Wednesday, April 22, 2009

FIRST DOG BO NAMES PERSONAL STAFF

SETS AMBITIOUS CANINE ISSUE ORIENTED AGENDA


Bo Obama







Bo Jackson and Bo Derek :
newest White House staffers.


(April 22, Washington, DC) After recently being appointed “First Dog”, Bo, the Portuguese Water Dog has announced the members of his personal staff. According to Bo, “ The Obama’s have been exceptionally good to me. I m very honored they have made me first dog. However, the girls are in school, Michelle is out and President Obama is busy. I do not mean to be politically incorrect but I do have to shit and piss on a fairly regular basis.”

Given the fact that Bo has certain personal,biological and psychological needs, it has become visually apparent that Bo needs a staff of his own. In that regard Bo has named the famous athlete, Bo Jackson, and the famous pinup, Bo Derek, as his personal staff.

“Bo Jackson, one of the greatest athletes of the last century will teach me how to fetch, catch a Frisbee and chase after a football.” The First Dog, without a leash, speaking to the press corps continued, “ Bo Derek will instruct me how to run on sand and in the surf as well as do creative things with my hair. Besides that, I’d hump her leg as if I’d die in the morning.”

While many former Presidents had pets in the White House, Bo is the first to have his own office in the West Wing as well as being the first to select his own staff. White House Chief of Staff, Rahm Emmanuel commented, “The President thought Bo should play a bigger role than other First Dogs. He’s encouraging Bo to set his own agenda, to choose a few issues that are important to him and to take advantage of his position as the most powerful canine in the world.”

Michelle Obama, the First Lady, expressed mixed emotions about Bo’s staff but also pointed out some of the advantages. “Sasha and Malia are already tired of taking him for walks. If we just let him out to run around the grounds there is always the danger the Secret Service might shoot him. We have had a stray cat or two wander onto the White House grounds and the Secret Service shot them with shoulder fired missiles. This can be a difficult environment for an animal. Bo definitely needs companionship. Bo Jackson will help our Bo develop his doggie skills under his watchful eye and Bo Derek, well, as long as she wears clothes, I’m sure she can help Bo in other ways. She has already caused a stir among the male heterosexual White House staffers. Some of the female employees are equally excited.”

President Obama expressed optimism regarding the potential utility Bo can have in his Administration. The President commented, “While we first got Bo to satisfy the girls, it has quickly become apparent that Bo has a great deal to offer my Administration. he has already proven more valuable than Joe Biden and says a lot less. Bo can be a good will ambassador traveling the world bringing much needed attention to the plight of domesticated dogs as well as other animals. I think his first 100 days in the White House will tell us a good deal about him.”

While most White House staffers and visitors find Bo a charming addition to the Administration, there have already been several awkward moments. White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs noted, “Dogs are good readers of people, of their character, they have good sense. Bo has already proven his people reading skills but a few times his reactions were, a little course. He pissed all over Nancy Pelosi’s Italian shoes, took a huge dump in Mitch McConnell’s lap, spit up on Eric Cantor and bit John Boehner several times on the hand and groin. That says alot as far as we’re concerned. We are also excited about having him travel abroad in the future.”

Bo Jackson has thus far established the closest relationship with the First Dog. Speaking to reporters, Mr. Jackson offered some insight regarding some of the issues Bo has already placed on his agenda. “Bo will fight “pooper-scooper” laws across the country and will advocate for better fire hydrant placement particularly in the inner cities. He is against all “leash required” laws in public spaces and will fight vigorously against the barbaric practice of having pets neutered or spayed. He also believes that dogs and cats should be permitted to fly in the passenger coach with their owners instead of in a tight, cramped boxes in the cargo hold. All I can say is watch out, this Bo ain’t no average dog.”


Copyright TBC 2009 © All Rights Reserved

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

TEA BAGS, DOUCHE BAGS, WIND BAGS & SCUM BAGS

TAX RETURNS FILED BY TODAY ARE FOR INCOME EARNED
IN 2008. WHOSE TAX CODE ARE THEY PROTESTING?











(April 15, Boston, Mass) The utterly ridiculous and absurd are now replacing reality and substance. At least for the “silent majority”, whoever they are.

From coast to coast today right wing conservatives of every stripe joined with anti-Obama, anti-taxation, antigovernment, anti-everything and anything that hints at our government functioning for the greater good, held protests to basically hold protests. Using the Boston Tea Party motif, these activists turned out in numbers well below what the right wing pundits who organized this charade expected. In some locations the turnouts were so pathetically low they were hardly noticed. In some places the planned protests did not even materialize. Wonder why?

The shear lunacy of this wholly fabricated non event defies the facts and plain truths of the issues these bozos claim to be riled up about. Every tax return that was required to be filed by today was for income earned in 2008. This “silent majority” may be comprised of the majority of Americans with short term memory deficits, those comatose for the past eight years and the simply simple who feed their paranoid hungers with the drivel spouted by the Rush Limbaugh’s and Bill O’Reilly’s of the media entertainment world.

The problems these imbeciles are taking to the streets over, encouraging a “mass” revolt against “the system” , all have their genesis during the Bush years. They seem to be unable, unwilling or incapable of acknowledging that George W. Bush, the worst president in our history, presided over the single largest expansion of the federal government since the New Deal, as well as the record deficit spending that has helped clog our economic arteries.

Apparently all these “fed up” regular folks believe that all their problems and the problems plaguing our country today began on January 21, 2009 with the inauguration of President Barak Obama. The absurdity of their complaints implies an unprecedented collective idiocy that is all the more amazing in its blatant deceptiveness. There stances on the various issues are simply not based on reality.

These protesters are so devoid of the ability to consider any issue objectively that they allow themselves to be manipulated by media blowhards far removed from the lives of the “regular working people” they claim to represent.


The Republican Party is experiencing mass seizures and shivers suggestive of the death throes. Their ass beating last November has obviously induced a viral type of frustration and anger that would be laughable if not for the ‘just below the surface’ element of gross irresponsibility it represents.

Not too much should be read into this “movement”. Today’s cockamamie “protests” are more of a collective right wing bowel movement then any real grassroots activism. For there to be a “loyal opposition” there must be two well defined, clearly articulated competing philosophies of policy and practicality. All the right wing and the GOP offers is shallow bullshit draped in pseudo-patriotism, misguided, often self righteous anger admixed with a strain of real hatred. This particular mixture got them pretty far last November didn’t it?

Talk radio galoots and ignorant pundits will not foment a mass upheaval no matter what they think or intend. Their hyperbolic tripe will not inspire their audiences to anything more than half-assed, bogus “protests” where the question of what precisely is being protested can barely be answered or ascertained.

While the “silent majority” where polishing their pictures of Ronald Reagan, oiling their shotguns, praying for the end of abortion, evolution, and modern science, the waves of “Middle of the Road” independents, “The Voting Majority”, passed them by. Actually, they trounced over them and their tired rhetoric, disproven theories and neo-conservative zealotry. They can call the results of last November’s elections populism or socialism; their juvenile, narrow minded labels are as meaningless as are their current grievances.

Oddly, this slender segment of society has only themselves and their arrogant republican politicians to blame. The GOP was hijacked years ago by hardcore right wingers largely obstinate just for the sake of being so. They constructed “movements” based on “social issues” that did not age well with the majority of voters who now identify as “independents.” People of good conscience, common sense and practical reasonableness fled from the ever shrinking tent of the GOP, ran from those self appointed leaders of that “movement” and now find themselves in the true, quantifiable, majority that swept president Obama and Democrats into office as the back draft of the horrible Bush administration was heading south.

Perhaps some good will come of today’s spectacle of cheap, political theater. Possible some of these people and others not as far out on the right as these clowns, will come ot realize they have been poorly served by their elected leaders, talk radio / cable TV heroes and their “core issues”. The country has passed them by. The scale and scope of our troubles are far too vast for petty partisan petulance. The GOP lost the election resoundingly and they should either participate in identifying solutions or simply get out of the way. If all they can do is support the freak shows conducted today, they will exiled further into the political wilderness as others more responsible, rationale and reasonable seek to govern. We need such people now more than ever. There is no longer any time or patience for the loudmouthed tactics of the right. All the gas bags, windbags, douche bags and scum bags should stuff their mouths with their tea bags and head on home.


http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/wilayto150409.html

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/04/tax-day-obama-v-republican-tea-party-revolt.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mitchell-bard/the-teabag-protests-smack_b_187327.html


Copyright TBC 2009 © All Rights Reserved

Monday, April 13, 2009

ASYMMETRY ON THE HIGH SEAS

US NAVY SEALS THE DEAL



The USS Bainbridge is named after Commodore William Bainbridge, a famous
19th century US Naval Officer who fought pirates in the same waters
Captain Phillips’ was captured.


(April 13, Norfolk, VA) With three Navy Seal executed accurate shots from the stern of the USS Bainbridge, the first US mariner held for ransom by Somali pirates was freed on Sunday. The permission to use deadly force was issued by President Obama from the White House late Saturday. One of the four pirates is in custody of the Navy while the hostage, Captain Richard Phillips, is en route home. Phillips’ captivity began after a failed hijacking by Somali pirates on April 7. He is reported to be unharmed and in good physical condition.

In recent years pirates, primarily based out of Somalia on the western horn of Africa, at the mouth of vitally important Gulf of Aden, have seized over 60 ships and held the ships and crews as hostages. Virtually all of the hijackings were resolved after the ships owners decided to pay ransom. An estimated $80 million has been paid to pirates over the past 7 years. The American freighter, Maersk Alabama, was the first US flagged ship to fall victim to the increasingly brazen west African pirates.

The Gulf of Aden is extremely important to international maritime shipping. Virtually all of the crude oil and petroleum products exported by Saudi Arabia must transit through the Gulf. Keeping the vital waterway and immediately adjacent shipping lanes secure has become of prime importance in recent years as pirate activity has grown. Currently an international armada and a NATO led group patrol the vast area. Despite the enhanced international naval presence the pirates appear to be able to hijack with impunity. Just since Captain Phillips rescue, three ships have been seized.

Some of the first photographic images of the Maersk Alabama incident showed three US Navy warships surrounding a 26 foot life boat containing the four pirates and Phillips. The contrasts in capabilities were stark and just another illustration of the asymmetrical engagements the United States will confront in the years to come.

Since September 11, 2001, we have seen the challenges of confronting asymmetrical actors. A small band of radical terrorists were able to launch the dramatic attacks on US soil in 2001. Based out of a lawless region of Afghanistan they were able to prepare, plan and plot in isolation. As “non state actors” retaliation becomes a thorny issue for several reasons not the least of which is the difficulty locating terrorists when they reside in “safe havens” within sovereign nations.

Somali pirates are prime examples of such “non state actors” operating from a lawless country which is basically an ungoverned, failed state. To launch military strikes against their shore bases raises a variety of questions regarding the nature of the action, the rules of engagement and international law.

Piracy, over the centuries, has always been considered a crime on the high seas punishable under the auspices of well defined, internationally recognized, maritime law. During the 17th and 18th centuries justice was usually swift and deadly. When US Navy Seals fatally wounded three of the four Somali pirates, they were acting within long held, established tradition regarding piracy. The questions are now how to prevent or at least minimize the occurrence of this high seas crime.

Some of the questions now being discussed at the highest levels of our government have actually been answered already. There is no and never has been any ambiguity for how to bring pirates to justice. As mentioned previously, putting the current rash of pirate hijackings and kidnappings in historic context, the methods and legal justifications for dealing with them is well known. Piracy has never been tolerated and it should not now. The fact that shippers have chosen to negotiate and subsequesntly pay ransom for their ships and crews has established a very dangerous precedent. As proven on Easter Sunday, the United States will not negotiate with pirates; the only payment they will receive from America will come in the form of deadly force.

Piracy is not terrorism although the two are cousins of a similar mindset often with similar motives, aims and rationales. In some ways piracy can be seen as terrorism if it presents a national security threat. If interruptions in commercial maritime activities such as the timely delivery of crude oil escalates to the point it creates shortages, then it can be considered terroristic. One concern is that we are seeing how difficult it is to “bring terrorists to justice.”

With piracy there is no need to get bogged down in troubling issues of precisely how to prosecute them as terrorists. Pirates should be prosecuted according to the established laws of the high seas which includes the use of lethal force on the scene and the death penalty from a maritime court or other state sanctioned court after apprehension. Some are already arguing if pirates should be tried in US criminal courts. Provided the well defined body of piracy law is enforced, in whatever venue they may find themselves legally, they should be dealt with swiftly and accordingly: there is no legal defense for piracy, plain and simple. The United States must muster the fortitude to deal with it plainly and simply.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/12/captain-richard-phillips_n_185983.html

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,514719,00.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/14/AR2009041400836.html

http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/04/13/u.s.pirate.prosecution/

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/04/14/world/AP-Piracy.html?_r=1&hp


Copyright TBC 2009 © All Rights Reserved

Thursday, April 9, 2009

FINAL HONORS FOR PITTSBURGH OFFICERS LAID TO REST

THEY, NOT THE PERPETRATOR, ARE THE STORY







(April 9, Pittsburgh, PA) Five days after being ambushed after responding to a domestic dispute call, three slain Pittsburgh Police Officers were laid to rest earlier today. It was the second time in as many weeks that a major American city buried multiple officers who were killed in the line of duty. Three weeks ago 4 members of the Oakland (CA) PD were gunned down by a life long criminal.

The circumstances of the fatal events in oakland and Pittsburgh were very different yet they both dramatically underscored the notion that, for a Police Officer on duty, there is nothing routine in the routine. Each and every call, no matter how seemingly innocuous, may in fact unfold as a life and death scenario. Each public encounter, from a traffic stop to a distress call from a suburban home, requires vigilance in approach and tactics. Safety of the Officers and the public should always be the prevailing guideline.

Over the past few weeks we have witnessed several mass fatality shootings across the country. The day before the tragic event in pittsburgh, a Viet Namese immigrant killed 13 people in a civic center in Binghamton, NY. There were several incidents of recently laid off employees returning to their former place of employment and shooting randomly. An assisted living facility in North Carolina was the scene of a mass casualty shooting and at least three families have been murdered by the head of the household. Each of these events leaves us dismayed, confused and angered. We seem to have the need to know the motives that drove the individuals to murder; after all, some of these folks appeared almost familiar to us in a generic sort of way.

In the wake of such senseless crimes there gun control debate is sure to surface as are other corollary avenues of inquiry all of which pertain to the perpetrators. Yes, motive is important; understanding the dynamics of such actors can prove to be of value to the law enforcement community in the future. However, a greater degree of focus needs to be placed on the victims, the Police Officers who in reality do tangibly represent law and order in our communities.

The media is too eager to sensationalize the crime, psychoanalyze the perpetrator and pay brief, cursory attention to those who died in the line of duty. This is simply the way our culture is today: all about entertainment and appealing to the basest of human emotions. Soon we find days have turned into weeks of increasingly greater detailed coverage of the murderers as the Officers are laid to rest away from the media’s eye.
As facts about the two Police killers became known, portraits of two very different but equally disturbed individuals have emerged. In both cases, specifics from their pasts, certain items found in their possession or where they resided, have provided the media ample fodder for their hyperactive extrapolation machines. Jiverly Wong, the Binghamton shooter, was reportedly “upset” by many slights, real and imagined, ranging from being “made fun of “ because of his accent, to paranoid delusions that “undercover police” were stalking him. The press had a field day with these items and an even greater time reporting on an alleged “death threat” towards President Obama, Wong had reportedly made in front of coworkers. The media wasted no time exploiting some comments made by friends of Richard Poplawski, the Pittsburgh cop killer. According to some of his self-described friends, Poplawski resented President Obama for “wanting to take” away the right to bear arms, among his other alleged complaints.

So naturally, the coverage of these horrific stories had a distinctly political slant as if some political issues had actually driven these two troubled men to murder Police Officers. Some in the media took the approach that the hyperbolic rhetoric of “right wing talk radio hosts” may have been a motivating factor to Poplawski. Likewise, the immigration debate became front and center in the Binghamton tragedy simply because Wong was a naturalized immigrant. Sensationalistic, simplistic, tabloidesque writing is neither reporting or journalism. It is the lowest form of mass exploitation and dissemination of misinformation.

But, then again, who really cares? The question is, why is so much media attention given to lunatics who randomly, wantonly murder rather than the Police Officers who have given their lives while performing in the line of duty? Why does our society not collectively respect such sacrifice and celebrate such noble courage?

Until we can answer these and many other difficult questions, our society will continue to be plagued by criminal and random violence. This is not to suggest that some societal revelations will eliminate the violence in our cities and towns. Not at all. We will remain a violent society if, for no other reason, that we have always, historically, been a violent people. There are no practical solutions to mitigate the levels of violence we have come to accept as normal however, this does not rule out trying to instill a greater respect towards members of the law enforcement community within our communities.

Indeed, for every Peace Officer in the land there is no “routine” call; the dangers are ever present, insidious and very often random acts of psychotic desperation, paranoid delusions or sociopathic bloodlust. We should support and empower our Police at all times.

May we learn to show greater respect for the “Thin Blue Line” and the men and women who comprise it.

Rest in Peace, Officers Sciullo, Kelly, and Mayhle
Godspeed, Brothers.





Links:

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09100/961933-53.stm

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09100/961912-53.stm

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09095/960744-53.stm

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09098/961304-53.stm

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2009/04/04/2009-04-04_who_is_jiverly_voong_aka_jiverly_wong_co.html

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2009/04/06/2009-04-06_letter_from_jiverly_wong_the_gunman_in_t.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/08/jiverly-wong-fired-98-sho_n_184950.html

http://www.nypost.com/seven/04052009/news/nationalnews/failed_life_for_killer_coward_162952.htm


Copyright TBC 2009 © All Rights Reserved
Copyright Bronxwest Consulting 2009 © All Rights Reserved

Friday, April 3, 2009

HYPOCRITES OATH

DOCTOR, EXAMINE THYSELF



We’re only as healthy as we can afford to be.
Why?





(April 3, Rochester, MN) The raging health care debate in this country has focused primarily on the role of the insurance providers, and rightfully so. However, they are not the only culprits in the making of this quagmire. Third party payments have created the white-coated monsters we call doctors. Their greed is never mentioned in the debate and there can never be any true, practical, health care reform without a rigorous examination of the role of physicians in the creation and perpetuation of our natioanl health care nightmare.

1.

We are all learning powerful lessons about capitalism today. As our federal government doles out trillions to the private sector, particularly banks, financial institutions, and auto manufacturers, there is unprecedented focus on what form of control, if any, the federal government purchases with its “bailouts.” The inherent weaknesses of capitalism are suddenly front and center; the issues at hand cut to the very core of our economic philosophy. Free market capitalism has provided incredible wealth, success and stability since our founding. Now, however, the flaws in our system are undeniable. The financial industry has been permitted to function in the absence of real oversight and increased deregulation. The years of incestuous relations between the private sector , special interests, and Congress have been exposed to the harsh light of scrutiny. Americans are frustrated and angry by what has been revealed yet demonstrate a collective aversion (and rightfully so) to any influence or control by the federal government in the free markets. Sure, the public is dismayed by the accounts of huge executive salaries, stunned by the size of Wall Street bonuses, and angered by the notion of “golden parachutes” while they continue to tread water during this economic storm barely staying above the choppy surface.

2.

Americans have a sense of right and wrong but a seemingly limited capacity to grasp the intricacies and obtuse functions of our economic machinery. All they care about, naturally, is how they are personally affected by the forces they do not fully understand. How could they not? Their collective common sense is labeled “economic populism”. This term is tossed around by politicians and pundits for no reason other than to assign a label; the need to understand complexity by assigning simple labels to our problems allows the “sound bite” and “bumper sticker slogans” to dominate the discourse. It is as if only by “dumbing down” the particulars of any issue, concern, or crisis, that it can be presented to the masses for consumption. We all are partially to blame for this and the rancorous nature of the partisan approach to discussion and debate only perpetuates this disturbing trend.

3.

Aside from the sectors of the economy that have been garnering all the headlines and attention is the one, long standing, perhaps intractable problem; the cost of health care. Entwined in this single issue are a host of elements that transcend the economics of medicine but also speak to our society, culture and national consciousness. Because of this mutli-headed demon the primary concerns are easily obscured. They simple get overshadowed, if not lost, as the secondary elements muddy the waters of discourse. At times it is appeared that know debate was possible simply because a common definition of the precise problems could not be established. At other times special, entrenched interests have set the terms of the debate often deceptively evoking emotional responses from the general public. No other issue seems to generate the level of intensity, public interest and rancor than reforming our health care industry.

While hundreds of thousands of Americans fear foreclosure of their homes, consider bankruptcy, worry about providing for their families, their children’s education's and live with crushing debt, vanishing pensons and insecure futures, their are many who the ills of the economic recession have yet to infect. Over one million newly unemployed among us have joined the swollen ranks of the un- and underemployed in the last 15 months. Still, the majority of us remain in our jobs, some of us work two or three jobs, but largely we are employed.

4.

The one aspect of the current crisis that does touch us all is the access, affordability and coverage of our health insurance or lack thereof. Not everyone will own a home or become unemployed but everyone, at some time, does require the services of a physician. What the majority of working Americans fear most today is that some illness or injury in their family will occur and destroy them financially. According to recent polls conducted by the Harvard School of Public Medicine, the University of Minnesota, Gallup, The Brookings Institute, The Heritage Foundation, Time Magazine and USA Today, the overwhelming majority of Americans feel their health insurance, if they have it, is not adequate and a huge financial burden.

Conspicuously absent from any health care reform debate are physicians. Big pharmaceutical houses, insurance companies, HMO’s, and hospitals constitute the usual suspects. They are all complicit in our national health care crisis but there can be no denying the role that physicians have played in getting us where we are today. Why are they apparently sacrosanct? Since they play a fundamental and profound role in the health care industry, why are they “off limits” when the debates ensue?

There is plenty of blame to assign in this complex dilemma; enough culprits to vent our anger at. But the physicians themselves are as culpable in this mess as any other entity, perhaps more so than anyone has thus far been willing to admit.

5.

There was a time that physicians in private practice were paid by their patients after services were rendered. Doctors and their patients historically and until very recently enjoyed mutually respectful relationships. Doctors were always held in high regard not only for their education by for the vital roles they played in our lives. From birth through death doctors escorted us through life. many of us are old enough to have memories of childhood illnesses, fevered, sweaty nights with nervous parents hovering about and a doctor coming into our bedroom in the middle of the night to administer a “shot”, deliver care, treatment and for our parents, as sense of comfort and confidence. Those days are long gone and the question is why. What has changed? When did medicine become the cold, callous, money driven profession that it is today? When did the doctor - patient relationship turn adversarial?

Doctors came to see third party payments as the golden cow that would crap unlimited dollars forever. They steadily increased their fees knowing that whatever bills they submitted, (or their patients submitted to their insurers), would be paid quickly and in full. Physicians began forming corporations and large group practices, purchasing lavish facilities, laboratories, and forming alliances with other physicians “groups” to keep more of the money “in the family’, so to speak. And, the money kept rolling in - in ever increasing amounts. Yes, life was good. Soon everyone wanted in on the action.

6.

For many years hospital based services were major revenue streams for hospitals. The acronyms RAPE and RAPEM represent the hospital based services: Radiology, Anesthesiology, Pathology and Emergency Medicine. (Maternity represents the “M” in RAPEM.) Physicians in these specialties were hospital employees paid by salary. This worked out well for everyone involved until these specialists recognized that they were missing out on the third party payments cash cow. Suddenly these once hospital salaried doctors were forming “Associates” and “Partners” groups, billing patients directly while also depriving the hospitals they were based in the same revenue they’d previously generated. There appears to be no end in sight for the doctors laughing all the way to the bank.

A funny thing happened along the way. Americans began living longer. The technological advances in medicine kept people alive longer; new techniques and treatment protocols, as well as more sophisticated early detection modalities all contributed to greater demands on medicine which, in turn, suddenly meant the insurance companies were paying out increasingly larger sums. The pharmaceutical industry was releasing ever more target specific proprietary medications at greater and greater expense to the patients. The insurance companies weren’t pleased. This had to stop. After all, the actuaries had not counted on the efficacy of modern medicine and did not foresee the edge of the cliff they were approaching.

7.

All these factors and more collided by the early 1990’s. Most Americans had employer provided health insurance which they paid a portion. However, the coverage began to become more and more limited while premiums kept escalating. The insurance companies began to exert greater influence on physicians and hospitals by defining what they would and would not pay for. Suddenly the actual practice of medicine, the treatment a person did or did not receive was no longer based on symptomology and the doctors judgment; insurance companies where making what where essentially clinical decisions. The docs played along because they still wanted to collect that which they still could. The perfect storm was upon us.

8.

This is a very brief, simplistic accounting of the factors and influences that have resulted in the severe crisis far too many Americans face when illness strikes. As more and more jobs are lost, more Americans are loosing their health insurance. Doctors are now opting out of Medicare because the government payments “aren’t sufficient.” Not sufficient?

The cost of medicine has always been arbitrarily set in a captive market. Physicians and hospitals had become like the organized labor operated garbage removal collectives that dominated New York City until the mid 1990’s. Collusion ran that market and it continues to run the medical market today. Mob controlled entities were the only game in town if you wanted the refuse removed from your facility. Doctors and hospital were the only game in town if you were sick or injured. The insured public became commodities. Today, a doctor’s office does not inquire about your symptoms when you first checke in for an office exam; they want to see your insurance card and, based on the robustness, or lack thereof, of your coverage, your care will be determined.

Has clinical medicine changed that dramatically? Why did a gall bladder removal cost $7000 in 1985 and $17,000 in 1995? Why are hospitals charging $8.00 for an aspirin to an inpatient? Why are doctors able to bill you $85.00 for just ducking their head in the door of your hospital room early each morning to say hello?

The entire system has only gotten progressively worse and it will continue to worsen as more and more economic, social, and demographic factors exert ever more pressure on our broken system.

9.

We are back to the beginning; the original premise of the argument made here remains. By what means, if any, can doctors and hospitals become less expensive? Of course, the special interests such as the well financed physicians lobby, will cry foul at any kind of government interference in their business. Soon, the health care industry political action committees that paid top dollar for all the politicians they have in their pockets will start the cry of “socialized medicine”! All efforts towards reform will be disingenuously blocked by the heartless, greedy entrenched interests who will use fear and smear tactics to protect their greed. This has all happened before and it will replay itself out again as the new Administration begins to discuss health care reform in earnest. Just wait and see. They will say you can’t choose your own doctor anymore; that the federal government will control your care. Their billion dollar public relations blitz will spew the same old propaganda as it has before.

Yes, we live in a capitalist system where the free markets reign supreme. Medical services are just another capitalist cog in our economic machine despite its unique nature. Free markets determine what doctors can make; how could it be any other way? Perhaps it can’t. Certainly the federal government cannot set fee for service guidelines. We see today the resistance doctors are having to alterations in Medicare and Medicaid coverage. They are protestinng loudly and petulantly over decreases in such payments. They are like the spoiled child who takes his ball home when the game doesn’t go his way. Doctors are refusing to see new Medicare patients and outright dropping care of others. They are running from those patients in droves leaving more and more ill people out in the cold.

What is the solution? Who knows? The only purpose of this discussion, aside from venting, is to toss out into the light of day the role that our wonderful and dedicated doctors have played and continue to play in this tragic, unjust, national disgrace. It is about time the truth was introduced into the public discourse and the medical community was called on to account for themselves.

That will never happen.

As the old saying goes, “the rich get richer...”

The greed of physicians knows no bounds. Just examine the facts, study the history of our current health care crisis and all that transpired to bring us to the current state of affairs.

The truth hurts. Just don’t tell your doctor that it hurts...that could cost you plenty.



Links:


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/02/business/retirementspecial/02health.html?hpw


http://www.aapsonline.org/press/getoutmc.htm


http://www.axisofgreed.org/?p=229

http://www.burntorangereport.com/diary/8347/sleazy-republican-fat-cat-to-sabotage-health-care-reform-efforts

Copyright TBC 2009 © All Rights Reserved