Tuesday, January 7, 2014

THANK YOU JUDGE TOMEI




BROOKLYN SUPREME COURT JUSTICE
SAYS THE RIGHT WORDS
JUSTICE ALBERT TOMEI MADE HIS FEELINGS KNOWN
TODAY WHILE SENTENCING THE THUG WHO SHOT
NYPD COP IN THE HEAD

TAGS: BROOKLYN JUSTICE ALBERT TOMEI, NYPD SGT. KEVIN BRENNAN,
ORTIZ SENTENCING, “COPS, COURTS & CORRECTIONS”
AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE, CRIMINAL CODE, MAGNA CARTA,
TRIPARTITE SYSTEM OF THE THREE C’s



(Tuesday January 7, 2014 Brooklyn Criminal Court, NYC)  As the young NYPD Officer, Sgt. Kevin Brennan sat with his wife just a few rows behind the evil thug found guilty of shooting him in the head on January 31, 2012, Justice Albert Tomei rendered his sentence to Luis Ortiz earlier today.  In a forthright, blunt manner Justice Tomei told the convicted murderer "You will, in light of this sentence, spend the rest of your life in a soulless, loveless, compassionless environment”, giving Ortiz, previously convicted of murder, a “life without parole” sentence.

The story here is not about a life long, hard core murderous criminal being sentenced to life without parole for shooting Sgt. Brennan but rather how important it was that Justice Tomei added his personal remarks prior to reading the actual sentence.  For far too long New Yorkers have watched from the sidelines as liberal judges have given light sentences to men convicted of atrocious acts of brutality and cold-heartedness.  We have had to observe over the years one instance after another when a Judge would set a very low bail virtually assuring the offender would be bonded out and would than simply vanish.  We have seen the miscarriages of justice and have repeatedly been puzzled, left scratching and shaking our heads while wondering “what the hell is wrong with our criminal justice system”?    The fact of the matter is that there is plenty very “wrong” with our criminal justice system and it was at least for a brief moment refreshing to hear justice Tomei’s words; words that many of us would have spoken – perhaps in more colorfully profane language – if we were in a position to do so.    Tomei’s words expressed the frustration that we have all felt at one time or another over the inadequacies of the Courts to do the bidding of law abiding citizens; a Court system that all too often appears to afford more rights to the defendant instead of the victim.

 THE THREE “CS”: COPS, COURTS & CORRECTIONS

When we discuss the criminal justice system we need to know precisely what it is we are evaluating.  In our Democratic Republic the “System” is comprised of three distinct entities.  The first is the Police, the men and women in Police and Sheriff’s departments as well as all other law enforcement Agencies (LEA).  The Police respond to citizens calls, are dispatched to crimes in progress and scenes of crimes; conduct investigations and make arrests.  At this point the Courts take over.  The Courts are the Prosecutors, the District Attorneys and Magistrates who preside over the legal process.  It is often at this level that the system seems to go awry.  In accordance with our Constitution and well established practice of jurisprudence, all proceedings at this level are well codified and defined.  Public Defenders are provided for defendants unable to afford private legal representation.  At this level the often sloppy, clumsy process, a process largely driven by expediency and budgets, appears to the uninitiated to break down.  Pleas are proffered to defendants that typically result in a plea bargain.  If a defendant is found guilty or accepts the plea offer, a sentence is imposed by the Court.  Sentences range largely in accordance to the crime.  One could be sentenced to community service, probation or a short stay in a County jail or sent to a state or federal penitentiary.  In some of our United States the penalty of “death” is a viable option for a judge to impose and for a Prosecutor to request.  However, even in the ever shrinking number of States that have that carry out the death penalty, it typically takes anywhere from 10 to 20 years for the “appeals” process to wind its way through all the layers of lower to higher Courts.

The final phase in this process is what is euphemistically designated as “Corrections”.  Each State has a Department of Corrections (DOC) and many Counties, Parishes, and larger Cities have a Department of Corrections of their own. DOC’s are tasked with carrying out a sentence be it probation or long term incarceration.  This is another facet of the system that appears to be extremely flawed in many ways.  From County Jails to State Prisons there is an epidemic of overcrowding, under-staffing, budget cuts and woefully inadequate use of scarce resources.  In some ways our Correctional institutions have become nothing more than warehouses for the mentally ill; albeit, mentally ill individuals who have been found guilty of a crime.  The burdens placed on DOC’s across the country are often beyond a facility’s ability to address.  Because of the myriad stresses and strains on DOC’s there are many disturbing cases when violent inmates were paroled early only to commit another heinous act in short order.  The costs of incarceration are staggering at every level from County to State to Federal Penitentiaries.  But, this is the system we have.  This is the reality in America and to address the ailments of any of the “Three Cs” one must also consider their relationship to the other two.   Each is inextricably linked to the other and a holistic approach is the only way to make the system run more effectively, efficiently and safely.

BLINDING JUSTICE

Justice is said to be blind and that she may be.  At times it appears that she is deaf and dumb as well.  The scales she holds balanced in her hands in statues and paintings are rarely equally balanced in reality.  The scales seem subjected to the shifting weights of expediency and politics whims.  Justice, for all she represents in our Courts today does not view us all as equals under the law. 

The Courts are at the pinnacle of our tripartite legal system. The men and women, the Justices and Judges that preside over them have historically held above repute, as honest, impartial arbiters of the laws of our land.  Our entire criminal justice system is rooted in the Old English document the Magna Carta written in 1215 AD which came to codify criminal and civil law for most of the Western World.  The Magna Carta in a way provides a job description for Judges and all “High Officers” of the Court.  But increasingly over the last forty years we have been left to feel disappointed at best, outraged at worst by failures of our Courts to mete out what the majority considers to be commensurate with the crime.  We have seen verdicts that defy simple logic as well as our inherent sense of fairness.

There have been numerous cases in which “activist Judges”, those who feel the “Law” is open to their interpretation rather than the strict boundaries of our Constitution, criminal and civil codes.  There have been Judges who felt compelled to correct what they perceived as being some distant legacy of injustice.  Yes, this works both ways; some Courts have been very lenient and others very harsh.  If the scales of justice were truly balanced the instances of this type would not be as common as they continue to be.

That was why Justice Tomei’s words were so powerfully refreshing.  He spoke his mind and heart to an already convicted and sentenced murder and sent him off to an upstate penitentiary with a fairly accurate description of what that scumbag’s life will be like.  We have seen liberal Judges in New York City conduct business as if the victims are not worthy of having all the equal protections under the law afforded to them while some young ACLU attorney represents the offender just to gain enough courtroom experience to move on after a few short years in the Public Defender’s Office.

From the early 1970’s until his retirement, a Judge in the Bronx County Courthouse named Bruce Wright presided over many an arraignment, worked “night court” and served as a trial Judge.  Judge Wright became known as “Let ‘em Loose Bruce” for his infamous reputation to treat truly dangerous, hardened criminals very easily.  In the winter of 1972 there was a young NYPD Officer patrolling with his partner a sector in the 41st Precinct in the Bronx.  As they slowed cruised up and down the cold, dark, cracked and potholed asphalt streets, narrow corridors lined with tenements, burned out shells of buildings and vacant lots they rolled past a tavern.  As was their custom they stopped their patrol car outside until the bartender made eye contact with whoever was driving and gave either a thumbs up or thumbs down signal.  Obviously, if PO Dowd and his partner did not get a distinct thumb up they could assume that something was amiss and would enter the tavern to see what was what.

On that fateful night near 2 o’clock in the morning they made eye contact with the bartender and received no signal whatsoever.  They “smelled” trouble and proceeded to enter the tavern.  Immediately as Dowd entered the tiny barroom he was shot with a sawed off shotgun at point blank range in the abdomen.  This assailant fled, the call from Central Dispatch was transmitted across the Bronx and the actual perpetrator was apprehended within hours.

The alleged perpetrator was brought before Judge Bruce Wright who set bail so low that the suspect was able to post bond – make bail – and was released back onto the streets within hours of shooting a uniformed NYPD Officer during the commission of a robbery.  Well, that was the last time that particular suspect was ever seen again.  Let ‘em Loose Bruce had struck again it was the shooting of Denny Dowd that came to be the template to measure the efficacies of the NYC Courts.  (Denny Dowd did recovery after several surgical procedures a long convalescence and rehabilitation.  He never returned to NYPD because his injuries had rendered him medically unqualified).


Detective Sgt. Kevin Brennan (second from right) and his wife Janet (wiping tear)
 in Brooklyn Supreme Court on Tuesday for Luis Ortiz sentencing.
Aaron Showalter/New York Daily News


NYPD Officer Kevin Brennan was conducting “vertical patrol” in one of the apartment buildings that comprise the Bushwick Houses project in Brooklyn. AS walked down the stairs from the roof he interdicted several young men virtually all of whom quickly vanished when they saw the uniformed Officer approaching.  Luis Ortiz who had murdered a man just a month earlier crossed paths with Brennan and in that fateful moment Ortiz shot Brennan in the head.  Brennan began chasing Ortiz but his wound and blood loss were bringing closer to his own death.  Miraculously he survived and has since been promoted to Sergeant and is assigned to a position at One Police Plaza.

He lived to tell and testify in Court the circumstances of their encounter, how he was shot and that Ortiz said, “Fuck you, die” after he shot Brennan.

This story outraged a City but, as we have endured before, there was no expectation that the wheels of justice would move swiftly in this case.  Thanks to Justice Tomei who runs a “tight ship” in his Courtroom, has a stellar reputation for his no nonsense presiding style and wealth of judicial experience, in this case the system worked about as swiftly as it ever can.

We hope “Baby” Ortiz does, as Justice Tomei advised, “spend the rest of your life in a soulless, loveless, compassionless environment."  We need more Judges and Justices of Tomei’s integrity, professionalism in our Courtrooms all across our Five Boroughs.














Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2014 © All Rights Reserved


Tuesday, December 31, 2013

2013: THE YEAR OF THE BULLY



OF BYTES & BULLYS

It cannot all be blamed on the Internet.
Parents really need to step up and into their children’s lives.




TAGS: TEEN BULLYING, CYBER BULLYING, TEEN PRESSURES,

DESENSITIZED YOUTH, MALADJUSTED FOR ACTUAL SOCIALIZATION,

TEACHING REAL VALUES IN THE HOME, PERSONAL ACCOUNTABILITY



(Tuesday December 31, 2013 Anytown, USA)   This is the time of year when every news media outlet, magazine, publication and tabloid rate the best and worst of the year just about to be concluded.  TIME magazine names their “Person of the Year” and there are endless lists and ranking of trends, fads and milestones in pop culture and our society as a whole. There are seemingly endless lists of winners and losers, of those to watch in the upcoming year and those that imploded in the one about to end. Some lists rate the best and worst news photos, defining moments in national and world events, politics, fame and infamy. There are no stones left unturned in this oddball subjective annual craze.  From top notch sports teams and individual athletes, to journalists, politicians and, of course, that uniquely American breed that is considered “celebrity” for no apparent reason other than earning the ersatz tiara of celebrity. This is a ritual practice and often sheds light on some aspects of our lives and times that would otherwise remain unnoticed by the majority.  Typically, The Brooding Cynyx refrain from this annual ritual compiling lists of Best This and Worst That and have generally avoided getting caught up in the muck and mire, the hype and hyperbole that others in the media seem to thrive on when it comes to quantifying, qualifying, critiquing, assessing and summarizing.

But this year is a bit different for us; this last twelve months have brought us events and stories that have compelled us to affix a label to 2013: we have designated it “The Year of the Bully”.  This year has been tragically wrought by far too many stories of young lives destroyed, ruined and taken due to bullying.   Technology and all its unintended consequences contribute to and add a level of stress in the lives of our teens never before possible.  Now awkward adolescent moments can be caught on a cell phone camera and Tweeted, texted and shared in a truly viral form reaching an audience of dozens or hundreds within minutes.  These moments are forever alive in whatever digital devices they have traveled though, the “social networks” that facilitate their spread and, in what becomes for many, the loss of the ability or means to defend themselves. 

OH HOW THE TIMES HAVE CHANGED

In his brilliantly written 2001 book “Wireless Nation”, James B. Murray, Jr tells the fascinating story of the cell phone industry in America having been involved in it for over two decades, the time that took a concept that many in the communications and technology fields said was not viable, to the full out bandwidth wars between the “telcom” carriers. In the 1980’s one would have been hard pressed to find any serious support from investors for a national cellular network.  Most of the heavy hitters in the industry from AT&T to a number of venture-capital backed startups simply lacked the vision to see beyond the familiar horizon.  Those that had that foresight and vision took cellular communications technology from a small novel gadget accessible only to the very rich and nurtured it into what it has become today; a global force that has even defied “Moore’s Law” regarding the exponential growth of digital capacity.  Cell phones have come a long way from their brick-like clumsiness of the late 1980’s into ultra-slim, lightweight, miniature computers with a broad array of capacities and applications.  Cell phones have come to replace “landlines” in each of the last 4 years at a rate near 40% annually.  Cellular is now the standard, now the norm.

But, as we have seen time and time again, the Law of Unintended Consequences is as embedded in our sophisticated technologies just as are the nano-sized silicon chips that make them operate as they do. Virtually every cell phone today has a camera built in and, with the explosive rise of “social networks” in just the last six years our connectivity has exceeded everyone’s wildest imaginations from the engineers behind the hardware and software, the carriers, investors and this connectivity has forever changed the world in which we live.  Cellular technology has “downsized” the Earth.  With the proper equipment, either a cell or satellite phone, there is nowhere on the planet that is too remote to not be accessible.  So too is it that even within the realm of proximity there is a connectedness that no one could have truly anticipated and is just now beginning to be understood on many levels.

We are all aware of what is happening in this regard.  No matter where we live or work, how we commute or communicate, cellular technology is ubiquitously obvious, often intrusively so, in America today.  This reality is particularly evidenced in our children, adolescents and teenagers all seem to be forever listening through ear buds to music while texting and Tweeting friends that might be as close as the next table in the cafeteria.  Through the social networks they are tethered to each other and can share anything from simple messages and video clips, to “selfies”, games and any of the over 400,000 apps now available for cell phones, sleek multiuse “pads” and “tablets” as well as the growing array of other hybrid miniaturized digital devices.

All of this advanced technology has created platforms for new ways to bully, embarrass, harass, tease, taunt and otherwise ridicule anyone.  As if being a teenager wasn’t already sufficiently laden with the awkward, often difficult process of maturing, socialization and taking the first small steps into hormonally-charged new vistas of fear or desire or identity, now anyone else, a classmate, neighbor or stranger on the subway, can document it moment by moment and share it for all the world to see if they so choose.  Any awkward moment, any mistake, miscue or misstep that every teen has ever made, can be captured for posterity’s sake or posted on YouTube for the enjoyment of others.  Total strangers are interacting via social networks in truly “viral” ways that are more susceptible to be malignant than benign.  What one person finds embarrassing can be viewed a virtually unlimited number of others on the small cellphone screens they appear to be riveted to despite what other activity they may be involved in.

Up until this new digital age the pitfalls and pains of the teen years where witnessed only by those in real proximity, in real time, in the actual physical presence of each other.  Then all a teen had to worry about was being the brunt of a joke, being humiliated for a few days on the school bus or just forced to suffer from the cruel exclusionary - inclusivity practiced by teenagers probably since time immemorial. Whatever the clumsy moment or prank played, its effects never transferred further than your neighborhood, school or immediate peers. The high school years are notoriously perilous and each of us either looks back on them with wistful pleasure or grinding anger or something in between.   But to have our lives open to a cruel sort of chroniclization is more than some teens can handle.

HOLD THE PHONE

Our technology is here to stay, there is no going back.  That some of our advancement in technology has created some fallout is not a broad condemnation.  It is merely stating the obvious, an after effect that can linger dangerously in cyberspace and have a detrimental influence on our children during their most formative and impressionable years. Is our “culture” or society to blame?  Can we pin this disturbing trend of digital bullying on poor parenting skills? Broken families?  Who knows?  We do have a tendency in this country to extrapolate from the micro to the macro, from the local to the national, from the rare and isolated to the common and pervasive when it comes to looking at aspects of our lives.  In this type of thinking there are inherent flaws and unquantifiable, unidentifiable variables that obscure other perspectives.  This also allows us to jump to conclusions and proffer assumptions that serve only to further confuse and muddle the issues.

Is our “culture” partially complicit?   Yes, in some ways.  Are our children growing up more familiar with strangers on social networks than with their own Moms and Dads, brothers and sisters, kids next door?  Sure, in many cases this is reality.  The pace of our lives today is astonishingly rapid and blurrily confusing to most people over 30; perhaps even 25.  It is hard to draw a generational line that demarcates the fork in the road that shunted us all onto the “Information Highway” of President Bill Clinton’s description yet maybe that was the point of bifurcation.  My generation did not grow up with any of the sophisticated technology that was still a distant dream to futurists and some in the fields of engineering, computer science and associated disciplines in the 1950’s and ‘60’s.  We had a black and white TV, three major networks and a rotary dial phone hanging on the wall in the kitchen.  We went to libraries to get information for homework and projects, learned to type, used carbon paper and made mimeograph copies.  In high school we took chemistry, calculus and physics with a slide ruler and scratch paper.  In the simple linear nature of human and technological progress the road ahead seemed natural enough; a ride up a gently slopped gradient of advance that made our lives easier and impressed us mightily.  We put a man on the moon in 1969 with no more computing power available on the Lunar Module than in a common microwave oven of today.  We have not been back to the moon in decades however we have continually been moving forward and faster. 

OF VIDEOS AND VALUES

There is a large vocal chorus laying all of society’s and, in particular our youths behavior on “violent” video games, graphic 3 dimensional movies filled with blood and gore and how their intimacy with these realms merge and have “desensitized” the children born during and since the 1980’s.  This is a reasonable yet not complete assertion regarding some of the emerging trends evidenced by how our youth approach and perceive the wider world. Their experiences have largely been in relationships with the digitalized parallel universe of cyberspace in all its unlimited vistas.  Certainly they are less well adapted, socialized, than we were.  Yes, their endless hours travelling the social networks, gaming sites, chat rooms, Facebook pages, web sites has desensitized them, it can be argued, as have the real life news reporting from war zones around the world. 

There appears to be the absence of a contravening force, any counterbalancing influence.  This is not the fault of the nation as a whole.  It is foolish to believe so.   And this returns us to the “extrapolation affect”.  We see a truly tragic, reprehensible news item about a school shooting and immediately the hue and cry to enact stricter gun control, screen children for mental illness or arm teachers can be heard.  When we read about teens who had been the subject of intense cyber bullying who commits suicide automatically factions on both the political Left and Right toss out their own tired rhetorical grenades hoping to score political points and further fuel the flames of divisiveness that are constantly aglow just beneath the surface.  What has become of person accountability?  Why is it always a larger “them” to blame when it was just one person or a small number of people involved in the commission of whatever the  atrocity might be? 

The Right will blame the absence of “God” in our schools for all that ail our youth while the Left will stridently call for more regulation, laws and intervention.  In both cases everyone is attempting to find the needle of causation in the haystack of a diverse and disparate population of over 400 million Americans. 

What may be a beginning remedy must take place on the micro scale; at the level of individual families.  Our children need to be taught values and that does not refer to the gauzy material once taught in civics classes and Sunday schools.  Concepts of conscience, right and wrong, winners and losers should be instilled in our children to provide a counterweight to all they are consumed with in cyberspace and in their small cliques and groups.  There is a strain of “meanness”, of callousness and cruelty throughout our culture that is naturally absorbed by those in their formative years.  We live in a violent culture but, and this is no doubt a controversial point of view but, it is not nearly as violent, all things considered, as it could be.  Yes, every crime of violence, every act of cruelty is troublesome but, given the composition of our country thins could be much worse.

Statistics and metrics are malleable.  The numbers as illustrated in graphs and pie charts assembled by scholars and ‘experts’ in a wide range of disciplines can always find numbers to support their own beliefs or their favorite theory.  Statistics as collected and analyzed for academic monographs and peer reviewed journals are notoriously flawed particularly as when they are extracted from polling data and other subjective means of acquisition.  All the “Blue Ribbon Panels”, working groups and “national debate” engaged in amounts to just so much rubbish.  We don’t need a “national dialogue” about anything even if such an activity were even possible.  We have had far too much emphasis placed beyond an individual’s immediate reach, on factors and influences that are purportedly the cause of this or the reason for that.  Again, the responsibility for our children and how they develop rests with us.  Parents, Uncles, Aunts, Grandparents, our kin should have an active role with our children and extended family.  Yes, over the years there has been much made of the “broken home syndrome” and the single Mom scenario and these are indeed the root of some problems for some of our youth.  But many a good and decent child raised by a single parent, a grandparent or even an older sibling has developed into stable well-adjusted teen “normalcy”.

Perhaps the time has come for each of us to stop looking for the causes for what disturbs us about our youth’s indifference and behavior that may be completely baffling to us.  The causes may be much closer to home; perhaps rooted within the home and it is at that level we must approach the issues.  We must teach our children well.












Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2013 © All Rights Reserved

Friday, December 27, 2013

LONGTIME BRATTON ALLY RETURNING TO NYPD



MILLER MAKING FAMILIAR LEAP
This April 18, 2012, file photo, released by CBS shows John Miller on the set of "CBS This Morning," in New York. CBS News correspondent Miller has bounced between journalism and law enforcement for many years. Now he's jumping back to work for incoming New York City Police Commissioner William Bratton. CBS confirmed Miller's exit on Thursday, Dec. 26, 2013. Miller worked under Bratton when the incoming commissioner led the New York and Los Angeles police departments in the past.
CBS, HEATHER WINES, FILE — AP Photo

TAGS: NYPD, NYPD COMMISSIONER BILL BRATTON, LAPD, JOHN MILLER

JOURNALIST & CLOSE FRIEND OF BRATTON BACK TO NYPD, TRANSITION FROM KELLY

TO BRATTON, VULNERABILITY DURING TRANSITION, NYPD INTELLIGENCE DIVISION,

 NYPD COUNTER TERRORISM UNIT, IMPORTANCE OF CONTINUITY OF COMMAND,

Al QAEDA, 9-11-2001, SECURING OUR CITY





(Friday December 27, 2013, UES, NYC)  John Miller announced yesterday that he will be resigning from his job with CBS News to take a position as yet to be named, on Bill Bratton’s staff. There have been some rumors floated that Miller will have a position with the NYPD Counter Terrorism Unit although no one in a position to know is willing to confirm or deny these reports.  This is not the first time the former beat reporter for WNBC and ABC has left a position in journalism to follow his friend Bill Bratton. 

Miller became somewhat famous while working for the WNBC local newscast in New York City.  In the 1980’s he became easily recognizable to New Yorker’s due to his extensive coverage and oddly cordial on-air relationship with former Mafia Don, John Gotti.  During each of Gotti’s trials Miller enjoyed almost exclusive access to the “Teflon Don”, a moniker that Miller helped to promote.  There were many who credited Miller’s nonstop obsession with Gotti for helping Gotti, himself, a convicted killer, to become a household name throughout the New York City Metropolitan Area.  Miller used his access to Gotti to help the mobster to wear the persona of a local hero in some parts of the City, particularly in Little Italy and Brooklyn.  During those years however, many in the NYPD Organized Crime Task Force began viewing Miller as a shill for one of the most notoriously violent, ruthless, coldblooded Dons of La Cosa Nostra in the long and storied annals of Italian organized crime in NYC.

Miller enjoyed his notoriety and was often found late at night in some of the swankiest watering holes and restaurants of the Upper East Side.  When Mayor Rudy Giuliani appointed Bill Bratton as his Police Commissioner, Bratton tapped Miller to fill the post of NYPD Public Information Officer which was quickly re-designated as Deputy Commissioner for Public Information.  Bratton and Miller had become fast friends when Bratton was the Chief of the NYPD Transit Division a few years before becoming Commissioner for the first time.  Both men enjoyed the fine wining and dining they saw as the well-deserved “perks” of their jobs in One Police Plaza. In those days it was not uncommon to see Miller belligerently intoxicated, rude and boisterous waving around his Deputy Commissioner’s “Gold Shield” which is a grievous insult to members of NYPD and embarrassing for all to see.   As it turned out, Mayor Giuliani came to feel overshadowed by his Commissioner and asked for Bratton’s resignation.  Miller returned to his career as a journalist and his most famous coup was a sit down face to face interview (Link below) in 1998 with a lanky, soft spoken bearded Saudi millionaire living in caves and Bedouin-type tents in the rugged mountains of Afghanistan.  In that interview Osama bin Laden announced to the world his evil intentions but no one in our government took him seriously. In a few short years we would all bear witness to bin Laden’s commitment and handiwork.

JOINED AT THE HIP

While Bratton was making a very substantial living in the private sector as a consultant, Miller once again returned to TV journalism. In 2002 the newly elected Mayor of Los Angeles, James Hahn appointed Bratton as the Chief of Police of the perpetually troubled LAPD. Bratton named Miller as LAPD's chief of counterterrorism and criminal intelligence despite the fact that Miller was woefully unqualified for that position. Bratton’s tenure consisted of two five year terms that were viewed positively as his methods and tactics, the same he implemented under Giuliani in New York, did in fact reduce crime and reform much of the LAPD.  There is little known about Miller’s performance in Los Angeles aside from the fact that his ego and abrasive manner often found him alienated from the rank and file of LAPD and some members of the local press corps. 

When Bratton was denied the opportunity for a third term as LAPD Chief he once again found himself in a lucrative position working as a security consultant and keynote speaker on the circuit.  The former Boston street cop was travelling the world over and apparently enjoying the rewards of his years of public service. After Bratton’s departure from LA, Miller was appointed as Associate Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Analytic Transformation and Technology.  Prior to that, he was an Assistant Director of Public Affairs for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), where he was the bureau's national spokesman. Once again there is little known about his on the job performance in these postings but many former employees felt he got his high ranking positions via “personal and professional connections” and that “good people were passed over” to fill those jobs.

Once Bill de Blasio won the Mayoralty here last month it was just a matter of weeks before de Blasio named Bratton as the new Commissioner of the NYPD.  For many long time high ranking NYPD veterans, members of the “Upper Brass” and other observers, it was believed the appointment of Bratton was inevitability and would allow Miller to ride Bratton’s coattails back into a position of prominence in NYPD.  For the better part of the last 20 years, for the most part, where ever Bratton has gone Miller has followed.

As was reported here and elsewhere on December 19 two of Ray Kelly’s top staffers, Deputy Commissioner for Counterterrorism Richard Daddario, and Deputy Commissioner of Intelligence David Cohen were resigning effect immediately after Bill de Blasio is sworn in to Office.  The contributions these two men made to our City cannot be measured or quantified; they created the most effective and efficient municipal urban Intelligence Division and Counter Terrorism Units in the country if not the world.  Their absence will leave gapping voids in two of the most important Commands in NYPD in our post 9 – 11 world.  The notion that John Miller may be named as a replacement for one of these men is, as a Counter Terrorism Detective commented, “Absolutely ludicrous and, if it happens, it will be a huge, very large blunder on Bratton’s part.  I mean, these Units did not even exist as they are now when Bratton was here in 1996.  He has some very big shoes to fill and needs to fill all the vacancies that resignations and retirement are causing”.

The real issue at hand is not Bratton’s qualifications to lead NYPD but rather if he will have the same priorities that Kelly honored.  Certainly he will be quickly at odds with Mayor de Blasio given the fact that much of de Blasio’s campaign rhetoric and “promises” to the “minority” communities are diametrically opposite of Bratton’s philosophy, strategy and tactics he has employed in the past.  It is doubtful Bratton will morph into a “kinder, gentler” Commissioner just because de Blasio has repeatedly stated his intention to reform NYPD and broaden the scope of the Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB), revamp the “Stop, Question and Frisk” policy that has engendered so much animosity towards NYPD from factions of the African American and Latino population and otherwise make changes that will no doubt, if enacted, drastically alter the operations of NYPD as a whole and some of the most specialized Divisions and Units specifically.  Our city can ill afford a prolonged transitionary period from the Kelly era to the new Bratton regime.  Only time will tell if de Blasio made the proper choice with Bratton and if Bratton’s friend and ally, John Miller, is really up to the task.  Hopefully we’ll not learn the hard way.











(YouTube video of John Miller’s 1998 interview with Osama bin Laden link below)


Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2013 © All Rights Reserved