Showing posts with label Law Enforcement and the Black Community. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Law Enforcement and the Black Community. Show all posts

Thursday, July 16, 2020

DEMONSTRATIONS, PROTESTS, AND VIOLENCE FUELS


THIS SUMMER OF DISCONTENT

“Outside the street's on fire in a real death waltz”

From “Jungleland” by Bruce Springsteen



Tags and Updated Links:

NYPD Strategic Response Group, Disorder Control Unit,

Mass Demonstrations, Random Destruction, Vandalism,

and Violence, Historical Perspective,

 

 

 

 

(Thursday July 16, 2020, Midtown North) We have seen this horribly distorted anarchic dance before.  Certainly, the NYPD has within our collective memory banks the recollections of such turbulence, anti-Police street warfare, and the shotgun merging of disjointed factions of malcontents delivering the shit bombs of social unrest and violence onto our streets under the guise of “social justice”.  Oh yes, we have seen this frenzied dance before.  Legitimate protesters clear the way for scumbag looters, rioters, and those infected with a criminal instinct in an effort to deliver a nightmare scenario as the nights comes in.  The darkness conceals what the next mornings light will reveal. Broken store windows, vile graffiti, embers of dying fires, shattered glass from attacked NYPD vehicles, and looted goods strewn across some of most famous thoroughfares. The acrid aroma of the previous night’s chaos lingers and the daily headlines describe the transpiring events that marked the early morning hours.  While most of Our City slept the NYPD constricted, and effectively isolated the skirmish lines to a few limited pockets of lawlessness.

 

CAUSE AND EFFECT

 

On Memorial Day, May 25th, a White Minneapolis Police Officer was filmed pinning a Black suspect, George Floyd, to the pavement shortly after responding to a 911 call. The senior Officer at the scene Officer Derek Chauvin used his body weight as he kept his knee on the neck of Mr. Floyd. For nearly nine minutes Chauvin applied his body weight pressure even as Mr. Floyd repeatedly begged for relief saying several times, “I can’t breathe”.  The scene was captured on cellphone video by many bystanders.  The other three Officers who accompanied Chauvin appeared to stand idly by as the life and death crisis unfolded.  Mr. Floyd was pronounced dead within an hour at a local hospital. Within hours as the sunset a crowd began to gather in front of the Cup Foods market, the scene of Mr. Floyd’s death.  It did not take long for the first small fire to be lit, to hear the first sounds of neighborhood shop windows being broken.  As the night wore on the crowd turned into a mob, a mob hellbent on destruction.  As is always the case the looters came out and had carte blanche in their thieving; the Minneapolis Police Department was instructed to basically “Stand Down” and allow the unrest to escalate unabated. On the third night of the upheaval rioters managed to gain access to a Police Precinct and burn it to the ground.  It was this act of surrender that would define the riot that followed not only in Minneapolis but in cities large and small across the country. The Minneapolis Police Department will forever have this shameful episode of blatant abdication as a dark chapter of failure as part of their legacy.

 

THE PEBBLE IN THE POND

 

The death of George Floyd was the proverbial pebble in the pond.  A small piece of stone dropped into a small urban pond that caused a cascading series of social unrest that rippled across the country from coast to coast.  Night after night as late June turned into July “peaceful demonstrators” would march in our cities streets while the nights grew ever more hazardous to life and property as many communities with little to no previous experience with crowd control tactics became literal hotbeds of random and coordinated violence and looting.  Oh yeah, there is ALWAYS looting.   Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King once said that “Rioting is the voice of the oppressed”. That may be so.  However, vandalism, destruction, and looting are the language of the opportunistic criminal element.

 

 

 

As the weeks immediately following the worst of the rioting have given way to a more sober approach by many “activists” and “neighborhood organizers” in the Black Lives Matter movement and associated but less well defined “causes”, the mainstream media and commentators, analysts, and assorted “experts” and “academics” have sought to piece what they see has a simplistic puzzle into a coherent explanatory mosaic.  But the world is not quite that simple despite how much such people wish it were.  They are seemingly preoccupied with weaving together a broad range of issues with an unwieldy needle.  Their determination to complete the mosaic includes weaving in the devastating effects of the Corona Virus across the country and particularly in the Black and Brown communities, the severe economic impact in those communities, a federal and local government who do not truly represent their issues.

 

HOLDING THE LINE

 

It did not take long for the ripples of near-anarchic lawlessness to invade the streets of Our City.  On the weekend after George Floyd’s death, the hierarchy in 1PP sent an e-mail to all Members of Service (MOS) to “get your uniform ready”, that all MOS from every Command, Bureau, Unit, and Squad to be prepared to respond to any Precinct, in full uniform including “hats and bats” - (Riot helmets and Batons).  The top brass in the Department was fully aware that it was just a matter of time, literally hours not days, before the criminal and social unrest would be unleashed on our streets.  There is hands down no better trained and equipped  Police Department in the country prepared for such widespread disorder (more to come on this at a later date).  The Disorder Control Unit and its subsidiary Strategic Response Group have largely mastered the tactical and strategic art and science of mass demonstrations and the violent unrest that is certain to follow.

 

The challenge during this period of time was that there were “multiple hotspots” requiring NYPD intervention from Manhattan to Brooklyn.  The upheaval in The Bronx was primarily the “typical” opportunistic vandalism and looting that was quickly extinguished relative to the huge throngs of people of various ideologies and violent intent that invaded sections of Brooklyn around the Barclays Center, in McCarren Park, Grand Army Plaza, and Crown Heights.  In Manhattan several very large groups of marchers made their way along the West Side Highway toward Columbus Circle, from 110th Street and Central Park West to Washington Square Park, and several times they marched back and forth across the Brooklyn Bridge into Manhattan.  There is nothing “peaceful” about obstructing the traffic on our City’s main thoroughfares, impeding the flow of Emergency Response Agencies including the FDNY – EMS, and NYPD.  The looting was most severe just blocks from here in Midtown Manhattan, Times and Herald Squares, the locations of some of the most famous, iconic retailers including Macys.

 

LOOSING GROUND

 

As our City has poised for the next phase of “Reopening” from the last remaining Covid-19 restrictions the rioting has taken on a far more deadly, sinister complexion.  In what has seemingly become nightly occurrences the rate of gun-related crime has soared, direct attacks on MOS of the NYPD have risen to unprecedented levels, and the hard fought and won victories in sharply curtailing violent crime over the last 25 years is rapidly dissipating in the summer heat. The facts on the ground are in no way a reflection of the men and women of the NYPD.  Not at all. The widespread disorder and violence can be laid directly in the lap of the useless Mayor, Bill de Blasio.  

 

The hapless Mayor embarrasses himself daily while holding during press conferences.  He is completely devoid of any understanding about Our City, the diversity and complexities that are unique to NYC.  His politics, for lack of a better word, and pursuant policies as stated in his press conferences expose a man epically unfit for the Office he now holds.  It has become grossly obvious in a short period of time how his liberal views skew his approach regarding how  Our City is governed, the role of the NYPD, and his disgusting desire to appease the left-wing extremists, even those who have perpetrated acts of wanton civil disruption and frenzied turbulence on our streets.

 

SUMMERS PAST

 

We have lived through long hot summers many times in the history of Our City.  Those of us of a certain age can remember all too vividly those long-ago days when it felt that NYC was transforming into an armed encampment by radical groups.  Their goals and objectives may have varied but their tactics were the same. We suffered through race riots several times in the 1960’s, as well as many anti-Vietnam war demonstrations. We knew days of palpable fear in Our subways and the long burning inferno that leveled large swathes of the South Bronx from arson.  There were two summers when a faceless murderous entity who called himself the “Son of Sam” roamed the hot, still, muggy nights searching for prey around various “lovers’ lanes”.  Yes, in many ways this is a dance we have seen before.  Perhaps among the social phenomenon that does distinguish today from those similar epochs are the facts that much of the violence is organized by technology.  Like-minded people can rapidly communicate and coordinate their activities via “smart phones” and a range of social media “apps” that serve as meeting places.  What are now designated as “flash mobs” can appear very quickly as organizers can instantly orchestrate their adherent’s movements, hide caches of crude but effective weapons such as bricks, baseball bats, and Molotov cocktails to be used against the MOS of the NYPD.

 

Is what is transpiring in several large cities across the country a harbinger for the future happenings in NYC? If so, we very well may be doing battle with this civil and social turmoil for quite some time. In cities such as Portland, Oregon, Seattle, Washington, Austin, Texas, Louisville, Kentucky just to name a few, the protests persist with varying degrees of militancy. Indeed, we may be compelled to more aggressively operate to protect the greater good of NYC and all Our people in every Borough and Command.  It may be a long, hot, protracted deployment of “Hats and Bats”.

 

May the Good Lord Protect

The Men and Women of The NYPD

 

 

Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2020 © All Rights Reserved

Copyright Brooding Cynyc 2020 © All Rights Reserved

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Friday, May 22, 2015

THE BALTIMORE SIX: PROSECUTION, PERSECUTION OR PACIFICATION FOR THE PUBLIC?



SIX BPD OFFICERS INDICTED FOR THE “IN CUSTODY”

DEATH OF FREDDIE GRAY
The six Baltimore Police Officers indicted for the in custody death of Freddie Gray





TAGS: BALTIMORE POLICE OFFICERS INDICTED, STATE PROSECUTOR MARILY MOSBY,

PROSECUTORIAL OVER REACH AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, SEEKING REAL JUSTICE OR PACIFYING AN ANGRY

PUBLIC ?, THE REALITY OF POLICING IN HOSTILE COMMUNITIES, PROSECUTOR HAS ALREADY CORRUPTED HER CASE,

“FAIR” TRIAL NEAR IMPOSSIBILITY IN BALTIMORE









(Thursday May 21, 2015 Baltimore, MY)  A Baltimore Grand Jury decided today to level indictments of the six Baltimore Police Officers alleged to have been responsible for the death of Freddie Gray, a 25 year old they had arrested last month who died while in Police custody.  The indictments, such as they are, ranging from misdemeanors to felony depraved heart homicide, came as no surprise given Marilyn Mosby, the Baltimore State Attorney’s announcement made just days after a week of protests and demonstrations that saw several nights of violent rioting, that she would seek such indictments. 



Less than four months into her reign as the State Prosecutor for the City of Baltimore, 35 year old Marilyn Mosby has found herself confronting an arduous task.  Before the Baltimore Police Department (BPD) has concluded their own investigation having assigned over 40 investigators, forensics specialists and crime scene analysts; even without the results of the preliminary official autopsy finding having been made known to the lawyers for the plaintiffs and defendants, Mosby announced her intention to indict  six BPD MOS during a hastily arranged press conference on Friday May 3rd. Her announcement was riddled with many of the same phrases employed by protesters some of whom participated in criminal activity during otherwise peaceful demonstrations; Mosby’s announcement was a biased, litany of charges against the Officers based on scant forensic data and absent the final autopsy report at the time. While the BPD was conducting a sweeping investigation of the episode with over 40 investigators assigned to that detail, Mosby came to her conclusion to seek Grand Jury indictments after having four investigators report back to her in less than 24 hours.  She neither consulted with nor informed the BPD Chief Anthony Batts that she was poised to make her announcement at a press conference until “about ten minutes before”, according to Chief Batts, she stepped out in front of the wolf pack press.  It was grossly obvious she was choosing to indict to pacify the radical element in Baltimore; parroting protestor’s language was a clear example of just how unqualified and inherently biased Ms. Mosby is.  She amateurishly proclaimed that she “heard the calls for justice” and was prepared for “an aggressive prosecution” of the Officers allegedly involved.



During that May 3rd press conference she repeatedly commented that she has “heard the voices of the protestors” and is aware of their “anger and frustration”.  She made so many inappropriate statements that she might have just admitted her indictments were meant to pacify and quiet the vocal throngs expressing their anger peacefully as well as those who opted to riot, burn and loot destructively.  Her announcement is being classified as one of the most “unprofessional”, “weak”, and “shoddy” criminal indictment many legal experts have ever seen.  Without realizing it she has already so drastically corrupted her “case” beyond repair and if she will not recuse herself the Governor of Maryland or the State’s Attorney General should take the proper measures to remove her from the prosecution of this complex, volatile case that has garnered national and international attention.



Many prominent legal scholars, former prosecutors and criminal defense attorneys have lambasted Mosby for her “rush to judgement”, the subjective nature of her argument to indict and the host of conflict of interests that engulf her.  She is married to Nick Mosby the Baltimore Councilman in whose district the Freddie Gray episode transpired.  She has close ties to one of the attorneys representing the Gray family, Billy Murphy, and he was a financial contributor to her campaign for the Office she currently holds.  Her objectivity must be questioned given her years long affiliation with various community activist groups and other organizations in Baltimore.  It is very difficult to imagine how she can conduct a legal proceeding given her subjective history in matters addressing the alleged disparities in the criminal justice system regarding young Black men.



By the very nature of her elected Office, State Attorney Mosby as a sworn Officer of the Court is bound to conduct her duties in strict accordance with the body of law that governs our criminal justice system and jurisprudence.  She is mandated to be as objective in her pursuit of justice and has the burden of proof; she needs to present her cases and prove the particulars of each indictment beyond the scope of “reasonable doubt”.  By her public statements it appears that she has already corrupted her case to such a degree that a fair prosecution of the indicted Officers is not possible.  In her youthful zeal, inexperience and misuse of her “public platform” she seems to have not only grossly mishandled the “case”, but has also set the stage for a mistrial at best, having all charges against the Baltimore Police Officers dropped at worst, if her prosecution ever even makes it to trial.  The range of charges against the Officers alone will strain her ability to present arguments that go beyond the burden of proof.  The Officers need not “prove” their innocence; Ms. Mosby needs to prove their guilt and, for Officer Caesar Goodman the driver of the Police van transporting Mr. Gray, the charge of “depraved heart” second-degree homicide is the most serious and will be the most challenging to prove. Actually, as many legal experts have commented, all of the charges will be very difficult to prove beyond reasonable doubt that is, if the empaneled jury functions objectively which is debatable given the publicity attending these indictments.



Compounding matters even further is the fact that the controversial arrest and in custody death of Mr. Gray did not occur in a social vacuum; his death is just the latest in a sad litany of unarmed African American men who have allegedly died by the hands of Police Officers in the last year or so.  The inherent difficulty, some say impossibility, to adjudicate a “fair trial” for the Baltimore Officers, will necessitate Ms. Mosby’s ability to divorce Mr. Gray’s death from what most in the African American community see as a systemic pattern of Police abuses, brutalities and disregard for “Black Lives”.  Six Baltimore Police Officers have been indicted specifically in this case but the broader indictment against the BPD as a whole and Law Enforcement Agencies (LEA’s) writ large will cast a heavy shadow over the proceedings in a Baltimore courtroom.



Despite this recent tragic rash of episodes of unarmed young African American men alleged to have died  as a direct result of some interaction with a Police Officer or Officers, there is no statistical evidence to support the claims made by activists and self-appointed leaders in the Black community, that the Police devalue the lives of people of color.  Many commentators and talking heads present anecdotal evidence as fact laying out numbers the source of which are dubious at best, blatantly contrived at worst.  The Department of Justice, the top LEA in the country, admits there is no truly accurate data collected, collated and analyzed from jurisdictions large and small that indicates the veracity of the claims made by members of the African American community regarding LEA’s impropriety in their neighborhoods.  Many have presented numbers as “fact” with no reference to the source of such numbers.  Clearly, the Attorney General and the Justice Department have a vested interest in the collection of actual numbers, of real data but, as they readily admit, there is a paucity in this area.  Given the number of public-police interactions on a daily basis across the country, the overwhelmingly factual record plainly illustrates for all to see that 99% of such interactions transpire without event or negative outcome.  The jagged edges of these unimpeachable facts are what sticks in the craw of those who expend their efforts to  portray each Police interaction with a Black or Brown skinned person, particularly young males, as an over reach of Police powers, racial profiling, endemic racism among Law Enforcement Officers (LEO’s), or an instance of aggressive bias.  Are there bad Police Officers; LEO’s who are racist bigots all too willing to be heavy handed and short tempered with young men of color?  Absolutely yes, there are.  But, the number of LEO’s who fall into that category represent an infinitesimally small number of men and women who wear the badge.  This fact is an untidy nuisance to those who hope to present their arguments otherwise.  That is their prerogative; they have the Constitutional right to express their sentiments, record the actions of Police Officers on their cell phones, protest and demonstrate for a contrary truth but, after the dust settles, after the last embers of a burning building in a riot zone are extinguished, the objective truths remain intact.



In many respects this argument can be distilled down to the bare essentials.  Most of the most bellicosely vocal opponents of the Police are far removed from the narrow concrete canyons of tough urban streets, densely populated housing projects, and the reality of street crime in all its many guises. While they may be earnest and well-meaning in their assertions and concerns about the Police they speak from distances that preclude them from some of the harsher realities of the streets.  Isolated and insulated from the “front lines” of the gritty, often violent aspects of Law Enforcement, they make their judgments based on preconceived notions and beliefs unabashedly ignoring the perils the men and women of the LEC put themselves in every time they suit up to go to work.  The profound misunderstanding between these two factions, the LEC and its detractors poses an unbridgeable gulf that is only spanned by irresponsible hyperbolic, inflammatory demagoguery.  In this climate no honest exchange of ideas and perspective is possible.



The fate of the “Baltimore Six” will be determined one way or another in due process and time.  Until that day life goes on, the ebb and flow of life on the streets awaits no vindication or validation.

























































                                     Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2015 © All Rights Reserved