Wednesday, November 26, 2014

FERGUSON: THE MORNING AFTER A NIGHT OF CHAOS



PROTESTORS MARCH PEACEFULLY
IN MANY OTHER BIG CITIES
ONE OF THE DOZEN BUSINESSES SET ABLAZE IN LAST NIGHT’S CHAOS



TAGS: FERGUSON GRAND JURY DECISION, NO INDICTMENT FOR PO WILSON,

PROSECUTOR BOB McCULLOCH’S ANNOUNCEMENT, PEACEFUL DEMONSTRATORS VERSUS

LOOTERS, ARSONISTS, AND THE OPPORTUNISTIC VIOLENT ELEMENT,

MISTAKES MADE ON BOTH SIDES,

AFTER ACTION REVIEW




An After Action Review




(Wednesday November 26, 2014, FDR Drive, NYC)  For the most part those who chose for whatever reason to come out last night and block traffic here at the southern segment of the FDR, at the Manhattan Bridge and along Seventh Avenue in Times Square have been peaceful; vocal, yes, but peaceful.  Certainly there are those who are opportunistic and seize on a night such as this to cause trouble, incite anger in others and hope that the peaceful assembly will turn violent mob.  The NYPD was certainly prepared but opted to not engage the marchers and eventually, with a small number of arrests for “unlawful assembly”, “failure to comply” and “impeding” the flow of traffic, the crowds dissipated as the temperature dropped and the wind gusts grew more forceful.   The NYPD excels in all aspects of urban policing and they have mastered the art and logistics of crowd control.  Anyone who has ever been present in Times Square on New Year’s Eve can attest to this fact.

Over a thousand miles away it was difficult watching the upheaval in Ferguson Missouri in the wake of the non-indictment of Police Officer Darren Wilson.  The Ferguson Police Department and other area Law Enforcement Agencies (LEA’s) had over three months to prepare for last night and, it became painfully clear early on into the night that they had squandered that time.  In the weeks leading up to last night’s Grand Jury announcement, officials on the ground here in Ferguson, and other neighboring towns, the St. Louis County PD, the State Office of Public Safety all the way up to the Governor himself had been proclaiming their readiness for whatever last night might bring.  It is difficult to see any evidence that they were prepared.  Quite the contrary.  The night rapidly devolved into a riotous atmosphere with all the accompanying arson, looting, random gun fire, destruction of Police cars and public property.  The smoldering ashes seen today were largely family owned, local “mom and pop” establishments that serviced and employed many Ferguson residents.  To be sure, it was not the entire community that poured out into a two block commercial area stretching down Florissant Avenue to Cantwell Drive.  The majority of residents stayed home and they had no disturbances in their neighborhoods.

We have witnessed similar scenes before.  In many ways we have witnessed the same scene played out with minor variations to the general narrative of heavy handed, racially biased, predominately White Police Officers abusing, arresting, assaulting and, at times, shooting unarmed young Black men.  Are there endemic problems embedded in some of our policing practices, procedures, policies and protocols?  Yes.  And there are the hosts of social and cultural ailments so routinely recited regarding the plight of the African American, People of Color communities throughout America.  Yes, Black Americans as a whole are more likely to live in poverty, suffer high unemployment, lack sufficient basic education, are stopped and questioned by Police Officers at a disproportional rate when compared demographically to Whites, and over 48% of Black families do not have a male presence, either a father, a father figure, or a responsible, available, engaged male in the family unit.  These are sad facts but they are facts nonetheless and it is difficult to launch efforts and initiatives aimed at these eroding, destructive forces when the harsh reality also includes the rate of Black on Black crime of every category and the pernicious antagonism between the Black community and the Law Enforcement Community (LEC).

A PREPONDERANCE OF BLUNDERS

ITEM ONE: THE PROSECUTOR

It will be argued in criminal justice classes, Police Academies, in academia and the LEC at large what precisely was the etiology for the eruption in Ferguson last night especially given the months official had to prepare.  It is often awkward to critique another LEA from afar and from a “Monday morning quarterback” stance.  That aside, there were plainly obvious a few major errors made by all involved from the Prosecutor to the Ferguson PD and beyond. 

Bob McCulloch, the St. Louis County Prosecutor, the son of a Police Officer killed in the line of duty by a Black man when he was 12 years old, was from day one very obviously not up to the task.  While we must err to the side of the 12 members of the Grand Jury who did their due diligence and deliberated in good faith based on the evidence and testimony they were exposed to over the last three months, we can question some of the particulars McCulloch chose to present even though he himself noted that some of the witnesses “made up” testimony while others “heard things from other people” prior to testifying.  If there were ant suspect witnesses, witnesses that did not pass the bar of credibility, it is fair to ask the Prosecutor why he opted to have them testify, under oath, before the Grand Jury.

Even more problematic than the manner in which the Grand Jury appears to have been conducted was McCulloch’s inexplicable rationale for making the announcement at 8 o’clock PM local time and delivering an odd soliloquy that could have easily been interpreted as a defense of PO Wilson.  There is not proof that McCulloch steered the Grand Jury in the direction he wanted it to go but some of his actions that have come to light do raise concerns particularly his unprecedented 20 minute summary to the media.  One could reasonably assume a prosecutor sitting on the hottest case in the United States for three months would have been far more adept and skilled when delivering the Grand Jury findings knowing the potential for serious trouble was at hand.

ITEM TWO: THE POLICE

Leaving Officer Wilson aside for the time, the 54 person Ferguson Police Department was never and could never have been prepared for the widespread civil disobedience they encountered last August in the days and weeks following the shooting death of 18 year old Michael Brown.  From the most basic, rudimentary tasks to be conducted at a crime scene, particularly a shooting “death by Cop” crime scene, were bungled, fumbled and ignored.  As the Grand Jury evidence so starkly proves, virtually all involved in the “investigation” as Michael Brown’s body lay in the street, either did not know what they were doing or were being willfully negligent.  Yes, these are harsh assertions yet a reading of the Grand Jury transcripts contain so many self-incriminating statements by those on the scene and at the Ferguson Police HQ, that it boggles the mind.  There was gross, florid negligence; a complete failure to secure the crime scene, the physical evidence and Officer Wilson’s post-shooting actions and statements that any Law Enforcement Officer (LEO) no matter their personal opinion on the events in Ferguson must concede that the ineptitude – be it a lack of proper training or a failure to follow precise protocols – is inexcusable.  The Ferguson PD has a joint mutual aide agreement with the St. Louis County PD and they should have immediately contacted the larger LEA to preserve and begin the investigative process at the scene. 

ITEM THREE: THE PROTESTORS

In deference to honest, open debate, those Ferguson residents who began marching and protesting immediately after the shooting were voicing real hurt, frustration, and sadness.  Those hot August nights initially were violent interactions between members of the community and Law Enforcement.  It was a moving site to see as mothers pushed their infant children in strollers with their hands in the “Don’t Shoot” posture that became the indelible symbol for the entire reactionary movement.  But, as is always the case, others – outsiders – poured into Ferguson with the sole objective of creating trouble, making havoc and looting.  Nothing says you support a specific cause more than looting local businesses, right?  

Again, open debate insists we must be willing to examine the issues at hand from all sides.  While Officer Wilson testified that he feared for his life and has “no regrets” about the incident and that the outcome would have been the same if Michael Brown was a White man instead of a Black man, when a predominately African American community is policed by what is virtually an “All White” Police force, there exists a natural antagonism if not flaming distrust; an unavoidable rift in which every citizen/police encounter can be assessed through the prism of race and skin color. 

As a broad spectrum of mostly young New Yorker’s marched and blocked traffic last night to express, interchangeably, their collective anger at and frustration with a Police/Criminal Justice system that is inherently and deeply flawed, perceives people of color as “less than”, commits atrocities and acts of murder with impunity on members of those communities, the powers that be do not have the ability to dissuade them of those core beliefs.  Every time a White LEO shoots or otherwise engages physically with a person of color, to the protestors and other like-minded people, it is a criminal incident for which the police Officer must be “punished”.

ITEM FOUR: PUNISHMENT

The Black community is quick to call for punishment for every LEO that has ever been involved in a “Black on White” confrontation no matter the circumstances and details.  Their calls for “justice” often prove to be nothing more than the cause of the day.  Yes, there are without question some isolated reasons that the Black and Latino community can be skeptical of Police accounts of one incident or another.  Unfortunately for everyone, only the Police Officers who patrol our streets, housing projects, drug and crime infested neighborhoods know what the denizens of the night look like and what they are capable of. 

Arm chair critics, aggrieved liberals, and all the multicultural, African American scholars throughout the land should roll one night in an RMP with two Officers charged with enforcing the law in their particular sector.  What they might likely witness would make them scared; sick to the stomach with fear of the sheer raw violence that ensues often even in the most non-confrontational encounter.  Streets that hum with the hustle and bustle of commerce, of people going to and from work, of children coming back from school and playing on the sidewalks and in the streets in the light of day, become transformed later in the small dark hours of the morning when they more resemble an alien landscape defined by shadows and corners that may or may not conceal a life or death threat.  And during the in between moments those very same Police Officers render assistance to the sick, answer the call of the battered women and children, emergency scenarios of every type, and comport themselves in the truest nature of public servants.   

What many of the residents of Ferguson and activists who insinuated themselves into the fray there have long called for “justice” for Michael Brown when, in reality, they want to have Officer Wilson punished; they seek the completion of the ancient “eye for an eye” maxim based not on facts but on perceptions.  PO Wilson has become the convenient scapegoat representing every White Law Enforcement Officer everywhere who has ever had a contentious interaction with a Black person. 

ITEM FIVE: PASTORS, PREACHERS AND PUNDITS

Sometimes it is stunningly striking how “men of the cloth”, Clergy members approach volatile events and the issues that often are behind them.  While in one instance they call on their congregants’ better nature and plead for reasoned and rational peaceful responses to troubling incidents in their communities, they can, in the very next breath utter words from their pulpits that only serve to further the divide between Black and White, between Law Enforcement and the communities they minister to.  It needs to be mentioned that many inner city members of the Clergy seek to set the proper tone in defining their congregants and the children of such in their sermons and lessons concerning the proper way to interact with the police.

Yes, there are many of every race, color and creed who stridently complain that no one should have to “teach” their children how to interact with members of the LEC.  They have a point but it is a dull point, not capable of penetrating the reality of hostility and anger deeply held by the young members of the community.  Pop culture has a guilty role in this dynamic as they continue to glorify and celebrate “Thug Life”, “Old School Gangsters”, and remain continuously devoid of any measure of social responsibility.  Those who will protest and assail this claim are ignoring another aspect of reality.

Then, of course, there are the pundits, the “Professional Black’s” and “Professional Liberals” who are all too willing and able to stoke the flames of discrimination, oppression, and prejudice no matter what the facts may be.  These are often the shrillest voices on any issue that even has a shadow of a connotation of racism in Police relations with the Black public.  They have high profile platforms from which to elaborate, pontificate, and proliferate their own views, as a means leading to an end that enhances their own public profile while adding to their personal wealth.  These exploiters are the worst of the worst yet they continue to prey on their own community while blatantly appealing to the lowest common denominator in the hearts and minds of their captive audiences.

ITEM SIX:    PERCEPTION

As sure as the sun rises in the east the perceptions regarding all the events in Ferguson reflect the sharp polarization between Black America and White America.  In many ways the images from last night served only to cement the deeply held convictions of each side.  Black America reacted to what they see as an indifferent Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice system in which their lives are not valued, where it is nearly impossible to get fair treatment and that the Police can due as they please with impunity.  White America sees the flames in the night and roaming crowds looting and ravaging the very same neighborhood in which they live, work and worship and call those perpetrators “animals and savages”.  Such harsh words in and of themselves help perpetuate the worst of perceptions on both sides.

Human perception is based largely on previous experiences that have been reinforced time and time again.  From our own unique perch we assess the world around us and have a natural affinity for circumstances and events that comport with our perceptions.  This makes it very difficult to have any kind of “open, honest” debate about such an emotionally charged atmosphere as events play out in Ferguson.  The distrust on both sides of this Black and White equation seems to remain intractable. 

Many in White America express frustration about the state of race relations today.  Those of a certain age recall the riots that plagued the Deep South and larger Northern cities prior to the Voter’s Rights and Civil Rights Acts.  Others express a level of disgust noting the years of Affirmative Action, racial quotas in some workplaces, and housing and now have little to no sympathy for the plight of the Black community.  Yes, the Black community in some of the largest urban areas has advanced minimally over the last 50 years and the reasons for this stagnation are many and varied but this is not the time to explore them.  We can take some of them as tacit proof that Black America faces obstacles White America does not.  Yet, there is never a good reason to act up in a violent manner; arson, looting and widespread civil disorder, as we have previously noted, have no place in society and are more than counterproductive for those who perpetrate such activities.

TOMORROWS

Tomorrow the damage in Ferguson will be surveyed as the remnants of last night’s fires smolder in the rubble of were thriving businesses.  The Ferguson PD and the other LEA involved on the ground last night review their tactics and strategy going forward.  Tomorrow and all the tomorrows to follow People on both sides will either be willing to move on or they won’t.  The LEA’s will conduct “after action reviews” to identify where and why they allowed last night to get so far out of hand.  Hopefully leaders and others from the Black community will evaluate what the proper path ahead is.  There are certainly acceptable ways to express anger at “the system” but it will not be found in the hearts and minds of those who seek anarchy and violence.  This is the time for all the self-appointed Black Activists and leaders, preachers and pundits to step up to the plate in an effort to enact initiatives geared towards positive change; the kind of change that helps bridge the divide.  The proof will be in what tact the Black community opts for.  People of goodwill exist on both sides and it will be incumbent upon them to steer the discourse.  The status quo will only lead to the next Ferguson.



























 Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2014 © All Rights Reserved


Thursday, November 20, 2014

MEDIA CIRCUS RAMPING UP IN FERGUSON



FERGUSON READIES FOR ACT TWO
MEDIA DESCENDS ON SMALL TOWN AGAIN.

TAGS:  MICHAEL BROWN, POLICE OFFICER DARREN WILSON,
FERGUSON MISSOURI, GRAND JURY, CIVIL UNREST, MEDIA HYPE,
MEDIA IRRESPONSIBILITY, MEDIA MAKING THE STORY,
SOCIAL COMMENT, CULTURAL OBSERVATION






(Thursday November 20, 2014, Ferguson, MO) It’s a cool 36 degrees on the ground here and the night comes on fast.  People out on the streets are bundled up in heavy coats, woolen hats, scarves and gloves.  They seem to move at a faster pace in the cold then they did when this community made its original introduction to the rest of America.  Given the atmospherics here literally and metaphorically, this cold winter weather may come as a blessing for when “The Announcement” comes.  Of course we are referring to “The Announcement” as to whether or not the St. Louis County Grand Jury empaneled to hear and see the evidence in the case of the White Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson and decide if he should be criminally indicted for the shooting death of the young Black man who was unarmed, Michael Brown last August 9th.  For variously suspect to patently absurd reasons officials here from the Governor Jay Nixon down to the County and Ferguson Police Department Chiefs have been publically extolling all the “measures” they’ve taken to cover every possible contingency once the Grand Jury’s findings are made public.  There is a self-perpetuating element to this kind of lead up to a lead up to a possible event; preparing for potential public disorder and discussing it so publically in the media seems to be almost inviting trouble. 

Perhaps the authorities see their public pronouncements as good public service as well as a warning to anyone, especially “outside agitators” who might want to travel to Ferguson, co-mingle with peaceful demonstrators and incite violence; violence against what is perceived as a “militarized” police force here in this community north of St. Louis.  There were some chaotic nights in the immediate aftermath of the death of Mr. Brown but it never evolved into full scale rioting.  It appeared at times that each side, the protestors and the Police were parrying with each other, collectively bobbing and weaving as boxers do in the early rounds as they try to size up and get the range on their opponent.  It could have gotten very nasty very quickly but neither side was really up for that kind of fight.  The 54 member Ferguson Police Department was clearly overwhelmed and, if only for crowd control purposes, needed the reinforcements from the St. Louis County Police, Missouri State Police and a small National Guard contingent to man an operations center.  The media presence, at times, appeared to dwarf the number of protestors as the days wore on. 

Now the media have begun to trickle back.  They broadcast live on the evening “news” standing in front of boarded up businesses; businesses apparently expecting trouble to follow the Grand Jury’s findings. In this bizarre world we live today the media are often the story or they at least promulgate a nugget of innuendo, rumor, supposition or some “anonymous source” and conflate it into a story.  They no longer cover or report the “news”.  No, they are much more than pure journalists and reporters; they are TV personalities, celebrities and any corner of our culture any dark hole in society that they chose to illuminate with their klieg lights becomes news.

Yes, now they are back sticking microphones into anyone’s face that slows down enough to be ambushed.  Then again, there is something alluring, something magnetic about the idea of being seen on TV that is difficult to understand. It is akin to an intoxicant for many and a validation of something, (?) for many more,  We are a TV, media, Facebook, Skype, YouTube culture so perhaps it is understandable why people so eagerly appear on TV even in the midst of their greatest tragedies and losses. And, the media is fully cognizant of this fact.  They really need not ambush anyone except some sleazy politico caught with his hand in the bag trying to duck out the side door of The Capitol.  No, most folks seem to want to be on TV no matter the cause, purpose or how much of themselves, self-dignity or self-regard they will ultimately surrender.  Just look at “The Jerry Springer Show” or “Maury”.

So the celebrity reporters are trolling the streets speaking with locals.  They have found every gun shop in the greater St. Louis Area to report that gun sales have jumped by 700%! And that most of their newest customers are women.  Yes, this is the setting the media is preparing.

HYPE

In the weeks leading up to a major pay per view prizefight, the broadcasting network will hype the event with what can seem like continuous airings of the fighter’s profiles down to the minutest details of their lives and careers.  Fights, prize or otherwise, lend themselves to hype, they are the physical confrontation of two men, mano y mano, on a grand and glitzy stage broadcast worldwide, wagered on and highly anticipated.  The hype is the vehicle to build anticipation.  As fight night drawers closer, the hype is knocked up a gear into overdrive and the anticipation is at its peak.  Often the fight does not come anywhere near matching the hype but, when it does, it is a special sporting moment in the most solo of singular sports.

For the last four weeks the newsertainment outlets have begun hyping an event that typically is not a reason for hype.  But, in the dizzied, never-ending, 24/7 cable news, breaking news, continuing coverage, live on location, breathlessly hyperbolic environment we live in, anything can be hyped regardless of whether or not it should be.  Hype impacts our lives at every turn and sometimes we fail to recognize that we are being fed hype.  Because the 24/7 worth of airtime to fill the cable “news” outlets need to make mountains out of molehills; they need to have a flashy graphic with appropriately moody music for the intro to “the latest development” despite the fact that the latest development has been the latest development for 8 or 9 hours.  The repetition of the hype and hyperbole provides the background din in American culture.

TIMING

If there is one thing everyone in the Law Enforcement Community is well aware of is that the long, hot nights of summer, those humid sticky nights that top off the ends of blistering heat are the toughest times in the City.  The heat of passion is sometimes just the passion of heat.  So, in that regard it is fortunate that the Grand Jury findings will be released in the middle of the harsh November chill that has settled over most of the country and is certainly carried on the cold winds that come out of the northwest.

Ferguson on a night like this seems like a sodium arc lamp lit ghost town.  Very few pedestrians walk the streets; the few that do have their shoulders hunched into the collars of their coats against the cold.  The traffic is very light and all appears peaceful.  Smoke wafts out of chimneys and the houses and apartments are alit from within.  This weather does not seem very conducive to any kind of long term outdoor nocturnal demonstrations no matter what the findings are. 

There have been reports that cities across America are preparing for some possibility of “isolated social unrest” in their Black communities if Officer Wilson is not indicted.  Those Officials in cities such as Cleveland, Chicago, Buffalo and all across the Midwest, into the northeast and down into Dixie will have the frigid temperatures on their sides; it’s far easier to get riled up and hoot and holler when it’s 85 degrees than it is when it is 20 degrees.

TRUTH

Hopefully those citizens who comprise the Grand Jury in this case have been taking their task seriously.  Most Grand Juries do. While not sequestered they have been instructed by the Judge to avoid any accounts of the case in the media but, naturally, they live in the real world, work in the real world, and cannot avoid all the coverage.  The best they can do is remain ever objective.  Objectivity and rigorous adherence to the facts, not disputed information, simply the empirical facts, will lead them to the truth.  Whatever that truth is or is not let it not be exploited by anyone on either side of the racial divide, the gaping maw of distrust between the African American communities and the Law Enforcement Community across this country.  There has been ample exploitation here already.










Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2014 © All Rights Reserved

Friday, November 14, 2014

OFFICER WILSON’S FATE MAY DEPEND ON FORENSIC PATHOLOGY


FERGUSON AWAITS GRAND JURY FINDINGS
AUTOPSIES RESULTS WILL PLAY KEY ROLE
FORENSIC PATHOLOGIST DR. MICHAEL BADEN AT PRESS

CONFERENCE EXPLAINING HIS PRELIMINARY AUTOPSY FINDINGS

AS LAWYERS FOR THE BROWN FAMILY LOOK ON


TAGS: PO DARREN WILSON, FERGUSON, MISSOURI, MICHAEL BROWN UNARMED,

RACIAL TENSIONS, FORENSIC PATHOLOGY, DR. MICHAEL BADEN, FORENSICS AND

FORENSIC AUTOPSY, THE ART AND SCIENCE OF THE FORENSIC AUTOPSY

ST. LOUIS COUNTY GRAND JURY




(Friday November, 14, Ferguson, MO)  The headlines are ominous; they are already predicting with an exaggerated sense of foreboding how this community will react if the Grand Jury currently hearing the evidence against Police Officer Darren Wilson, the White Ferguson Officer who shot and killed an unarmed Black 18 year old, Michael Brown on the afternoon of August 9th, 2014.  That event served as a catalyst that ignited the anger, near riotous mob behavior that was as much about this predominantly Black community has long felt the alleged heavy hands of a Police Force with a sole Black Officer.  The history of this small town has been marred by racial tensions between citizens and those who enforce the law.  This particular episode made national headlines after President Obama dispatched the United States Attorney General, Eric Holder, the top law enforcement official in the country, to Ferguson, ostensibly to meet with the Brown family and the usual roster of “Black Activists”, “Community Leaders” and bellicose reverends of all stripe to assure  the citizenry that “justice will be served”.  Just as disturbing have been recent statements in the press from the head of the Missouri chapter of the KKK.  All the elements for a potentially volatile scenario once the Grand Jury’s findings are made public are gathering here.

 On the immediate nights after Michael Brown’s death demonstrations and protests paralyzed this community.  Once peace was restored demonstrations continued in an orderly manner despite the still simmering frustration that ran like an ugly undercurrent through this town.  The Brown family retained the services of several well know attorneys who had represented families who had lost a child under similar circumstances.  The now familiar narrative of White Police Officers abusing and even killing young Black men is never as clear cut as the public perceives them.  Yet, no matter what the actual, substantiated factual accounts are typically ignored or reflexively dismissed as White Cops sticking up for one another, obstructing justice, and having tacit approval from their superiors that they can do as they please out on the streets and a criminal justice system that endemically treats African Americans much differently than they do White people.

The central assertions of the case are well known.  The points of contention, the very factors that will determine Officer Wilson’s fate, are more complex and findings of competing post mortem examination will be the deciding evidence to either indict PO Wilson or not.  Despite what the public may believe about crime scene investigation, autopsies and forensics, concepts they’ve likely picked up from viewing all the CSI and police procedural TV programs, are presented in an unrealistically simple manner that bears scant resemblance to the actual work performed by Police Detectives, Forensic Scientists from an array of specialties, and the Forensics Pathologist.  In some case the investigation of an unnatural death, a murder, can yield evidentiary information that requires as much art as it does science; as much interpreting all the findings and working to establish a cohesive, coherent body of proof and, ultimately, court testimony. 

WHERE THE LIVING SPEAK FOR THE DEAD

Above the entrance to most Autopsy Suites in the country is an old Latin admonition, or some abbreviated version of it, to be heeded by those about to enter.  In English it is: “Let idle talk be silenced.  Let laughter be banished.  This is the place where Death rejoices to teach those who live”.

To the uninitiated the Autopsy Suite can be an intimidatingly discomforting place. Just the realization of what transpires in the stark stainless tell, cold, impersonal environment is sufficient to cause some to get more than a little jittery.  But the environment is such because it is specifically designed, constructed and intended for one purpose and one purpose only: the performance of post mortem examinations.  In spite of what some view as a gruesome, loathsome task, the autopsy is a solemn medical procedure with one purpose; to attempt to determine the cause of death – the manner and method – that transpired to result in a particular body to be placed beneath the bright lights above the autopsy table.  Autopsies are conducted for a wide range of reasons from accessing the efficacy of some treatment modality, to rule in or out suicide, for insurance purposes, and as teaching experiencing.  Arguably, the most important reason for an autopsy is as a Forensics tool; the opportunity for the Forensics Pathologist to dissect and study a body that was felled under criminal or suspicious circumstances.  It is in this scenario that the autopsy can become the final arbiter of truth.

HANDS UP, HANDS DOWN

The autopsies conducted on the body of Michael Brown have each documented the various gunshot wounds, there location, whether they were entry or exit wounds and, upon internal examination, which one or ones where the actual manner of death.  Often a body can sustain numerous gunshots and it becomes the Forensic Pathologists responsibility if a single gunshot or the collective damage of several shots caused death.  In cases where bullets are recovered, the Ballistics specialists are able to identify if the bullets recovered covered came from one firearm or several.  But in this case there is but one firearm and one shooter involved. 

It has been alleged that PO Wilson and Mr. Brown were involved in an altercation while Wilson was still seated in his patrol car and there has been evidence recovered to support this claim; the evidence being Brown’s blood on Wilson’s shirt.  After this alleged confrontation Mr. Brown did I fact walk away from PO Wilson as reported by eye witness accounts and the absence of gunshot residue on Brown’s body or clothing.  This is indicative of Wilson firing his weapon from a distance – between 6 and 20 feet – from Mr. Brown.  What the Forensic Pathologists also had to study closely were the clothes Mr. Brown wore on that fateful day.  If his hands were raised in a “don’t shoot” position, the entry wounds and entry point on his shirt would be in line with each other.  Many cases come down to this sort of evidence.  When points of entry on clothing do not comport with entry wounds on the body, much can be said as to the actual physical distance, position and posture of the victim.  Conflicting reports have been leaked by people purporting to be privy to the on-going Grand Jury testimony say there is evidence supporting both sides in this tragic story but it is imperative that the Grand jury completes their sacred task before anything approaching the real “truth” can be made available.

MULTIPLE AUTOPSIES MUDDIED THE WATER

As has been reported, the body of Michael Brown went through three autopsies.  The simple facts and details of the procedure are clear; the first autopsy, if conducted completely in accordance with standard forensics post mortem procedures and protocols, is the most important and the best source of medico-legal information.  Once a body is subjected to a thorough post mortem, any ensuing examinations are extremely limited in making any kind of determination besides some of the most obvious.  Frankly, a complete autopsy is an in-depth examination of the external condition of the corpse and, once the “Y” shaped incision made, the body is splayed open.  After examination of the corpse in this state, the internal viscera are each removed, weighed, measured, examined and sample of tissue are taken to be made into microscopic slides for later study by the Pathologist.

In the Forensic setting particular attention is obvious paid to any physical signs of violence, trauma, or insult.  The dead body speaks volumes if the Forensics team is astute enough to listen.  In this case, Mr. Brown’s internal examination prior to any removal of organs, was exhaustively studied to trace the damage made by the bullets that ultimately hit him.  There has been much written and reported about a head wound and the entry point of that particular wound that was most likely the one single shot most responsible for his death.  The wound’s position is a determining factor in whether or not Mr. Brown was standing up right, standing up right with his head bowed to a certain degree or, if he was on his knees with or without his head bowed to one degree or another.  The position of that entry wound on the head would indicate that the 6’ 4” Mr. Brown was perhaps falling face-forward down or otherwise in a non-standing compromised posture.  The entire Grand Jury testimony may come down to this singular question because its accurate answer based on the pathological findings has the potential to make or break the case.

In the case of Mr. Brown it remains unclear who had access to what evidence and when?  There were initial reports that the St. Louis county coroner did not have Mr. Brown’s clothes to examine while the autopsy conducted on behalf on the family by arguably the most famous, respected, and brilliant Forensic Pathologist in America, Dr. Michael Baden, had either some or all of the clothing to examine.  A third post mortem conducted by an FBI forensics team probably was more redundant and useless than helpful or insightful.  With three separate and distinct autopsies it was probably a mighty chore for the County Prosecutor to decide what forensic pathology evidence he chose to present to the Grand Jury.  Even in the most unambiguous of circumstances, the medico-legal information provided to the Prosecutor is often presented clumsily and inaccurately.  It is the job of the Prosecutor to take what is often very technical medical information and put it in terms that can be easily understood by a jury, a jury typically composed of blue-collar, working class people typically unfamiliar with such complex information.  Since jurors tend to take their civic duty seriously and, in a Grand Jury setting, they may ask many questions to have points of testimony clarified. 

THE TRUTH

In any homicide but particularly in a case as emotionally charged, high profile, and controversial as is this, the truth is what is sought.  The truth, some call it justice, is what all the autopsies and investigatory procedures are about.  The details of the volumes of information and testimony given to the Grand Jury over the course of the last three months contains the truth or, at least, as much of the truth as can be determined by all the cumulative data.  Police Officer Wilson has provided his “side” of his confrontation with Michael Brown just as have eye witnesses and other bystanders who were close enough to the scene of the crime to offer some valuable auditory information.  Even at this time and despite the constant drip of leaks from sources within the investigation, no one knows what the truth is.  Everyone has an opinion as is their right.  Much of the opinion is split along the deeply gouged color line in America; Black Americans believe that White Officer Wilson shot Mr. Brown without “just cause” a line of thought that is at the heart of much of the racial tensions between White Law Enforcement Officers (LEO’s) and Black men, particularly young Black men.

What is at stake regarding this Grand Jury’s verdict is the matter of whether or not to indict Officer Wilson on a charge of homicide, manslaughter or some similar charge.  Given the amount of media coverage this case garnered in the immediate wake of the incident that left Mr. Brown dead, the eyes of the country will be upon Ferguson when the Grand Jury’s findings are released to the public.  Police here and Police Departments in a number of cities across America are making contingency plans if the verdict is not the one the Black community hopes for.

In the movie “A Few Good Men” the Marine Corps Officer played by the actor Jack Nicholson famously shouted at the prosecutor from the witness box, “You can’t handle the truth”.  Likely within days we will learn what the Grand Jury has learned and we will see if we can “handle” such truth.




























 Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2014 © All Rights Reserved






Tuesday, November 11, 2014

VETERANS DAY 2014


THE UNEQUAL BURDEN
 OF SACRIFICE UNSHARED
A VETERANS DAY COMMENTARY


(Updated Wednesday November 12, 2014)

(Tuesday November 11, 2014, NYC)  It was once the great equalizer, the common experience that was the cementing mortar that held our society together.  When sacrifice is borne by all; shared across all strata of society, it creates a stronger more cohesive nation more prone towards unity than division. 

We are engaged and have been actively fighting wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and other lesser known locales under the auspices of our “war on terror” with an entirely volunteer military.  The generation of combat veterans, young warriors who have seen fierce, brutal battle, represent a mere 1% of their peer group and many of those who volunteered prior to September 11, 2001, had enlisted into the Reserves and National Guard primarily for the educational benefits used to attract young men and women to the military services.  Few, if any signed up for multiple deployments and the stresses that accompany such involvement.

LOOKING BACK: VIETNAM

By January 1973 we were a war weary country; a people who had long past the point of supporting our efforts in the jungles of that far off place that became synonymous with guerrilla warfare and the harsh brutalities of fighting a largely unseen enemy in an environment they knew intimately.  The public, particularly the parents of the young men and women serving in Vietnam were questioning the strategy, tactics and the rationale for continuing this protracted campaign, a campaign that would never grant us a clearly defined victory. 

And it was that year of 1973 on January 27th that President Nixon put a moratorium on the military draft and ultimately did away with it for good.  No longer would our military services be comprised of conscripts; service would from that time forward be voluntary.  Our country lost much in this exchange, perhaps far more than anyone could have realized back in that troubled summer of protest and open defiance of the draft in 1972 that culminated in the complete end of the draft as announced by Nixon on January 27, 1973. By the time the last troops were finally airlifted out of a riotous Saigon on April 30, 1975, the country and military would slowly come to terms with what felt like a defeat but Nixon called “Peace with Honor.”  For much of the nation and the military itself, the after effects known as the “Vietnam Hangover” set in and would ossify our military for years to come.  The military had lost its luster and had been marred by the harsh realities our troops had experienced and witnessed during a war like no one we had seen up to that time in our history.  It would take the military almost two decades to develop new strategies and tactics for guerrilla, “asymmetrical” warfare.

THAT WAS THEN, THIS IS NOW

The Vietnam era marked the end of the concept of shared sacrifice.  No longer would young men from every city and town, of every race and creed, from every rung on the socioeconomic ladder forever have memories and at least that one similarity.  The country went from every young man being in “The Service” to a massive retreat from the military and an insidious vilification of Vietnam veterans, the kind of hostility and disdain previous legions of veterans had never experienced.  Those were dark days and it would be many years before the American public found their collectively lost spine and once again were willing to send troops to combat zones. 

But the troops who were sent to fight our battles were often drawn from the lowest caste of society.  The military became a refuge for those without other opportunities, for men and women to escape poverty and perhaps learn a trade of some kind that would allow them to prosper, at least minimally, in civilian life.  However, no matter their points of origin or intentions, they served with courage and valor whenever called upon to do so.

The shared sacrifice and common experience of past generations of veterans has become cheaply replaced by a largely unaffected public who fly the American flag in front of their homes and have “Support our Troops” bumper stickers on their pick-ups as if these are potent symbols of a patriot.  They are no such thing.  Most young people today and their parents wouldn’t think of having a son or daughter enlist in the military.  They have seen what those who served in Afghanistan and Iraq have been through; the multiple deployments because of a shortage of ready and qualified troops, a Veterans Administration system completely unprepared to adequately care for the thousands upon thousands of returning veterans with traumatic limb amputations, brain injuries and other horrific battle wounds as well as the unknown battalions of those who suffer, often in silence, wracked by PTSD, depression, alcohol and drug abuse, unemployment and even homelessness. An extremely disturbing and sad fact is that every 65 hours another combat veteran takes his or her own life.

When suicide on that scale becomes the norm there is something institutionally, almost sinfully wrong.  We as a people have not held up our end of "The Pact", the once sacred Covenant that assures our veterans of the care they need.   What are we as a country, as a people, that we stand idly by while tens of thousands of young people suffer these medical and mental maladies and the indignities of hunger, poverty and homelessness?  What is the message we are sending our veterans and anyone considering enlisting?  The answers to these questions say much about our shared neglect and that is directly related to our loss of shared experience.

RE-INSTITUTE THE DRAFT

There was a time when virtually all our elected officials including those in the Senate and House had served in the military.  Those men (those bodies were composed largely of men until the mid-1970’s) who had first-hand experience of the horrors of combat were far more deliberate and reluctant to put American troops “in harm’s way” without a clear threat to our national security or vital national interests.  Former Five Star General and United States President, Dwight D. Eisenhower, the famed World War II commander of the European theater of operations, often spoke of the caution that ought to be used before committing our troops to battle.  He also warned of the vast “military–industrial–congressional complex” that was developing towards his last years as President and how war-making was becoming a lucrative endeavor as the Cold War was developing.  Had his prescient warnings been heeded much of American military history over the last 60 years would have been very different.

If the chicken hawks and war-mongers in Congress continue to seek to commit our troops as they see fit, this time of perpetual warfare cannot be sustained solely by enlistees.  It is a matter of simple arithmetic and attrition.  There are only so many active troops available for foreign forays into ill-defined missions without fully understanding the stakes involved or even the facts on the ground, history of the warring factions and why, exactly, are “we” there. Military incursions without a clearly defined and acknowledged "exit strategy" will inevitably devolve into a murky quagmire. Once sucked into a quagmire and "nation building" our formidable military might is reduced to the facts on the ground which are always to our disadvantage. 

On this Veteran’s Day we should spend a moment contemplating the true meaning of the day, reexamine what patriotism means to us, and learn to not be content to blindly follow our elected officials into untenable combat circumstances.  We have intervened enough in the last 13 years.  We should also find it within ourselves the sufficient amount of gratitude that should be bestowed upon all veterans no matter when or where they served.  They are truly the best of us as a people and represent us best as a country.

 Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2014 © All Rights Reserved