doubt be used as a litmus test.  That might be a good thing since so often political primaries are such monumental wastes of time, money, and can profoundly alienate voters already apathetic to the concept that their vote matters.

We will see what we will see…



































Thursday, November 20, 2014

MEDIA CIRCUS RAMPING UP IN FERGUSON



FERGUSON READIES FOR ACT TWO
MEDIA DESCENDS ON SMALL TOWN AGAIN.

TAGS:  MICHAEL BROWN, POLICE OFFICER DARREN WILSON,
FERGUSON MISSOURI, GRAND JURY, CIVIL UNREST, MEDIA HYPE,
MEDIA IRRESPONSIBILITY, MEDIA MAKING THE STORY,
SOCIAL COMMENT, CULTURAL OBSERVATION






(Thursday November 20, 2014, Ferguson, MO) It’s a cool 36 degrees on the ground here and the night comes on fast.  People out on the streets are bundled up in heavy coats, woolen hats, scarves and gloves.  They seem to move at a faster pace in the cold then they did when this community made its original introduction to the rest of America.  Given the atmospherics here literally and metaphorically, this cold winter weather may come as a blessing for when “The Announcement” comes.  Of course we are referring to “The Announcement” as to whether or not the St. Louis County Grand Jury empaneled to hear and see the evidence in the case of the White Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson and decide if he should be criminally indicted for the shooting death of the young Black man who was unarmed, Michael Brown last August 9th.  For variously suspect to patently absurd reasons officials here from the Governor Jay Nixon down to the County and Ferguson Police Department Chiefs have been publically extolling all the “measures” they’ve taken to cover every possible contingency once the Grand Jury’s findings are made public.  There is a self-perpetuating element to this kind of lead up to a lead up to a possible event; preparing for potential public disorder and discussing it so publically in the media seems to be almost inviting trouble. 

Perhaps the authorities see their public pronouncements as good public service as well as a warning to anyone, especially “outside agitators” who might want to travel to Ferguson, co-mingle with peaceful demonstrators and incite violence; violence against what is perceived as a “militarized” police force here in this community north of St. Louis.  There were some chaotic nights in the immediate aftermath of the death of Mr. Brown but it never evolved into full scale rioting.  It appeared at times that each side, the protestors and the Police were parrying with each other, collectively bobbing and weaving as boxers do in the early rounds as they try to size up and get the range on their opponent.  It could have gotten very nasty very quickly but neither side was really up for that kind of fight.  The 54 member Ferguson Police Department was clearly overwhelmed and, if only for crowd control purposes, needed the reinforcements from the St. Louis County Police, Missouri State Police and a small National Guard contingent to man an operations center.  The media presence, at times, appeared to dwarf the number of protestors as the days wore on. 

Now the media have begun to trickle back.  They broadcast live on the evening “news” standing in front of boarded up businesses; businesses apparently expecting trouble to follow the Grand Jury’s findings. In this bizarre world we live today the media are often the story or they at least promulgate a nugget of innuendo, rumor, supposition or some “anonymous source” and conflate it into a story.  They no longer cover or report the “news”.  No, they are much more than pure journalists and reporters; they are TV personalities, celebrities and any corner of our culture any dark hole in society that they chose to illuminate with their klieg lights becomes news.

Yes, now they are back sticking microphones into anyone’s face that slows down enough to be ambushed.  Then again, there is something alluring, something magnetic about the idea of being seen on TV that is difficult to understand. It is akin to an intoxicant for many and a validation of something, (?) for many more,  We are a TV, media, Facebook, Skype, YouTube culture so perhaps it is understandable why people so eagerly appear on TV even in the midst of their greatest tragedies and losses. And, the media is fully cognizant of this fact.  They really need not ambush anyone except some sleazy politico caught with his hand in the bag trying to duck out the side door of The Capitol.  No, most folks seem to want to be on TV no matter the cause, purpose or how much of themselves, self-dignity or self-regard they will ultimately surrender.  Just look at “The Jerry Springer Show” or “Maury”.

So the celebrity reporters are trolling the streets speaking with locals.  They have found every gun shop in the greater St. Louis Area to report that gun sales have jumped by 700%! And that most of their newest customers are women.  Yes, this is the setting the media is preparing.

HYPE

In the weeks leading up to a major pay per view prizefight, the broadcasting network will hype the event with what can seem like continuous airings of the fighter’s profiles down to the minutest details of their lives and careers.  Fights, prize or otherwise, lend themselves to hype, they are the physical confrontation of two men, mano y mano, on a grand and glitzy stage broadcast worldwide, wagered on and highly anticipated.  The hype is the vehicle to build anticipation.  As fight night drawers closer, the hype is knocked up a gear into overdrive and the anticipation is at its peak.  Often the fight does not come anywhere near matching the hype but, when it does, it is a special sporting moment in the most solo of singular sports.

For the last four weeks the newsertainment outlets have begun hyping an event that typically is not a reason for hype.  But, in the dizzied, never-ending, 24/7 cable news, breaking news, continuing coverage, live on location, breathlessly hyperbolic environment we live in, anything can be hyped regardless of whether or not it should be.  Hype impacts our lives at every turn and sometimes we fail to recognize that we are being fed hype.  Because the 24/7 worth of airtime to fill the cable “news” outlets need to make mountains out of molehills; they need to have a flashy graphic with appropriately moody music for the intro to “the latest development” despite the fact that the latest development has been the latest development for 8 or 9 hours.  The repetition of the hype and hyperbole provides the background din in American culture.

TIMING

If there is one thing everyone in the Law Enforcement Community is well aware of is that the long, hot nights of summer, those humid sticky nights that top off the ends of blistering heat are the toughest times in the City.  The heat of passion is sometimes just the passion of heat.  So, in that regard it is fortunate that the Grand Jury findings will be released in the middle of the harsh November chill that has settled over most of the country and is certainly carried on the cold winds that come out of the northwest.

Ferguson on a night like this seems like a sodium arc lamp lit ghost town.  Very few pedestrians walk the streets; the few that do have their shoulders hunched into the collars of their coats against the cold.  The traffic is very light and all appears peaceful.  Smoke wafts out of chimneys and the houses and apartments are alit from within.  This weather does not seem very conducive to any kind of long term outdoor nocturnal demonstrations no matter what the findings are. 

There have been reports that cities across America are preparing for some possibility of “isolated social unrest” in their Black communities if Officer Wilson is not indicted.  Those Officials in cities such as Cleveland, Chicago, Buffalo and all across the Midwest, into the northeast and down into Dixie will have the frigid temperatures on their sides; it’s far easier to get riled up and hoot and holler when it’s 85 degrees than it is when it is 20 degrees.

TRUTH

Hopefully those citizens who comprise the Grand Jury in this case have been taking their task seriously.  Most Grand Juries do. While not sequestered they have been instructed by the Judge to avoid any accounts of the case in the media but, naturally, they live in the real world, work in the real world, and cannot avoid all the coverage.  The best they can do is remain ever objective.  Objectivity and rigorous adherence to the facts, not disputed information, simply the empirical facts, will lead them to the truth.  Whatever that truth is or is not let it not be exploited by anyone on either side of the racial divide, the gaping maw of distrust between the African American communities and the Law Enforcement Community across this country.  There has been ample exploitation here already.










Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2014 © All Rights Reserved