Showing posts with label Policing NYC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Policing NYC. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 8, 2014

INSECURE AIRSPACE ABOVE NYC?




HARMLESS HOBBYISTS PROVIDE
TERRORISTS WITH INTELLIGENCE
TERRORISTS TAKE NOTE OF RECENT

EPISODE ABOVE GWB.

RADIO CONTROLLED AIRCRAFT HOBBYISTS

UNINTENTIONALLY GIVE A DEMONSTRATION

ABOUT SECURITY OF AIRSPACE ABOVE NYC


TAGS: NYPD AVIATION DIVISION, RADIO CONTROLLED

AIRCRAFT, “NEAR MISS” NEAR GWB?,

NYPD INTELLIGENCE DIVISION, NYC METRO AREA

 THREE MAJOR AIRPORTS IN NYC METRO AREA


(Tuesday July 8, 2014, Upper Manhattan, NYC) Minutes after midnight yesterday an NYPD Aviation Unit helicopter encountered a pair of “drones” while conducting regular aerial patrol operations near the George Washington Bridge (GWB).  According to the NYPD pilots report they were forced to make an evasive maneuver to avoid the small unmanned crafts.  The NYPD helicopter crew was able to provide Patrol Officers on the ground as to where the devices had landed.  Two men were arrested here in Inwood on the uppermost tip of Manhattan after they were discovered with the pilotless aircrafts and radio control devices in their possession.

AGAIN

Time and again we have here reported on security breaches occurring at high-value terrorist targets in New York City and beyond. Just as such lapses in security procedures and policies have been duly noted by the appropriate authorities, there should be no doubt that these  events have been as scrutinized by those bent on bringing asymmetrical terrorist tactics to their war against the United States itself and our overseas interests. 

Just days before this early morning drone incident near the GBW, new heightened security measures had been announced.  Intelligence officials here and abroad were cautioning that bombs undetectable by current technology and screening practices may be concealed in small digital devices including laptops, tablets and cell phones.  Our adversaries in this fight against terrorist have proven their abilities to adapt and be nimble enough to counter some of  our most sophisticated technology, armament, and tactics.  Terrorists have been honing their ruthlessly brutal tactics on the killing fields of Afghanistan and Iraq and many have become particularly adept in constructing Improvised Explosive Devices (IED’s) and in urban warfare.  As their sphere of influence has broadened significantly since September 11, 2001 there has been an alarming proliferation of terrorist groups and alliances and none of them have trouble recruiting new members.  In a perverse twist the Laws of Unintended Consequences has seen the ranks of terrorist groups swell even as our high powered military engaged them in fierce, unforgiving guerilla warfare that required some serious realignment of our military’s doctrine over the course of our protracted engagements in Afghanistan and Iraq. 

ONE TRUE STRATEGY

We have also widely reported on the importance and value of the lowest common denominator, that being vigilance.  Constant rigorous vigilance enlists virtually every citizen to be on the alert when something or someone looks “out of place” near our jobs sites, during our daily commutes and in proximity to the locations we are most intimately familiar with such as our blocks and neighborhoods.   NYPD’s “See Something, Say Something” campaign has proven effective and people riding the MTA buses and subways are much more likely to report an unattended item such as a case, knapsack or shopping bag than they were prior to the rollout of this campaign in 2011. 

FROM A HOBBY TO A WEAPON OF WAR

Flying small radio controlled aircraft has long been a staple of the hobbyist community.  With the advent of smaller, lighter electronics and more sophisticated high resolution digital cameras, radio controlled aircrafts are being flown by a greater number of people than ever before.  In a real sense the pilotless aircraft currently employed by the United States Military and Intelligence communities known as drones, are products of the evolutionary process of pilotless flight. They are the next leap forward in technology and the use of highly advanced air power during military engagements. This generation of drones can be outfitted with a wide range of armament and surveillance platforms.  The military drones can fire rockets and missiles, can fly and hover at impressive altitudes while providing “real time” actual intelligence.  More controversially, the use of drones is not always as precise as it is touted to be.  Drones deployed over combat areas remove the pilot from harm’s way and there have been reported instances when drone attacks have been widely off target and, in reports, claim to have been responsible for the loss of innocent civilians.  In many ways the sophistication of the drones and their weaponry as well as having the “pilot” safely ensconced at a computer station half a world away, have seen the overall incidents of “collateral damage” drastically decreased when compared to conventional air tactics.

RADIO CONTROLLED CONCERNS

There have been several reported security breaches at the three major New York City Metropolitan Area airports since 9/11/01.  Investigative reporters have been able to gain entry to the fuel storage area at JKF approaching the airport via a small watercraft.  Others have gone unchallenged as they sought and gained entry into restricted areas at Newark Liberty Airport in New Jersey.  The most valuable and dangerous airspace for any aircraft  is in the “transition zones” from approximately 2,500 feet above the tarmac when the planes are approaching to land or gearing up for takeoff.  With the volume of air traffic in the NYC Metro airspace, a radio controlled aircraft, even if unequipped with any explosive device could still cause havoc.  A large flock of seagulls brought down US Airways Flight 1549 on January 15, 2009 forcing veteran Pilot Sully Sullenberger to make an emergency landing of the Airbus A320-200 in the middle of the Hudson River.  A single radio controlled craft could be deliberately aimed at an engine during takeoff or landing potentially resulting in mass casualties and fatalities.  We have even seen the airspace over the White House and central area of Washington, DC compromised on several occasions in the last decade.  These incidences expose faults and flaws to our national security and have certainly not gone unnoticed by our adversaries. Given the magnitude of the ineptitude of the Federal Aviation Administration (F.A.A.), and North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) on the morning of September 11, 2001, one would think that the airspace over such vital locations would be far more robust and responsive than it has been at times recently.

As radio control flight enthusiasts defend their activities as a simple hobby, akin to flying a kite, others beg to differ.  Typically, radio controlled aircraft had a top ceiling between 250 and 300 feet.  Now there are models constructed of alloys, carbon-fiber and PCV that are capable of attaining altitudes over 5000 feet. Some of the more advanced and dedicated enthusiasts report their crafts reaching altitudes above 10,000 feet. Granted, the overwhelming majority of radio control flight operators are in fact just hobbyists using this latest generation of materials and electronics for benign purposes.  But an event such as that which occurred at low altitude in close proximity to one of New York City’s most iconic bridges could inspire more malevolent types to undertake different kind of “missions”.

Since the attacks on 9/11/01 were airborne with fully fuelled passenger jets used as guided missiles one would think that the NYC Metro airports would be the most cognizant of the security of the airspace they control.  True, a small radio controlled device that that used yesterday is too small and typically flies far too low to have a radar “signature”, it is disconcerting to imagine the possibilities that commercial jets may encounter at low altitude on the final approach or on the liftoff.  These two phases are the most vulnerable for any aircraft but one need spend too much energy realizing what a bomb or explosive-laden radio controlled craft could do to such a low flying large aircraft.

IRONY

This morning’s edition of the New York Daily News on-line featured a long piece titled, “Beyond the Smoking Guns: Inside NYPD’s 21st Century Arsenal”,  detailing some of the ultrahigh tech hardware and software currently in use by the NYPD assisting in their historical mission as the City’s Law Enforcement Agency and in its far more shadowy mission regarding Anti - and Counter Terrorism as well as in Intelligence.  NYPD’s efforts and innovation now serve as models for cities around the world.  Everything from top shelf surveillance cameras, facial recognition software, advanced ballistics and other innovative technologies some that were developed under former NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly who early on identified our City’s needs as far as Intelligence gathering, analysis and threat assessments are concerned. 

While NYC, all our waterways, bridges, transportation networks, infrastructure and harbors are under the jurisdiction of NYPD, the United States Coast Guard, the Port Authority of NY/NJ, and MTA Police work in cooperation with each other in an array of unified operations that provide the level of safety and security our City demands and circumstances dictate.  That is why it is so ironic that two men from Inwood were able to navigate their radio controlled airplanes so close to the GWB and NYPD Aviation Unit’s copter.  An historical hallmark of terrorists tactically is the use of sometimes simple, crude almost primitive devices. Those who manufacture IED’s and bombs have gotten increasingly more capable over the last 12 years.  The complexity, efficacy and lethality of the bomb making skills of the insurgency in Iraq increased over the years we were engaged there and much of that bomb making knowledge and technical acumen has been shared between different terrorist factions throughout the world.  Iraq provided a convenient proving ground for IED manufacturers.  Terrorists intent to do us harm continue to refine their devices to better conceal them and construct them with elements that standard screening technology and processes at airports are unable to detect. 

UNDERESTIMATING AT OUR PERIL

We have learned a great deal about our threats over the last 13 years but all of that learning has been reactive.  Our Military, Intelligence, Counter Terrorism and Law Enforcement communities have each had to “adapt on the fly” as one retired Department of Defense Intelligence analyst recently noted.  “They (terrorists) are always forward thinking, always looking for new ways to create the type of destruction and havoc they seek”, he continued.  His sentiments have been echoed by others in the corridors of power in the CIA, DOD, FBI as well as in many foreign countries intelligence services including Interpol and Scotland Yard, that partner with us in our broader national security efforts.  Still, despite all our combined resources and efforts terrorists will always have something of an advantage.  As it has been said since the earliest days of our “War on Terror”, the terrorists only need to be right one time; we, on the other hand, have to be right 100% of the time.  It is such a lopsided equation that it has steered some to promote policies and procedures that take the path of least resistance.  A new measure of “stovepipe thinking”, that narrow focus that came to light after 9/11/01 when we were made aware of the inertia, ineptitude, and inefficiency among our sprawling federal intelligence  apparatus seems to be creeping in to some areas of the vast bureaucracy.  Such return to the pre – 9/11 mindset should not be tolerated and it ought to be countered at every turn.  

While we here in New York City can remain confident that NYPD Commissioner Bill Bratton and his Deputy Commissioner of Intelligence John Miller have largely left the outstanding handiwork of former Commissioner Ray Kelly’s Intelligence and Counter Terrorism Divisions intact, we are ever mindful of what our City represents to terrorists.  Conducting another successful attack in NYC is their Holy Grail; their ultimate goal, their preeminent target.






















 Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2014 © All Rights Reserved



Thursday, June 26, 2014

BRATTON FINDS HIS FOOTING



THE NEW “OLD” BRATTON :
SIGNIFICANT INITIATIVES COMING TO NYPD
William J. Bratton has made a name for himself
 based largely on a “broken windows” theory of policing.
(Credit Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times)



TAGS: NYPD COMMISSIONER BILL BRATTON,

NEW INITIATIVES FOR BRATTON’S NYPD,

USING OLDER “PROVEN” METHODS IN SECOND TENURE IN 1PP,

BRATTON’S SIGNATURE METHODOLOGY,

SALUTE TO BRATTON ON LATEST ANNOUNCEMENTS


(Thursday, June 26, 2014 University Heights, The Bronx, NYC)  Welcome back Bill.  After six months in his second tenure as the NYPD Commissioner the Bill Bratton we knew and respected back in the early 1990’s is once again asserting himself in old familiar ways and we applaud the return of this Bill Bratton. All New Yorkers of a certain age can vividly recall the “bad old days” when New York City ranked at the top of all major crime categories and the City itself seemed at times to be tenuously balanced on life support as the NYPD fought crime tooth and nail in some of the most crime ridden Precincts in the nation.  As our City sank ever deeper into the scalding molten lava of crime, low quality of life, wide spread crime in our subways and on our streets during the disastrous years of the hapless administration of David Dinkens, the arrival of Rudy Giuliani into City Hall as our Mayor was welcomed by all.  Giuliani, a tough former Federal Prosecutor for the Southern District of New York was a well-known and highly regarded crime fighter that a beleaguered population looked to for solutions despite his political affiliation as a Republican in one of, if not the most Democratic cities in America.  Giuliani tapped one-time Chief of the NYC Transit Police, a native Bostonian highly regarded in Law Enforcement circles, Bill Bratton to serve as his NYPD Commissioner.  The rest of that chapter in the storied past of NYC and the NYPD is, as they say, history.

A MORE FAMILIAR BILL

After getting off to somewhat of a rocky start in his second term as NYPD Commissioner, Bill Bratton seems to have found his sea legs.  Some of his earliest restructuring of the top cops in One Police Plaza, alterations of patrol tactics and anti-crime strategies, as well as a handful of profound shifts in the Intelligence and Counter Terrorism Divisions, the “old” Bill Bratton is once again seeking novel approaches to policing the City that has changed and been changed so much since his last go round in the first Giuliani administration.  It was during that tenure that Bratton, an innovative flamboyant Cop, Jack Maple who designed the technological template for what became CompStat, implemented a variety of measures that ultimately resulted in the most amazing turn around and elevated the City of New York to the literal “safest big City” in the United States.  That Bratton has returned to a City that he had an integral role in making safer in his first term in 1PP cannot be denied.  The initiatives put in place in the post 9/11 years under Mayor Bloomberg and Commissioner Ray Kelly have proven to be successful in the constant overcast of another terrorist attack.

As the initial shock of September 11th, 2001 began to fade some of the initiatives Ray Kelly implemented in both the Intelligence and Counter Terrorism Divisions, as well as a sound patrol practice known as “Stop, Question and Frisk” (SQF) became controversial.  The “See Something, Say Something” campaign enlisted all New Yorkers  to be constantly vigilant of any suspicious activity such as unattended packages or backpacks left on subway trains, and it paid off.  Some have questioned the legality of the means to the ends in this equation as well as the right to privacy and freedom of religion citing the enhanced monitoring of New York City’s large Muslim community as “racial targeting”.  Such knee-jerk reactions are typical here in this bastion of Liberal Democrats however every step Kelly implemented in his Department was upheld in the Courts despite repeated attempts to have NYPD’s operations curtailed.  The activists’ version of an effective policy dropped the “question” element from the equation as it became derisively known as simply “Stop and Frisk”.  It was in this legal battle as well as the enhanced surveillance in Muslim neighborhoods coffee shops and Mosques that forced Bloomberg and Kelly to scale down their efforts.  Yet, it cannot be dismissed that the NYPD thwarted, averted or prevented (some would add "allegedly") 13 terrorist plots.  That NYC has not seen another terrorist atrocity since 9/11 is an undeniable fact and arguably should be credited to Kelly and his Department.

When our current Mayor Bill de Blasio was a candidate he ran on a strong anti-Stop, Questions and Frisk platform, called for an end to what he viewed as “racial profiling” by the NYPD and vowed to “reform” the NYPD with measures that included the installation of an Inspector General, Philip Eure, as the supreme “watchdog” over NYPD.  Eure’s purview remains ill-defined given the already existing Civilian Review Board that has been in operation for many years. During the earliest days of the de Blasio/Bratton tag team it appeared that Bratton was prepared to be more of a contrite penitent seeking the approval of all the varied “disenfranchised” communities within our Five Boroughs.  After all, candidate de Blasio was never shy in his criticism of the NYPD, Ray Kelly, Mayor Bloomberg and any and all of their policing initiatives.  When the candidate became our Mayor and appointed Bratton as his Top Cop many rank and file Member of Service (MOS) of the NYPD were uncertain of what, if any changes Bratton would enact.  Others among the ranks had only been newborns during Bratton’s first stint in 1PP. 

SURVEILLANCE CITY: EYES IN THE SKIES

Since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack there has been a dramatic increase in the number of surveillance cameras operated by the NYPD, private security firms, local shops and other public places.  While the exact number will not be released by the NYPD, personnel in the Intel Division unofficially claim that they operate upwards of 22,000 closed circuit monitoring cameras including at least half that number having long term recording capabilities.  As any New Yorker knows all those tinted dome affixed to street corners, building lobbies and exteriors as well as the portable NYPD surveillance towers are keeping a watchful eye on us all.  In recent years in NYC and other locations across the country closed circuit cameras have contributed mightily in the identification and arrests of criminals of every ilk.  Yes, there are privacy issues and it will always be a hotly debated topic among civil libertarians and public advocacy groups and Law Enforcement.  Certainly it is a valid debate but in the world of asymmetrical warfare and non-state sponsored terrorism, it could reasonably be posited that the security of the “great good” can trump the absolute privacy of people in public domains.  In this age of exploitive, narcissistic “social media” where people willingly, if not wantonly reveal themselves in a cyber/viral manner, there seems to be a cognitive dissonance when it comes to individual privacy. That the very same technology we use privately can also be utilized for public safety should not be as controversial as it often is.

EYES UNDERGOUND

Yesterday Commissioner Bratton announced his plans to have surveillance cameras installed in all subway stations and subway cars.  That he man who first employed some high-tech algorithms and innovations back in the 1990’s would seek novel approaches in an effort to keep the crime rates decreasing only seems logical.  His idea is to enable the NYPD to do “more with less”, to utilize the available technology in the on-going fight against crime throughout our vast, largely subterranean rail transportation system.

If all the subway track in the service of the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) was laid out end to end it would reach from Times Square to Detroit, a distance of approximately 829 miles.  That’s a lot of track and the subway system has an average weekday ridership of 5.5 million commuters.  There are 484 subway stations in the complex City-wide network that presents, and always has, a host of challenges for the NYPD to effectively monitor and police.
Bratton envisions an underground surveillance array of cameras that will be monitored by Cops armed with tablet computers and other hi-tech, hand held devices.  This would represent the latest innovative method of “smart policing”; of doing more actual crime intervention with fewer Cops assigned to a designated locale.  Such an MTA-wide network of cameras and communications technology could and would prove its value and financial “return on investment” in a very brief time as one NYPD Three Star Chief commented in a phone conversation earlier today.  He spoke under the condition of anonymity because he is not officially authorized to speak to the media on behalf of the NYPD. 

TWEAKING COMPSTAT

Another of Commissioner Bratton’s announcements yesterday was directly related to the as yet to be determined relationship between the decrease in Stop, Question and Frisk usage and the uptick in crime, particularly gun violence in some off the highest crime Precincts in the City.  Here, at the 46th Precinct in the University Heights neighborhood of The Bronx there has been a troubling increase in violent crime since the orders from 1PP to reduce the frequency of SQF.  Returning to his penchant for statistically derived patterns and trends, Bratton has ordered a review focusing in the seven other Precincts besides the 46th that are experiencing the most disturbing increases in gun crime after reductions in SQF.  As a “numbers guy” and a stickler for accountability among the ranks he commands, it is only natural that he would revitalize some of the methods that had yielded some much of the NYPD’s success during his initial tenure as Commissioner. He has announced some plans to revamp deployment of his Officers as determined by CompStat and seasonal specifics such as increasing the police presence in Coney Island as the summer beach and boardwalk activity heats up. We view these as more proactive, practical applications of a Police Department that must always be dynamic due to the nature of our City both as the home to almost 9 million residents and a world renowned, international capitol.   

WE STAND CORRECTED

As even the most casual reader of the Brooding Cynyx knows, we have been highly critical of the second incarnation of Bill Bratton.  We had been very skeptical regarding the return of Bratton and never missed an opportunity to make our opinions known.  We have received a great deal of criticism for our negative stance on Bratton Version 2.0 and have respected all opinions voiced including those most critical of our own opinion.  While much remains to be seen in the not too distant future we have begun to turn the objective corner on our assessment of the return of Bill Bratton.

It is encouraging to watch as Bratton settles more comfortably into his Office and begins to assert himself and emerge from beneath the shadow of the Mayor who chose him specifically to perform an extremely challenging job.  Without doubt there will be troubles along the way; as we all realize here in Gotham City anything can happen in the blink of an eye.  We live and move at a pace that can only ever be natural for the native born.  We’re tough and resilient, we don’t suffer fools easily, we can be aggressive and abrasive to the outside world but among our diverse and disparate selves we are one, we all share this 326 square miles with each other and are the only people on the planet who can proudly claim the title of  "New Yorker". 

Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2014 © All Rights Reserved




















Friday, December 27, 2013

LONGTIME BRATTON ALLY RETURNING TO NYPD



MILLER MAKING FAMILIAR LEAP
This April 18, 2012, file photo, released by CBS shows John Miller on the set of "CBS This Morning," in New York. CBS News correspondent Miller has bounced between journalism and law enforcement for many years. Now he's jumping back to work for incoming New York City Police Commissioner William Bratton. CBS confirmed Miller's exit on Thursday, Dec. 26, 2013. Miller worked under Bratton when the incoming commissioner led the New York and Los Angeles police departments in the past.
CBS, HEATHER WINES, FILE — AP Photo

TAGS: NYPD, NYPD COMMISSIONER BILL BRATTON, LAPD, JOHN MILLER

JOURNALIST & CLOSE FRIEND OF BRATTON BACK TO NYPD, TRANSITION FROM KELLY

TO BRATTON, VULNERABILITY DURING TRANSITION, NYPD INTELLIGENCE DIVISION,

 NYPD COUNTER TERRORISM UNIT, IMPORTANCE OF CONTINUITY OF COMMAND,

Al QAEDA, 9-11-2001, SECURING OUR CITY





(Friday December 27, 2013, UES, NYC)  John Miller announced yesterday that he will be resigning from his job with CBS News to take a position as yet to be named, on Bill Bratton’s staff. There have been some rumors floated that Miller will have a position with the NYPD Counter Terrorism Unit although no one in a position to know is willing to confirm or deny these reports.  This is not the first time the former beat reporter for WNBC and ABC has left a position in journalism to follow his friend Bill Bratton. 

Miller became somewhat famous while working for the WNBC local newscast in New York City.  In the 1980’s he became easily recognizable to New Yorker’s due to his extensive coverage and oddly cordial on-air relationship with former Mafia Don, John Gotti.  During each of Gotti’s trials Miller enjoyed almost exclusive access to the “Teflon Don”, a moniker that Miller helped to promote.  There were many who credited Miller’s nonstop obsession with Gotti for helping Gotti, himself, a convicted killer, to become a household name throughout the New York City Metropolitan Area.  Miller used his access to Gotti to help the mobster to wear the persona of a local hero in some parts of the City, particularly in Little Italy and Brooklyn.  During those years however, many in the NYPD Organized Crime Task Force began viewing Miller as a shill for one of the most notoriously violent, ruthless, coldblooded Dons of La Cosa Nostra in the long and storied annals of Italian organized crime in NYC.

Miller enjoyed his notoriety and was often found late at night in some of the swankiest watering holes and restaurants of the Upper East Side.  When Mayor Rudy Giuliani appointed Bill Bratton as his Police Commissioner, Bratton tapped Miller to fill the post of NYPD Public Information Officer which was quickly re-designated as Deputy Commissioner for Public Information.  Bratton and Miller had become fast friends when Bratton was the Chief of the NYPD Transit Division a few years before becoming Commissioner for the first time.  Both men enjoyed the fine wining and dining they saw as the well-deserved “perks” of their jobs in One Police Plaza. In those days it was not uncommon to see Miller belligerently intoxicated, rude and boisterous waving around his Deputy Commissioner’s “Gold Shield” which is a grievous insult to members of NYPD and embarrassing for all to see.   As it turned out, Mayor Giuliani came to feel overshadowed by his Commissioner and asked for Bratton’s resignation.  Miller returned to his career as a journalist and his most famous coup was a sit down face to face interview (Link below) in 1998 with a lanky, soft spoken bearded Saudi millionaire living in caves and Bedouin-type tents in the rugged mountains of Afghanistan.  In that interview Osama bin Laden announced to the world his evil intentions but no one in our government took him seriously. In a few short years we would all bear witness to bin Laden’s commitment and handiwork.

JOINED AT THE HIP

While Bratton was making a very substantial living in the private sector as a consultant, Miller once again returned to TV journalism. In 2002 the newly elected Mayor of Los Angeles, James Hahn appointed Bratton as the Chief of Police of the perpetually troubled LAPD. Bratton named Miller as LAPD's chief of counterterrorism and criminal intelligence despite the fact that Miller was woefully unqualified for that position. Bratton’s tenure consisted of two five year terms that were viewed positively as his methods and tactics, the same he implemented under Giuliani in New York, did in fact reduce crime and reform much of the LAPD.  There is little known about Miller’s performance in Los Angeles aside from the fact that his ego and abrasive manner often found him alienated from the rank and file of LAPD and some members of the local press corps. 

When Bratton was denied the opportunity for a third term as LAPD Chief he once again found himself in a lucrative position working as a security consultant and keynote speaker on the circuit.  The former Boston street cop was travelling the world over and apparently enjoying the rewards of his years of public service. After Bratton’s departure from LA, Miller was appointed as Associate Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Analytic Transformation and Technology.  Prior to that, he was an Assistant Director of Public Affairs for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), where he was the bureau's national spokesman. Once again there is little known about his on the job performance in these postings but many former employees felt he got his high ranking positions via “personal and professional connections” and that “good people were passed over” to fill those jobs.

Once Bill de Blasio won the Mayoralty here last month it was just a matter of weeks before de Blasio named Bratton as the new Commissioner of the NYPD.  For many long time high ranking NYPD veterans, members of the “Upper Brass” and other observers, it was believed the appointment of Bratton was inevitability and would allow Miller to ride Bratton’s coattails back into a position of prominence in NYPD.  For the better part of the last 20 years, for the most part, where ever Bratton has gone Miller has followed.

As was reported here and elsewhere on December 19 two of Ray Kelly’s top staffers, Deputy Commissioner for Counterterrorism Richard Daddario, and Deputy Commissioner of Intelligence David Cohen were resigning effect immediately after Bill de Blasio is sworn in to Office.  The contributions these two men made to our City cannot be measured or quantified; they created the most effective and efficient municipal urban Intelligence Division and Counter Terrorism Units in the country if not the world.  Their absence will leave gapping voids in two of the most important Commands in NYPD in our post 9 – 11 world.  The notion that John Miller may be named as a replacement for one of these men is, as a Counter Terrorism Detective commented, “Absolutely ludicrous and, if it happens, it will be a huge, very large blunder on Bratton’s part.  I mean, these Units did not even exist as they are now when Bratton was here in 1996.  He has some very big shoes to fill and needs to fill all the vacancies that resignations and retirement are causing”.

The real issue at hand is not Bratton’s qualifications to lead NYPD but rather if he will have the same priorities that Kelly honored.  Certainly he will be quickly at odds with Mayor de Blasio given the fact that much of de Blasio’s campaign rhetoric and “promises” to the “minority” communities are diametrically opposite of Bratton’s philosophy, strategy and tactics he has employed in the past.  It is doubtful Bratton will morph into a “kinder, gentler” Commissioner just because de Blasio has repeatedly stated his intention to reform NYPD and broaden the scope of the Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB), revamp the “Stop, Question and Frisk” policy that has engendered so much animosity towards NYPD from factions of the African American and Latino population and otherwise make changes that will no doubt, if enacted, drastically alter the operations of NYPD as a whole and some of the most specialized Divisions and Units specifically.  Our city can ill afford a prolonged transitionary period from the Kelly era to the new Bratton regime.  Only time will tell if de Blasio made the proper choice with Bratton and if Bratton’s friend and ally, John Miller, is really up to the task.  Hopefully we’ll not learn the hard way.











(YouTube video of John Miller’s 1998 interview with Osama bin Laden link below)


Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2013 © All Rights Reserved