Wednesday, August 31, 2016

WARS WITHOUT END



UNTOLD CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
…AND THEN WE SEE HIM

TAGS: WARS IN SYRIA, IRAQ, ACROSS NORTH AFRICA, ETHNIC CLEANSING,
WAR CRIMES, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, HUMANITARIAN CRISIS,
THE REAL COSTS OF WAR, WAR AND WARFARE THROUGH THE AGES
 


(Saturday August 20, 2016 Central Park, NYC) Before the syndrome was officially named after much clinical study of the afflicted what we know today as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) there were less refined diagnosis of Shell Shock, Combat Stress, Battle Fatigue and the wholly descriptive “Thousand Yard Stare” that many combat veterans wore long after the fighting was over.  After WWI and WWII there was shame assigned to returning veterans who somehow seemed different; they had returned from the horrors they witnessed and participated in sometimes as empty husks of the men they had been before going to war.  In the decades since, much has been learned about PTSD, its etiology, symptomology, testing, and diagnosis (often a laborious process) and methodology regarding standards of care, support and treatment. 

As the fields of neurology, neuropsychiatry, sophisticated brain imaging, psychology and pharmacology have continued to establish more truths and a body of working knowledge about all aspects of PTSD, it is heartening to see that this latest generation of combat veterans we have produced over the last 15 years are getting diagnosed and treated without stigma.

It is more than academic to note that men who have been prepared for the execution of the wars we send them off to, men and women who have received the highest quality training, equipment, and support can still succumb to the ravages of battles past that rattle around in their brains long after they have returned home.  If such highly trained and readied Soldiers, Airmen, and Marines and Special Forces operatives are susceptible to PTSD, what must battle do to a young child’s brain?  Because, in the on-going wars as in wars past, children in the combat zone suffer the most.  That point was forcefully brought into sharp focus as the photograph of a 5-year-old boy in Syria spread across the world.  Yes, a picture is worth a thousand words and this particular one speaks volumes; volumes of the chaos and death, destruction of homes and families, of lives and minds that is a unique side effect of life in a war zone.

OUR CHILDREN

Central Park in Manhattan is a 400-acre oasis of greenery, foliage, playgrounds and meadows, bike and walking paths, family picnics and impromptu soccer games, stickball and pick-up baseball games and is in a very real way just another neighborhood park albeit larger and better known than most others.  On a recent warm afternoon kids could be seen playing on the various swing sets as hyper alert moms sat on the periphery carefully monitoring their children’s activities.  Flocks of young girls riding brightly colored two wheelers while donning equally colorful crash helmets just in case they take a tumble.  On an open field with a gentle rise young girls in soccer uniforms were doing practice drills wearing protective shin guards also, just in case.

From the moment children are born today they are handled, packaged, transported, tended to as extreme fragile goods.  As toddlers they are strapped into to “baby seats” that offer more protection than the tiny space capsule John Glenn rode as he orbited the earth.  Any sniffle, sneeze, wheeze and whimper could signify the onset of some disease and must be addressed by the family pediatrician.  You get the point.  We do know the fragility of our children; their developing minds and bodies require a certain amount of attention.  Fortunately, at least to the naked eye, all the park attendees the other day appeared to have at least some level of financial means to provide all the protective equipment.

And then we saw that picture, as iconic a war photo as has ever been published.  We see a small boy, 5-year-old wounded Syrian child Omran Daqneesh, blood and dust stained sitting in the back of an ambulance after being plucked from the mangled rumble that had once been his home.  Young Omran’s face tells a tale of age and ages.  His look is not stoic; clearly his young mind may have shut down in a reflex of self-preserving neural activity. Having lived through lord knows how many bombing raids and occasions of death up close he now wears the “Thousand Yard Stare”.   Omran has never taken a breath of air in his five years on earth that was not somehow infused with the horrors of war.  What can the future hold for him and the millions of other young children who’ve spent the entirety of their lives thus far living amid the death and destruction of war?  The true casualties of war – any war – are the children in harm’s way.  But this is nothing new; we just seem at times to forget to imagine what their perception of their world is.

WARFARE

As is the case with all areas of human endeavors war and warfare have evolved.  Early humans fought other families and small groups over territory with sticks and stones.  With each step up the epochal ladder man become ever more effective in developing weapons by which to wage war.  The reasons for war evolved as well and, in a global sense, since the early 20th century war had become a “conventional” apparatus by which to acquire or secure expanding territory, control natural resources, and, by WWII the means to advance political ideology.  The “Cold War” pitted Democratic Capitalism against Fascist Communism as represented by the United State and the Soviet Union respectively.  Many “proxy” wars were fought under that overarching rubric.  As the weaponry had advanced through all manner of new armaments, artillery and military/naval/aerial platforms that could more effectively deliver death and destruction farther removed from the fields of battle, we had learned to split the atom, to use plutonium and hydrogen as the ultimate means to literally destroy the world as we know it.  The USA versus the USSR was a stand-off codified by the notion of MAD - Mutually Assured Destruction.

Recently there has been a retrograde development in what had been an uninterrupted continuum of ever increasing military sophistication as well as the reasons behind the conflicts of today as well.  The wars now ablaze across vast swathes of regions around the globe are “asymmetrical” and once again as in the times of antiquity fought among tribes, religions, and age old ethnic antagonism.  With our blunt force superiority in all manners of executing our wars we have become farther and farther removed from the blood and rubble.  Death can be delivered by Tomahawk missiles from a thousand miles away or by unmanned drones silently stalking our enemies before eradicating them.  Among all this death and destruction are the innocents; the native populations paying the ultimate price for the actions of a certain tribe or religious sect, some brutal despot, hate filled cleric, or self-appointed crusader. One can take their pick. Omran Daqneesh is just one such victim suffering as one of the untold and unknown millions of others in places far and wide.  His photograph almost demands comment and should provoke reasonable thought among the warring parties but, as well all know far too well, it will not.  It will fade away as just another forgotten image of the strife running rampant in places some of us couldn’t even find on a map.

MORALS

Some calls to arms are indeed moral; initiated from a sense of blatant provocation and injustice.  Our foray into Afghanistan in October 2001 was one such conflict infused with a distinct moral imperative.  We knew exactly why we sent our soldiers to fight.  The al Qeada attacks on our soil and their Taliban hosts brought the full weight and fury of the United States military unto themselves.  Our efforts were supported virtually uniformly by countries around the world.

Our “war of choice” against Iraq was no such similar situation and the aftermath of the fall of Sadaam Hussein proved that fact in spades.  We quickly found ourselves in a morally ambiguous scenario of our own creation but, that entire matter is a discussion for another time.  Presently our government must seriously consider our status and purpose in some of the military engagements we are in.  Are these all in our “national interest”?  If so, we should engage fully, decisively and in haste to end such a conflict to our satisfaction.  If not, we should as rapidly disengage and allow the warring parties to carry on without any further intervention by our government.  These decisions each have more than a thin veneer of morality; they call into question the very basic tenets and principals of our governmental and military intervention policies and practices.

THE FLIGHT OF THE INNOCENTS

Twenty years of uninterrupted war from the Balkans to Ukraine, Sudan, Somalia and Yemen, to Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan among the most horrific of these conflicts has created a humanitarian crisis that rivals that induced by WWII.  The literal floods of men, women, and children fleeing on foot with only the clothes on their backs does not get the amount of attention it should.  Be they referred to as “refugees”, “displaced persons”, “asylum seekers” or just migrants are merely a matter of terminology.  Millions of people have been uprooted from their homes and homelands as the ravages of wars consume all vestiges of civilized life.    This flood of humanity demands attention and the burden of aiding these people should be borne by neighboring countries.  What were constructed years ago as temporary refugee camps or relocation centers have become small nation/states unto themselves.  The wealthy Arab countries should take in Arab refugees just as Muslim countries should accept the hordes of the displaced Muslims.  Removing these masses of humanity from their home region essentially assures they will never again have the chance to return to their homeland and restart their lives.
All the United States can and should do is provide humanitarian resources.  This epic trek of humanity can only be made right some day in the future if these people can be repatriated to the places they had called home for centuries. 








Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2016 © All Rights Reserved
Copyright Brooding Cynyc 2016 © All Rights Reserved





Wednesday, August 10, 2016

OBAMA'S BIG COMMUTE



EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY AND

THE SHORTNESS OF MEMORY
NYPD OFFICERS STAND GUARD IN FRONT OF THE FEDERAL COURT BUILDING FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LOCATED AT 500-PEARL STREET




TAGS: OBAMA COMMUTES FEDERAL INMATES SENTENCES,

THE “WAR YEARS”, DRUG WARS 1980’S & 1990’S, FEDERAL COURTS, DEA, FBI,

LEC, NYPD, CLEMENCY INSULT TO LEC




(Monday August 8, 2016 500 - Pearl St., NYC) Perhaps you had to have lived through those brutal years on the streets of our inner cities.  The 1980’s and early 1990’s were the “War Years” as the illicit drug trade in all its violent manifestations infected neighborhoods from coast to coast. In New York City by 1985 the “crack epidemic” was at full throttle as the highly addictive “rock” form of cocaine hit the streets at a fraction of the coast of the powder form of cocaine.  With this epidemic came waves of violence as drug traffickers fought endless turf battles that had blood running in the gutters and local residents held captive in fear of their own streets.  The Law Enforcement Community (LEC) was in some ways ill-prepared for the carnage and raw violence that the crack trade was becoming notorious for.  From the Federal Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) to local Police Departments it often felt like a losing battle.  Drug traffickers and their armies of street dealers had brought the weapons of war to our streets in the form of high-powered firearms, assault-style weapons, “Cop Killer bullets”, and a “take no prisoners” approach to their particular brand of urban warfare.

As the body counts rose and more and more innocent bystanders found their deaths at the hands of those foot soldiers occupying our streets, the Criminal Justice system was being derided as ineffective and simply not up to the challenges of this modern drug war.  In turn the State and Federal Courts began to prosecute very aggressively as Law Enforcement began concerted efforts to regain control block by block, corner by corner, one neighborhood at a time.  These times required new tools to be made available for those in Law Enforcement as well as on the prosecutorial side of the fight.  It was slow going but eventually the corner began to be turned as the Police interdicted more effectively and the Federal Courts enacted tougher sentencing guidelines including “mandatory minimums” for some of the most egregious perpetrators.

THE NATURE OF THE BEAST

Last Wednesday, August 3rd, President Obama commuted the sentences of 214 federal inmates including 67 who had been serving life sentences.  It was the largest number of commutations ever made by a President in a single day and brings his total to a whopping 562 commutations, more than the last nine President’s combined. He claimed that the majority of those offenders whose sentences he shortened had been convicted of “nonviolent drug offenses” and that many were the “victims” of harsh, “draconian” sentencing guidelines. That is quite a statement from a man who is a Constitutional lawyer whose adopted hometown of Chicago has been awash in unprecedented violence in recent months much of which is connected to the drug trade.

The term “nonviolent drug offenders” is in many ways an oxymoron.  The drug trade by its very nature is a violence filled enterprise. Yes, there are some among those serving Federal time who were caught up in the tough-minded sentencing of the 1980’s and 1990’s.  However, those tactics did not evolve in isolation; they were the direct response to the reality of the day.

Not many drug offenders wind up in a Federal penitentiary by accident.  No, not at all.  Most of those prosecuted under Federal statutes were “high level” traffickers who dealt in high volume distribution of an illegal product.  While any such “kingpin” may or may not have murdered a rival, a disloyal soldier, or a delinquent payer it is beyond doubt to believe they were not responsible for such violence.  Many of these offenders were prosecuted under the famed RICO predicates, the mechanism by which the Federal Courts can indict and prosecute individuals as part of a “criminal conspiracy”, a highly effective legal tool that has been an effective means to the ends of shutting down large and small drug rings.  What are now being classified by some and certainly by this President as “unusually harsh sentences” were clearly not seen in that light at the time they were imposed.  Yes, there is an apparent shortness of memory among those now clamoring for sweeping reforms to the Courts and in the prisons.  Those seeking such reforms are engaged in a dangerous brand of activism.  Obviously they did not live through the War Years.

AN EXECUTIVE KICK IN THE GROIN

The “Drug Wars” of the eighties and nineties were fought on many different fronts.  The DEA fought the smugglers on their own turf, often in highly covert paramilitary operations while Law Enforcement Agencies (LEA) coast to coast played rough games of cat and mouse often having no choice but to meet brutal force with brutal force. Many Federal cases took years of dogged investigation often at great risk to the Agents and Officers involved. The Department of Justice and the FBI recognized the scale and scope of the drug wars and had to adapt as they went.  It seemed as if the smugglers and dealers, the distributors and henchmen were always one step ahead of Law Enforcement.  In some ways they were.  Due to our body of laws, the rules of engagement, limited investigative powers in tools such as wiretaps, utilizing “confidential informers”, and the “burden of proof”, the LEC was often forced to fight these battle severely restricted by domestic laws and Constitutionally assured rights of the offenders.  But this is our system and despite the difficulties over imposed on the LEC, progress was able to be made.

The Courts were the true bludgeon available to make a concerted effort not simply to stem the flow of drugs on our streets but to punish those most responsible. These cases were meticulously assembled and presented by seasoned Federal prosecutors.  Now many of their efforts are being reversed in a casual way that seems to disconnect the crimes and criminals granted commutation of their sentences.   These were the people guilty of the deaths of unknown users, addicts, rival gang members and innocent people trying to carry out their lives in virtual combat zones.  There are no “nonviolent” members of a drug enterprise even if they themselves haven’t pulled a trigger.  As a member of a legally proven criminal drug conspiracy, guilt is equitable shared among all members except for those who flip and rat on their former “brothers in arms”.  There is no honor among thieves and many a guilty party turns to testify as part of a plea bargain or for the promise of immunity.

The cost in blood and death to members of the forces who valiantly fought the drug wars on behalf of the law, all the DEA agents, Police Officers and other members of the LEC injured or killed in the line of duty during those dirty years have suddenly received a big, swift kick in the balls from our President.  All the countless efforts made, all the take-downs, buy and busts, undercover operations, investigations, arrests and prosecutions of those in the drug trade have been in a way completely negated by this atrocious maneuver to grant clemency by President Obama.  What are the Officers involved in the arrest of these guilty parties who will soon be released to think?  How demoralizing is it that years after the fact an activist President frees an individual you had a part in having convicted?  There are more than a few demoralized, disgusted veteran LEA wondering aloud today about these commuted sentences.

SECOND CHANCES

Those on the side of jail and prison “reform”, inmate’s rights, vocal opponents of much of our Criminal Justice system, as well as President Obama assert that “this is a country of second chances”.  Everybody deserves a second chance”.  Even the most cursory review of those granted clemency last week reveals that each and every one of them had at least a second, third and fourth chance.  Some among these offenders were arrested in the possession of a firearm which automatically enhances whatever other criminal charges levied on them.  These are repeat offenders some with criminal records that stand as proof of lifetimes of criminal activity.  Not many offenders make it to the federal courts and very, very few end up in federal custody by virtue of wrongful prosecution or some alleged nefarious activity on the part of the Courts.

In the last few years the political Left has latched on to the concept of jail and prison reform as a “cause”.  Yes, our jails and prisons are overcrowded, underfunded, understaffed, and ill-equipped to deal with some of the pre-existing mental health issue many inmates suffer from.  The introduction and successes of the “for profit prison industry” has had a double-edged sword effect on incarceration and the management of correctional facilities.  But that is also a product of the past, that past when the drug wars raged and blood ran in our streets.  All of this hand-wringing and second guessing merely undermines the efforts of the entire LEC even at a time when violence across America is on the rise, premeditated attacks on LEO are becoming dangerously commonplace, and some of our larger cities are seeing levels of gunfire and gang-related death reminiscent of the eighties and nineties.  If anything these times call for more aggressive prosecution on every level of the criminal justice system.  Clearly this is not the time to have our Federal government sending mixed signals to the criminal class.

We’ll have to watch and wait to see which of these newly freed convicts kills someone upon their release.  It is not a proposition of “if”, it is a fact of “when”.













Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2016 © All Rights Reserved
Copyright Brooding Cynyc 2016 © All Rights Reserved