FBI DIRECTOR’S
BOMBSHELL:
THE LAW IS
THE LAW
HILLARY IS
NOT ABOVE THE LAW
COMEY MAY
BE ALL THAT STANDS BETWEEN HILLARY AND THE OVAL OFFICE
COMEY’S
DECISION PERHAPS A “COME TO JESUS” MOMENT.
DESPITE
KNOWING HE’D TAKE FIRE
HE FINALLY
DECIDED TO FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE,
ALLOW HIS
AGENCY TO ENFORCE THE LAW
TAGS:
FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY’S DECISION, HILLARY CLINTON & “CRIMINAL
ENTERPRISES” EXPOSED,
FBI
TO RE-OPEN HILLARY’S E-MAIL INVESTIGATION,
LATEST
DEVELOPMENT COULD FINALLY DERAIL HER PRESIDENTIAL AMBITIONS,
VOTERS
TO DECIDE IN 9 DAYS,
(Sunday October 30, 2016, NYC)
In an unprecedented extraordinarily controversial move FBI Director James Comey
announced Friday morning that he was reopening the agency’s investigation of
Hillary Clinton’s e-mail affair after having concluded that “no charges” were
warranted in the case in July. Comey’s
decision to make his intentions known by sending a letter explaining his
rationale to ranking members of Congress is being seen as the most significant “October
Surprise” since President Richard Nixon fired a Special Prosecutor looking into
the facts that would ultimately come to be known as Watergate.
The motives behind Comey’s
campaign rocking statement of intentions vary wildly depending on which side of
the political spectrum one is aligned with.
Democrat’s that hailed Comey as a “true, steady, non-partisan” man of
integrity in July are now excoriating him almost as Satan incarnate. Likewise, Republicans that slammed him
mercilessly now laud him as a “hero”.
With his well-known, widely heralded reputation as a man of honesty,
unimpeachable non-partisanship, and high moral integrity one ought not be
swayed in assuming Comey acted in bad faith in this
development into what former FBI Assistant Director James Kallestrom the “crime
family” known as Bill and Hillary Clinton and all their related enterprises
from her tenure as Secretary of State, presidential campaign, (Bill and Hillary’s)
their Clinton Foundation and self-enriching practices.
Perhaps Comey’s Irish Catholic
conscience finally got the better of him and he may have realized in a moment
of introspection that he and all the powers invested in him in his Office is
all that stands between the real possibility of a Hillary Clinton presidency;
having an “unindicted criminal” in the Oval Office. His history of integrity and honesty one
might speculate would not allow him to “sit” on this new information that came
to light in an unrelated FBI probe into the former husband of Hillary’s
long-time closest aide and confidante Huma Abedin. Abedin’s estranged spouse is none other than “Carlos
Danger”, the moniker employed by disgraced former Congressman Anthony Weiner
during his sexting exploits with a minor on-line. The FBI is conducting an investigation into
Weiner’s on-line activities which span at least the past five years. Allegedly some e-mails between Abedin and
Hillary while she was secretary of State and more recently as well as among others
in the “Clinton political/financial/influence peddling orbit” were found on a
computer Weiner shared with his former wife.
That the disgraced sexual predator Weiner may in fact be the last straw
in Hillary’s decades long saga of ruthlessness political ambition and calculation,
her well documented history as a pathological liar, and her scorched earth
politicking is an ironic twist near the end of the most twisted presidential
race in the 240-year history of our Democratic Republic.
NO JULY FIREWORKS
In July Comey’ decision was
seen as a capitulation to political pressures.
In just one odd twist of events that cast another shadow over the waning
days of the investigation, Comey’s boss, Attorney General Loretta Lynch met
with Bill Clinton for 40 minutes of discussing “grandchildren and golf(?)” when
both of their airplanes just so happened to be idle on the same tarmac in Phoenix
on June 27th. Just days after their “innocent” highly suspicious
meeting that strained the limits of propriety if not believability Lynch
announced that she would “defer” to the decision of the FBI insofar as leveling
charges against anyone under investigation including Hillary Clinton. Her decision effectively foreclosed the deal
that would allow Hillary to dodge indictment.
Her announcement and Comey’s summary of findings created an “uproar”
among career prosecutors in the DOJ as well as the FBI.
In his July 5th statement
he called Mrs. Clinton’s handling of classified information by using a private
internet server “extremely careless” and admitting that had any of his
employees acted in a similar manner they would face a range of serious
sanctions up to and including “dismissal” from the FBI. The FBI has spent the last year conducting
their investigation having interviewed the former Secretary of State on July 3rd. His statement also included a damning “non-indictment”
of Hillary Clinton’s blatant lies, destruction of evidence under subpoena, as
well as damaging testimony from some of her closest aides and campaign
operatives that proved they were aware of the legal hazards Clinton’s e-mail
practices posed. Consensus opinion in
both the DOJ and FBI was that Hillary’s “reckless, irresponsible activities that
ran contrary to all statutes of confidentiality and handling of information of
a sensitive national security nature” warranted not only an indictment but a “full-fledged
prosecution”. But that was not to be the
case and the Hillary juggernaut steaming towards her presidency rolled on
unimpeded.
OCTOBER FIREWORKS
Our presidential politics have
a long history of potentially game changing revelations that have come to be
known as an “October Surprise”. Past
campaigns have held back explosive items unearthed earlier while conducting “opposition
research” in the hope that a last minute revelation will have the maximum
effect inflicting fatal damage to their opponents White House ambitions. Typically, these nuggets of past impropriety
and scandal do not have the intended affect and seem to fade away as rapidly as
they ignited. Many political observers
and academics have asserted that some of the allegations that Hillary’s
opponent, Donald J. Trump, has behaved in a “sexually predatory manner” in the
past and the parade of alleged victims of his crude, lude and lascivious alleged
episodes have been viewed by many as the Clinton camp’s attempt of an October Surprise. Clearly the fact that this ever increasing
list of women alleged to have been so victimized, some claiming their
victimhood occurred in the past up to 20 years ago seems on its face to be a non-too
convenient series of disclosures intended to further damage Trump’s already
high negative ratings among women voters and, in particular white college
educated suburban women, a key demographic for both candidates and one that
Hillary should naturally attract. But
that has not been the case.
Despite the potentially
historic election of our first woman president, Hillary’s overall un-favorability
rating coupled with the general public’s perception that she is “untrustworthy,
dishonest, and will say anything to anyone audience” to be elected has this
race at a virtual tie in the most recent national polls according to those
conducted by the Wall Street Journal, CNN/ABC and other highly reputable
pollsters. It is beyond infuriating to
Hillary and her cadre of surrogates that a man with no military service or
history in public office, a billionaire Manhattan real estate developer and
reality TV star, is actually neck and neck with the candidate touted as being “the
most qualified person to ever run” for the presidency. That in and of itself is a gross mischaracterization
and unabashedly arrogant, inaccurate and in some ways telling representation of
a woman whose past “successes” can all be attributed to the fact that she
married a very gifted politician in Bill Clinton. Hillary’s ascendancy has been
one of a bastardized nepotism, quid pro
quo corrupt politicking and being the benefactor of the most powerful
political machine in the last 50-plus years (possibly ever).
It is possible that this
October Surprise may prove to be a decisive factor for those undecided voters
wary of both candidates; those who perceive their ultimate choice as nothing
more than the “lesser of two evils”.
Hillary supporters can
complain and grouse wildly and loudly but Hillary and her insulting, flippant lack
of cooperation with the FBI, congenital absence of honesty, hubris, sense of
entitlement and blatant disregard for federal laws and protocols has landed her
in this mired position a scant 9 days from the election. That the bizarre appearance as a factor in
this long bruising campaign is Anthony “Carlos Danger” Weiner and Hillary’s
soulmate Huma Abedin, is oddly appropriate.
She has dodged and ducked often artfully a myriad of scandals and malfeasance's,
abuses of her various Offices and their vested powers to such unmitigated
depths of criminality and corruption, that it is high time she exit from public
life.
Some in the media claim there
is a degree of “Clinton Fatigue” among the electorate. That has been proven to be a true assessment
of a wide swathe of the public’s opinion.
They are simply tired of her and her cronies; they’ve grown weary of her
face and voice, her lame excuses for past wrongs and shallow appeals and
pandering for their votes. Yes, much of
America has already decided the we have had quite enough of Hillary
Clinton. The only way to permanently excise
her from our national consciousness, prevent her hands to be on the official
levers of power that are bestowed upon a President of the United States, and
remove her from our lives is to vote for Donald J. Trump.
Copyright The Brooding Cynyx 2016 © All Rights Reserved
Copyright Brooding Cynyc 2016 © All Rights Reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment